[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

full marbury interview at msg.com
Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 72430
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/30/2007  10:59 AM
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:


he's just a real street dude and from the hood, so he doesn't always speak using the Kings English.

This is bull**** and it unfairly characterizes "street dudes." Intelligent "street dudes" are coherent.

Marbury's thought process is, at best, circumstantial and tangential.

Code I never intended to group ALL guys who are from the street into one group, tho it could be taken that way. Certainly at least SOME guys that spent a good part of their lives on the street and not heavily engrossed in educational pursuits, have a similar style of expressing themselves and a similar problem in expressing themselves well. Not all, but many do.

Code, the way I write here is pretty much how I actually talk everyday. Somehow I get the sense that you don't go around using the word "tangential" when you talk to friends or colleagues at school or work. I don't know you, but I would hope that you realize it's not necessary to basically show off your vocabulary on this forum.

Now i'd like for you to explain how the words you chose should be applied to Steph's thought process? What's "circumstantial" or "tangential" about how Steph thinks or speaks? I don't even know how you could begin to know how Steph thinks, to be able to make a judgement about his thought process in the first place. Has he ever spoken to you personally and told you what his thought process is or are you so perceptive that you picked that up just from his interviews?


[Edited by - nixluva on 07-30-2007 01:26 AM]

I'm a cardiothoracic surgeon - you better believe thats how I talk to colleagues. And "tangential" is hardly an esoteric word, so I suggest you read a book. This vocabulary nonsense is your usual song and dance - I shouldn't have to dumb things down for you. If you make such an effort to understand Marbury's drivel, you might as well go the extra mile to consider what I'm saying.

Circumstantial and tangential are self-explanatory clinical terms used in psychiatry. He brings up irrelevant facts and fails to connect them in a unified response. Many times, he fails to even answer the question. Look at Marbury's interview again and compare it to what you would expect from a 9th grader. Don't make excuses and evaluate it objectively.


The interview was like George Bush in a debate getting fed information. YOu dan see how tense he got at times. He was doing damage control. The E-mail responses were also provided for him.

When he started getting in Gus' grill Gus went to end it.

There was a certain agenda on that show.

I love when the two little kids came in and wanted an autograph telling steph he was their favorite picture. Looked like someting from the "pride of the Yankees" cheesey kind thing.

Maybe Starbury even signed his name "Lou Gehrig!


AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2007  11:04 AM
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:


he's just a real street dude and from the hood, so he doesn't always speak using the Kings English.

This is bull**** and it unfairly characterizes "street dudes." Intelligent "street dudes" are coherent.

Marbury's thought process is, at best, circumstantial and tangential.

Code I never intended to group ALL guys who are from the street into one group, tho it could be taken that way. Certainly at least SOME guys that spent a good part of their lives on the street and not heavily engrossed in educational pursuits, have a similar style of expressing themselves and a similar problem in expressing themselves well. Not all, but many do.

Code, the way I write here is pretty much how I actually talk everyday. Somehow I get the sense that you don't go around using the word "tangential" when you talk to friends or colleagues at school or work. I don't know you, but I would hope that you realize it's not necessary to basically show off your vocabulary on this forum.

Now i'd like for you to explain how the words you chose should be applied to Steph's thought process? What's "circumstantial" or "tangential" about how Steph thinks or speaks? I don't even know how you could begin to know how Steph thinks, to be able to make a judgement about his thought process in the first place. Has he ever spoken to you personally and told you what his thought process is or are you so perceptive that you picked that up just from his interviews?

I'm a cardiothoracic surgeon - you better believe thats how I talk to colleagues. And "tangential" is hardly an esoteric word, so I suggest you read a book. This vocabulary nonsense is your usual song and dance - I shouldn't have to dumb things down for you. If you make such an effort to understand Marbury's drivel, you might as well go the extra mile to consider what I'm saying.

