the knicks would trade for michael redd. the bucks are in desperate need for a point guard. so...

Marbury
Sweetney
#30

For

Redd
Gadzuric
Gaines
----------
82 games passed but still a lot to mention/ this season was worse crawfords shot selection/ only 15 minutes a game going to Trevor Ariza!/ and Fat azz Sweetney fouls himself out, just to get a breather!/ Everybody is still wondering what is our GMs plan/ or whats worse a 9game losing streak or Marbs wearing a headband/ Kidd killed us in the media showing that are team is nothing but punks/ what I learned from this season is that Malik Rose can hardly dunk/ and finally when I think we found the center we wanted/ Zeke goes ahead and trades Nazr Mohammed/ I really think james dolan should get his azz kick/ not only did we lose 49 games but a chance at a #7 draft pick/ and nobody disgust me more than Houston and Penny Hardaway/ they not ballers, they should be working jobs, tryna make a penny the harder way/

I would never do that trade.

Mo Williams is a solid point guard. The Bucks don't need a point. To tell you the truth I dunno what that team needs because on paper that team should have been in the playoffs.

Micheal Redd would be nice but dude doesn't make his team better. He's just a shooter. He would easily be the missing piece to Denver or some team that needs a shooting guard.

Posted by Stevo718:

I would never do that trade.

Ditto

no, redd doesn't make others better but so far marbury has'nt either.

Pleeeeeease! Didn't you see how much he elevated Nazy's game? Actually, every starter had either their career averages or way above their career averages with Marbury as their PG. He made the players around him better, but they're just not good enough to win many games.

That's really not a bad trade at all. Redd is a young and tall shooting guard who brings us that consistent shooting that we really need and we get that center who actually plays defense, blocks shots and fills the lane on the break. Put Crawford at the point and draft Warrick, and that's actually really good. You can put Hakim at the 3 or 4. Let TT and Penny burn.

Eventually, you have a starting lineup that can look like:

C- Gadzurick
PF- Warrick
SF- Ariza
SG- Redd
PG- Crawford

That's a solid solid starting lineup that will only come to us in our dreams.

Posted by EwingsGlass:

Posted by Bonn1997:

no, redd doesn't make others better but so far marbury has'nt either.

Pleeeeeease! Didn't you see how much he elevated Nazy's game? Actually, every starter had either their career averages or way above their career averages with Marbury as their PG. He made the players around him better, but they're just not good enough to win many games.

None of that matters if you can't win games. Marbs has shown that he can't cary the team, and when he tries to spread the ball, they don't win. I don't like this trade, but it doesn't mean I dislike the idea of trading Marbs. Maybe we can pull a Phoenix.

No starter, no matter how good, can carry a team with 4 below average starters.

Posted by Allanfan20:

Marbury being able or not being able to carry a team is not the reason we make the trade.

I was just replying to Ewings' comment. Marbury not being able to single-handledly carry the team was a relevant fact to him, even if it's not to you.

No. I wouldn't trade Marbury for Redd. Wouldn't trade Sweetney for Gadz. Wouldn't trade the 30 for Reece Gaines. Gimme Milwaukee's lotto pick and now we're talking.