[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

kidd, cwebb, h20 - which one doesn't fit?
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/10/2005  6:32 PM
question to all the medical dudes - why is it that all 3 had the same surgery yet cwebb is able to play for a long stretch of games (he can't practice and he's out now b/c of his shoulder), jkidd is able to play for a long stretch of games and with meaningful minutes, yet h20 can't play more than 20 games and may have to retire? what's the difference there? is it the rehab? or is it the p ssy factor?
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/10/2005  6:40 PM
well.. Webber is shot if you ask me. He was having a good year but the guy has zero lateral movement and is a lamp post on defense, where he used to be decent (not good but he played hard)

Houston's is arthritic. I know that, and that means it will just continue to degenerate.

Houston's always played through pain and hasnt missed game his whole career. I dont buy the pssy factor. If he isnt playing its because he cant
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/10/2005  6:50 PM
i agree w/fish...you all saw how bad he looked when he tried to give it a go earlier this season...it's just not there for him...it's sad how much he's degenerated the past couple years...God, i used to love watching him swish those jumpers down the other teams' throats...it was a thing of beauty.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/10/2005  6:50 PM
i agree, webber is shot but he's still playing. h20 could easily gimp around and just set up on the perimeter, like webber does but he doesn't. h20 just needs to retire and help this franchise out.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/10/2005  7:02 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i agree, webber is shot but he's still playing. h20 could easily gimp around and just set up on the perimeter, like webber does but he doesn't. h20 just needs to retire and help this franchise out.
Houston isnt 6-11 and his guys would blow by him and cause major problems for our defense. He proly still thinks he can play and if so, he should give it one more go. If not he should retire. His money doesn't come off the cap though, it just wouldn't have to be paid by Dolan, insurance would pay.

It would free up some cash for some other moves, like buying a pick or 2 in next years draft.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
4/10/2005  7:24 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

h20 could easily gimp around and just set up on the perimeter, like webber does but he doesn't.
please dont say that! What if it really happens?
h20 just needs to retire and help this franchise out.
agreed but unless his salaray or even a fraction of it comes off the cap there is no way he is helping the franchise. He is just saving Dolan some money. The same money Dolan promised him. Not Layden, Dolan! So if the money is not coming off the cap, I say, he should sit on the bench and eat his salary and screw Dolan for putting us through salary crap hell.
Posted by Killa4luv:

Houston isnt 6-11 and his guys would blow by him and cause major problems for our defense.
LOL! They were blowing by him even when he was healthy. His suffering defense is not the reason why he shouldnt play.
His money doesn't come off the cap though, it just wouldn't have to be paid by Dolan, insurance would pay.
Are you sure about this? I am almost certain that there is a way to get cap relief if a player under contract retires.

Although I dislike Allan Houston, I cannot blame him for not wanting to play. Him playing through an injury will not help this team much. Instead, him not playing allows Craw to get some playing time. Craw can run with Stephon as he has all season long. Thats valuable experience IMO.

Also, I dont think Allan Houston's condition will continue to degrade. I actually think if he rehabs differently and/or gets that 2nd surgery he was advised to go into 2 summers ago, he might be able to recover and get some playing time. Of course, Oldfan will tell me that I shouldnt say this because this is "3rd hand info" but I dont really care. I guess management wants him to retire.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/11/2005  11:32 PM
Kidd has his microfracture surgery on a non-weight-bearing part of the bone. That's why his recovery was much better. Webber's surgery was much longer ago and he's had more time to recover. He finally got to a point where he was looking very good this year in Sacramento. He also had much more athleticism than Houston to begin with.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
4/11/2005  11:36 PM
In football, Jason Sehorn came back fairly quickly from microfracture surgery, but never became the player he once was.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/11/2005  11:36 PM
Posted by Silverfuel:


Are you sure about this? I am almost certain that there is a way to get cap relief if a player under contract retires.
Yes I am pretty sure. Thats why we were paying for Luc Longley, its why Philly is still paying for Todd McCoullogh (who I wanted the knicks to get). It make a difference to the owners not to our cap. But if he saved clode to 60 million he would proly be willing to go even higher above the cap! We could be the 200 million dollar team!
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
4/12/2005  12:32 AM
a few things from a medical/ sports injury perspective:

1) houstons knees/injury might have been worse than kidds and webbs to begin with

2) the surgeons might have not been the same quality

3) the rehabs might have been different

4) houston coming back several times before he was ready and reinjuring the same knee over and over, then over compensating on the other knee would have only worsened the problem.

TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
4/12/2005  7:48 AM
Rememeber Grant Hill-took him a while-Hopefully the offseason will give Allan the cure time he apparently needs. How many games would the sweet shot have meant for us? How many better pure shooter are there when he's healthy, gets his elevation and rhythm. Dogging it? I think not-his record speaks for itself-he didn't suddenly become a hypocondriac-his game relies more on movement and jumping ability than many plus none of us are privy the the comparative medical indcia of the any of the players mentioned.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
4/12/2005  7:52 AM
Posted by Caseloads:

a few things from a medical/ sports injury perspective:

1) houstons knees/injury might have been worse than kidds and webbs to begin with

2) the surgeons might have not been the same quality

3) the rehabs might have been different

4) houston coming back several times before he was ready and reinjuring the same knee over and over, then over compensating on the other knee would have only worsened the problem.
Does this mean he will leave and never come back again or does this mean he will stay till the end of his contract?
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
4/12/2005  7:52 AM
I hear ya Sage. I'm a big Allan fan myself. I still think he would have made a big difference too. THat shot aginst Phily this year? Whew!
kidd, cwebb, h20 - which one doesn't fit?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy