Green (especailly) and Granger are both projected to go before 8. I'd take Wright, who's apparently the forgotten man on this forum. The Lakers moving up to take Bynum at 3? That's brilliant! Makes much more sense than them moving up to take Green who they worked out and is projected to go top six. Staying at 10 and taking Bynum, who is projected late 20's at best, makes no sense. They better give the Blazers all of their assets to take him at 3.
[Edited by - edsonline on 06/21/2005 10:50:01]
Pharzeone Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
Green is my choice but I would take Webster if he isn't there because I think Webster will be an all-star in this league in a couple of years. He seems to score at will which is what the NBA is now more impress with.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Masterplan Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
As far as Webster goes... there are lots of pure shooters in the NBA that are somewhat available via trade--- like Sczcerbiak. Can he create his own shot? Is he a one trick pony?
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
gunsnewing Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215 USA
As far as Webster goes... there are lots of pure shooters in the NBA that are somewhat available via trade--- like Sczcerbiak. Can he create his own shot? Is he a one trick pony?
you said exactly what I was going to say! I don't consider Allan Houston a pure scorer since all he can do is jumpshoot. A pure scorer like green, granger, graham and possibly Wright would help us a lot more than a jumpshooter would
crzymdups Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671 USA