Circumstantial and tangential are self-explanatory clinical terms used in psychiatry. He brings up irrelevant facts and fails to connect them in a unified response. Many times, he fails to even answer the question. Look at Marbury's interview again and compare it to what you would expect from a 9th grader. Don't make excuses and evaluate it objectively.

Yeah you confirmed it for me. You're a jerk! If you are indeed an educated person, then you should know that there are appropriate times to use common speech and times where it's appropriate to use a more technical or high level of vocabulary. This isn't your place of work and I find it hard to believe that you think using terms that as you put it are "self-explanatory clinical terms used in psychiatry", are appropriate for a BB forum.

Perhaps you're now too far removed from the average joe to bother to understand what he's trying to say. I find it insulting that you think your station in life gives you the right to bash someone for not being as eloquent as you want them to be. At the end of the day you're just a human being and you have to take a crap everyday like anyone else.

"Pride is before a crash and a haughty spirit before a stumbling" Proverbs 16:18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/30/2007  11:09 AM
where is a copy of the tape with marbury and bruce beck?
RIP Crushalot😞
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2007  11:23 AM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by nixluva:


he's just a real street dude and from the hood, so he doesn't always speak using the Kings English.

This is bull**** and it unfairly characterizes "street dudes." Intelligent "street dudes" are coherent.

Marbury's thought process is, at best, circumstantial and tangential.

Code I never intended to group ALL guys who are from the street into one group, tho it could be taken that way. Certainly at least SOME guys that spent a good part of their lives on the street and not heavily engrossed in educational pursuits, have a similar style of expressing themselves and a similar problem in expressing themselves well. Not all, but many do.

Code, the way I write here is pretty much how I actually talk everyday. Somehow I get the sense that you don't go around using the word "tangential" when you talk to friends or colleagues at school or work. I don't know you, but I would hope that you realize it's not necessary to basically show off your vocabulary on this forum.

Now i'd like for you to explain how the words you chose should be applied to Steph's thought process? What's "circumstantial" or "tangential" about how Steph thinks or speaks? I don't even know how you could begin to know how Steph thinks, to be able to make a judgement about his thought process in the first place. Has he ever spoken to you personally and told you what his thought process is or are you so perceptive that you picked that up just from his interviews?

I'm a cardiothoracic surgeon - you better believe thats how I talk to colleagues. And "tangential" is hardly an esoteric word, so I suggest you read a book. This vocabulary nonsense is your usual song and dance - I shouldn't have to dumb things down for you. If you make such an effort to understand Marbury's drivel, you might as well go the extra mile to consider what I'm saying.

Circumstantial and tangential are self-explanatory clinical terms used in psychiatry. He brings up irrelevant facts and fails to connect them in a unified response. Many times, he fails to even answer the question. Look at Marbury's interview again and compare it to what you would expect from a 9th grader. Don't make excuses and evaluate it objectively.

Yeah you confirmed it for me. You're a jerk! If you are indeed an educated person, then you should know that there are appropriate times to use common speech and times where it's appropriate to use a more technical or high level of vocabulary. This isn't your place of work and I find it hard to believe that you think using terms that as you put it are "self-explanatory clinical terms used in psychiatry", are appropriate for a BB forum.

Perhaps you're now too far removed from the average joe to bother to understand what he's trying to say. I find it insulting that you think your station in life gives you the right to bash someone for not being as eloquent as you want them to be. At the end of the day you're just a human being and you have to take a crap everyday like anyone else.

"Pride is before a crash and a haughty spirit before a stumbling" Proverbs 16:18

And you confirmed it. You're an idiot. You have a problem with circumstantial and tangential? Are you trying to tell me that the average person on our UK site doesn't know what "tangential" means? Re-think that. I find it insulting that you think anyone is buying your garbage.

