knicks1248 wrote:

fishmike wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Uptown wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I'm really interested on seeing who's minutes gets cut. I think Miller has been doing a very solid job managing the rotation..But if Bullock can give you 3&D, something we haven't really haven't gotten from knox or frank, what do you do

No way should he cut into Knox's mins...We're 7-21...We need to be developing our young players. Moreover, Knox has had 2 consecutive good games...

I know, but we have seen this knox before, and he doesnt stick around long. Maybe miller can get him to play both ends more consistent, but there's no question his motor shuts off and on..

I just realize that rhymes...uh oh Bars baby..lol

Knox has shown a more consistent effort level lately. I wouldnt cut his minutes unless that effort level drops again, not.just an off game or two. Too early to talk about cutting bait IMO. Youngest or second youngest player in the league last season, has shown enough to be patient. A .200 winning pct team isnt a great place to figure things out. Maybe a better prepared team will pay dividends.

how bright our future is largely depends on how Knox develops. Bullock has nothing to do with that. Morris has nothing to do with that. The season is lost, it makes no sense to starve Knox of minutes to benefit our mercenarie$

season is absolutely NOT lost. Thats madness. Knicks should look to play better and make the playoffs. My god there are 50+ games left.

supremeCommander wants to continue to tank at all cost so we can develop knox...he wants to get rid of every player the knicks didn't draft.

He is hell bent on making sure we have a fresh new roster every season

and you want to build around Morris and the like. You're also too damned dumb to realize that the Knicks have to go 34 and 20 or win 62.96% of there games just to finish 41-41, what is what you usually plan for to get the #8 seed. and if you're going to put words in my mouth at least get my stance correct. I want to trade every mediocre UFA we signed in the offseason and I want to trade guys the Knicks developed too like Dotson and Trier. None of these guys are long term pieces and you're friggin delusional if you believe that

Lottery reform (as long as we are in it) and a relatively uniform draft class (there is no consensus game changer) ensures we still have a chance to improve in the draft no matter what record we have.

SupremeCommander wrote:

fishmike wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Uptown wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I'm really interested on seeing who's minutes gets cut. I think Miller has been doing a very solid job managing the rotation..But if Bullock can give you 3&D, something we haven't really haven't gotten from knox or frank, what do you do

No way should he cut into Knox's mins...We're 7-21...We need to be developing our young players. Moreover, Knox has had 2 consecutive good games...

I know, but we have seen this knox before, and he doesnt stick around long. Maybe miller can get him to play both ends more consistent, but there's no question his motor shuts off and on..

I just realize that rhymes...uh oh Bars baby..lol

Knox has shown a more consistent effort level lately. I wouldnt cut his minutes unless that effort level drops again, not.just an off game or two. Too early to talk about cutting bait IMO. Youngest or second youngest player in the league last season, has shown enough to be patient. A .200 winning pct team isnt a great place to figure things out. Maybe a better prepared team will pay dividends.

how bright our future is largely depends on how Knox develops. Bullock has nothing to do with that. Morris has nothing to do with that. The season is lost, it makes no sense to starve Knox of minutes to benefit our mercenarie$

season is absolutely NOT lost. Thats madness. Knicks should look to play better and make the playoffs. My god there are 50+ games left.

yes it is

fishmike wrote:

fishmike wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

fishmike wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Uptown wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I'm really interested on seeing who's minutes gets cut. I think Miller has been doing a very solid job managing the rotation..But if Bullock can give you 3&D, something we haven't really haven't gotten from knox or frank, what do you do

No way should he cut into Knox's mins...We're 7-21...We need to be developing our young players. Moreover, Knox has had 2 consecutive good games...

I know, but we have seen this knox before, and he doesnt stick around long. Maybe miller can get him to play both ends more consistent, but there's no question his motor shuts off and on..

I just realize that rhymes...uh oh Bars baby..lol

Knox has shown a more consistent effort level lately. I wouldnt cut his minutes unless that effort level drops again, not.just an off game or two. Too early to talk about cutting bait IMO. Youngest or second youngest player in the league last season, has shown enough to be patient. A .200 winning pct team isnt a great place to figure things out. Maybe a better prepared team will pay dividends.

how bright our future is largely depends on how Knox develops. Bullock has nothing to do with that. Morris has nothing to do with that. The season is lost, it makes no sense to starve Knox of minutes to benefit our mercenarie$

season is absolutely NOT lost. Thats madness. Knicks should look to play better and make the playoffs. My god there are 50+ games left.

yes it is

called it a couple weeks ago:
http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=59734

Tons of useful basketball left still.... a lost season would be riding vets to 35 wins and because we were 5 games out with 8 to play telling the fans "we were in it"

Plenty of time to let young guys play and build chemistry

Yes, let frank and his new friend Dennis run wild and play free!!!!