he's a gimp
he's owed $60 mil

but i ask you, if we could turn back the clock to february, which deals would you guys rather have done:

moved vin, moochie, nazr, + #2 for mo, malik, 2 late #1's (which i think will be moved)

OR

moved some combo of penny/kurt/vin/moochie for webber?

[Edited by - djsunyc on 05/01/2005 15:18:31]

Some posters (at least one) predicted there'd be a huge, sudden decline in the all-star PF's #s if he were put on a team with a PG who takes about 30 shots a game.

I wouldn't do either of those deals Feb because it wouldn't have been future-oriented like Isiah's usually been. It would just push the team to 38 or 40 wins and worse lottery pick this year.

Webber is now at KT's level, granteed kt is much tougher defensively, but on the offense end there ridicuosly limited.

I don't want him and we don't need him. DO we really need to ADD an injured star to our team? He wouldn't have helped much IMO. I am very glad Isiah blaked on that one.

Webber should miss soo much Sacramento! As for us, no I wouldn't have traded for him, not even Houston because I think H2O's contract ends a year before Web's. In my opinion Webber isn't a player for any team. He isn't for anyone's playbook. He needs a good passing team like Sac to take the best out of him. Now, Sac town did make a good trade.

About the trades we did, I have yet to see how they pan out. We brought more big contracts but we have yet to see who we can pick in the draft thanks to those trades. The Mo trade is bad to me, but thats just me...