Again, this has zero to do with eloquence. Its not Marbury's vocabulary that is alarming, its his inability to give goal-directed answers.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2007  11:41 AM
Posted by codeunknown:

And you confirmed it. You're an idiot. You have a problem with circumstantial and tangential? Are you trying to tell me that the average person on our UK site doesn't know what "tangential" means? Re-think that. I find it insulting that you think anyone is buying your garbage.

Again, this has zero to do with eloquence. Its not Marbury's vocabulary that is alarming, its his inability to give goal-directed answers.

Code, don't try to twist what i'm saying in an effort to get the rest of the forum against me. I didn't say that the rest of us don't know the definitions of the words. I'm saying that there's no need to go there, just make your point plainly. What I get from your use of those words, which you KNOW aren't just thrown around by most people in everyday conversation, is that your showing off.

I'm sure that at some point in your life you just kicked around with some friends and spoke like everyone else. You didn't have to break out your $10.00 words. If you like that then why not go here and have a blast:

http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=13486167666549929287

or maybe you'd prefer:

http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity2102.html



[Edited by - nixluva on 07-30-2007 11:44 AM]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
7/30/2007  11:56 AM
nixluva, what do you expect with your constant indefensible defending of anything Knick related? It's one thing to be a fan and another to be a complete sycophant ($10).
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/30/2007  12:04 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:

And you confirmed it. You're an idiot. You have a problem with circumstantial and tangential? Are you trying to tell me that the average person on our UK site doesn't know what "tangential" means? Re-think that. I find it insulting that you think anyone is buying your garbage.

Again, this has zero to do with eloquence. Its not Marbury's vocabulary that is alarming, its his inability to give goal-directed answers.

Code, don't try to twist what i'm saying in an effort to get the rest of the forum against me. I didn't say that the rest of us don't know the definitions of the words. I'm saying that there's no need to go there, just make your point plainly. What I get from your use of those words, which you KNOW aren't just thrown around by most people in everyday conversation, is that your showing off.

I'm sure that at some point in your life you just kicked around with some friends and spoke like everyone else. You didn't have to break out your $10.00 words. If you like that then why not go here and have a blast:

http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=13486167666549929287

or maybe you'd prefer:

http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity2102.html

Get the rest of the forum against you? Half the forum already knows how ridiculous your posts are. You tried to debate the concept of an average to make our 3pt shooting better.

If using the word "circumstantial" makes me a jerk, then I'll gladly be one. You, however, lumped "street dudes" with Marbury, who's clearly missing a few screws upstairs. I find that offensive. So I'll continue to be a jerk, and you can continue to be ignorant.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

7/30/2007  12:06 PM
Posted by islesfan:

nixluva, what do you expect with your constant indefensible defending of anything Knick related? It's one thing to be a fan and another to be a complete sycophant ($10).

Programmed or Robotic
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

7/30/2007  12:08 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

where is a copy of the tape with marbury and bruce beck?

Are you asking for a link to that video?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
7/30/2007  12:14 PM
Tangential is not that special a word. I don't get why this is an attack on Code for using a pretty common word. And I don't get why everyone feels the need to defend Marbury's public appearances. He comes off like a fool. There's really no debate there. So all the "poor Marbury -- he gets criticized too much" stuff is pointless. He's a public figure. He makes tons of dough. If he doesn't want to be criticized so harshly for his poor communication skills he shouldn't do interviews - OR - here's a novel concept, he should learn how to communicate effectively in those settings. And anyone that knows me or has spoken to me, knows that I will slang my ish the F out -- but it's not the only way I talk. It's all about context. F keeping it real. You best believe I'm speaking "proper" at a big job interview.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/30/2007  12:15 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:

where is a copy of the tape with marbury and bruce beck?

Are you asking for a link to that video?

Please
RIP Crushalot😞
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

7/30/2007  12:20 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:

where is a copy of the tape with marbury and bruce beck?

Are you asking for a link to that video?

Please



LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/30/2007  12:46 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:

where is a copy of the tape with marbury and bruce beck?

Are you asking for a link to that video?

Please




Slightly peculiar. If many certain celebrity/politician type individuals said the word *ho* like that--it would be a potential career breaker. Other than that--it seemed as if he was domineering the show a bit[maybe because he has his own]but I don't see any evidence in anyway that he was on some kind of heavy-hitting drug[s]. To make my point clear--go watch the Tom Cruise interview on Oprah--because it was 10 times worse than this.
RIP Crushalot😞
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/30/2007  12:57 PM
Posted by islesfan:

nixluva, what do you expect with your constant indefensible defending of anything Knick related? It's one thing to be a fan and another to be a complete sycophant ($10).

You're entitled to your opinion about my posts, but I actually don't like everything about the team and never have. I make critical statements all the time, but they tend to be ignored by most. I started a thread that has a mostly critical slant to it. "What I Hope To Never See Again This New Season" During the season I had another thread where I was Critical of Isiah. "Enough already! Play Balkman and Collins".

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=20205

Even tho I often come to the defense of the team, I also make many statements about the teams obvious flaws and weaknesses and what they need to do to improve those areas. I've been critical of Isiah's in game coaching, how he dealt with Frye. I've been critical of Dolan and his disinterest in winning a title and only caring about the bottom line. The horrible perimeter D and inconsistent play. The poor starts etc.

The thing is that people tend to only remember the more frequent posts I make in defense of the team. To be honest I yell more at home watching the games with my sons, than I do here. It just doesn't come out here as much, but I have lots of complaints about this teams play. I don't have a problem with critical comments, but I don't like it when I feel people take it too far.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

7/30/2007  12:59 PM
BRIGGS maybe Tom was on something himself.

If you watch that interview and the one he did with Gus his demeanor was different and that stuff he said about I SAY UGH seeing the light, his sister's affect on him, the dance, and asking Beck to spit was COO-COO 4 COA-COA PUFFS!
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
freeskier
Posts: 20124
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 11/6/2006
Member: #1202

7/30/2007  4:27 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by nixluva:

he doesn't always speak using the Kings English.

Neither do we. The King's English is British English, which is not exactly entirely in America. Nontheless, what you're really trying to make excuses for is him not being 100% literate. Yet, literacy is often used as one measure of intelligence for people who have had the opportunity to go to school, which Marbury did. So, ultimately, it comes back to Marbury having low intelligence at some basic levels, since we can confirm he's not entirely literate. He has the potential to be more intelligent, which I think is what you really mean to say, but he has not exercised that potential, so ultimately, all criticism he gets for his speaking is justified. This is the main reason he shouldn't speak, or should make the effort to improve.

[Edited by - Solace on Jul 29 2007 10:20 PM]

i'm sorry did you just say that if you completed schooling but have bad communication skills then it is reasonable to assume you have a low intellect?
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/30/2007  5:20 PM
I enjoy making fun of Marbury as much as the next UK hater (if not more) but I don't think he's all that stupid. I'm not saying he's particularly smart, but I don't think he's as stupid as he appears to be.

I think Marbury is stubborn, which makes him resistant to learning, and like many wealthy and famous people, he has a particular reality which his support structure validates that is hard for many of us to relate to.


[Edited by - basketballjones on 07-30-2007 17:20]
https:// It's not so hard.
Ira
Posts: 24695
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
7/30/2007  7:31 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I enjoy making fun of Marbury as much as the next UK hater (if not more) but I don't think he's all that stupid. I'm not saying he's particularly smart, but I don't think he's as stupid as he appears to be.

I think Marbury is stubborn, which makes him resistant to learning, and like many wealthy and famous people, he has a particular reality which his support structure validates that is hard for many of us to relate to.


[Edited by - basketballjones on 07-30-2007 17:20]

He's not very articulate, but he seems to be in control of his life both on and off the court.

full marbury interview at msg.com

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy