[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

You wanna rebuild this team aka My turn to make a crazy trade suggestion:
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/7/2005  12:41 AM
Marbury and Sweets for Maggette and Wilcox. Clips are under the cap next season and can absorb the difference (also they need to add salary to get to the MINIMUM cap requirement and this trade does it).

If Maggette is really unhappy, this gets him out. Clips never liked Wilcox and Sweets is a decent replacement. The Clips get an all-star caliber PG who excels in the halfcourt where Brand and Kaman also excel. They re-sign Kittles for low money or they play Marbs next to Jaric. Either way, it buys them time to bring Livingston along slowly (who is turning out to be a bust or at least a slow bloomer).

Why do the Knicks do it? Get some athletic size on the perimeter and inside. Maggette is an all-star caliber SG. Jamal slides over to play the point. The Knicks can then grab a Deron Williams or a Raymond Felton in the lotto. Wilcox becomes the starting center, or whatever, next to Kurt.

Listen, I love Marbs but while he just may be the best point guard in the league talent-wise, he's not a leader and that's while he'll never be a superstar. I would hate to lose him, but this is a great package to get back for him. Honestly, we all know Zeke will NEVER trade Marbury, his crown jewel, but the thread about Zeke stepping down got me thinking....what IF we could move Marbury, what could we really get for him? Maggette is signed long-term to LOW money. Wilcox is still in his rookie deal. Both are big and athletic.


Jamal, Deron Williams (8th pick)
Maggette, Penny
Ariza, TT
Wilcox, Rose, JYD
KT, Frye (29th pick)

I know people will freak out, but if I have to read one more Sweetney for Brand trade proposal, I'll scream. This trade is actually pretty realistic and pretty fair for both sides.

As I say, use the first pick on a PG like Felton or Deron. Then use the second pick on some athletic size like Frye, Simien, Turiaf, Blatche.
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
4/7/2005  1:37 AM
I don't get why LA wants Sweetney when Brand plays a similar game but much better. Even though Wilcox doesn't get much burn hes a better type of player to complement Brand...it makes no sense to invest in a young mediocre post player when you have a stellar one who is a few years older.
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/7/2005  1:44 AM
I wouldn't call Wilcox stellar, but yeah, he's better than Sweets. LAC would have to really like Marbury to do this trade. Honestly, I do think he would fit well with Simmons, Brand and Kaman.
¿ △ ?
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
4/7/2005  4:25 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

I wouldn't call Wilcox stellar, but yeah, he's better than Sweets. LAC would have to really like Marbury to do this trade. Honestly, I do think he would fit well with Simmons, Brand and Kaman.
i was talking about wilcox, i was talking about brand - brand is a stellar post guy. wilcox is pretty good but hes a better fit along with brand than sweetney would be
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
4/7/2005  6:47 AM
You are right, that was a crazy trade suggestion....
The true Knickabocker..........
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/7/2005  6:49 AM
Posted by diderotn:

You are right, that was a crazy trade suggestion....
Yeah, it's possible for a player (Marbury) to have one losing season but to still be awesome and worth keeping unless you get a better superstar in return.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
4/7/2005  7:00 AM
Marburry is not the problem, his surrounding or supportive cast is what needs to be fixed. Kurt, Crawf, TT, Penny, Houston, all need to go. Marb needs consistant shooters and post players around him to be effective. You can't expect him to score, run the show, play defense, and take over games at the end. Even Jordan had a great supporting cast around him. Pippen, Grant, Kerr, Paxon, were all efficient at what they do best.


Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by diderotn:

You are right, that was a crazy trade suggestion....
Yeah, it's possible for a player (Marbury) to have one losing season but to still be awesome and worth keeping unless you get a better superstar in return.
The true Knickabocker..........
SKY
Posts: 20356
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2004
Member: #687
USA
4/7/2005  8:18 AM
I like it.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
4/7/2005  8:46 AM
Except Marbury has a multitude of loosing seasons.

Maybe he is just not a winning player, and by that I mean, not a guy who is no capable of winning a title, but a guy who is not capable of playing .500 ball. Aka the Rahim of PG's.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/7/2005  9:14 AM
you said something very different on my thread a few days ago discussing possible trade options to get these 2 guys...why the change of heart?:

http://ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?page=3&t=8716

crzymdups
Posts: 1195
Joined: 05/01/2004 Posted - 04/04/2005 : 14:56:57 Show Profile Reply with Quote the ridiculous issue here is that you guys always seem to want the star players after they "pop."

the problem is, once a player pops, his price tag (i.e. what you have to trade to get him) goes waaaaaay up. Maggette was a 13th pick in the draft back in the day. Now, we'd have to trade the 7th pick plus other stuff to get him. Doesn't that seem messed up? I'd rather draft Taft and have him develop to the point where he's a player we could never acquire in a trade. That's the whole point of the draft - pluck superstars before their price tag goes up too high.

this team needs a lot more than Corey Maggette. It needs size, shot blocking, defense at almost every position and athleticism. With the draft picks we have, we can add two young, big horses this year basically for free. Add them to the core of Marbury, Ariza, Sweets, Jamal and you might have something. Overpaying for a nice player on a bad team is not the way to go. We already overpaid for Marbs, now we have to restock through the draft.

[Edited by - TMS on 04/07/2005 09:14:53]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/7/2005  10:48 AM
Posted by TMS:

you said something very different on my thread a few days ago discussing possible trade options to get these 2 guys...why the change of heart?:

http://ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?page=3&t=8716

crzymdups
Posts: 1195
Joined: 05/01/2004 Posted - 04/04/2005 : 14:56:57 Show Profile Reply with Quote the ridiculous issue here is that you guys always seem to want the star players after they "pop."

the problem is, once a player pops, his price tag (i.e. what you have to trade to get him) goes waaaaaay up. Maggette was a 13th pick in the draft back in the day. Now, we'd have to trade the 7th pick plus other stuff to get him. Doesn't that seem messed up? I'd rather draft Taft and have him develop to the point where he's a player we could never acquire in a trade. That's the whole point of the draft - pluck superstars before their price tag goes up too high.

this team needs a lot more than Corey Maggette. It needs size, shot blocking, defense at almost every position and athleticism. With the draft picks we have, we can add two young, big horses this year basically for free. Add them to the core of Marbury, Ariza, Sweets, Jamal and you might have something. Overpaying for a nice player on a bad team is not the way to go. We already overpaid for Marbs, now we have to restock through the draft.

[Edited by - TMS on 04/07/2005 09:14:53]

The ability to get Wilcox. The fact that the Clippers would stop and think about this trade before hanging up. The realization that Marbury may be part of the problem, and even if he isn't this trade is trading Marbury for two players who would easily be the best two players on the team.

We have a glut at the PG, Jamal isn't a real SG and has proven he can be a good if not very good PG. Corey and Jamal is a better, more balanced backcourt than Steph and Jamal, not because Corey is better than Steph, but because Corey and Jamal have balanced games and good size.

It's time to start thinking about building a team of COMPLIMENTARY players that fit together and make sense.

Also, TMS, the more I thought about it, the more I liked your trade, but I felt like we would have to GIVE more to get that package.
¿ △ ?
bigpimpin
Posts: 22176
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 11/17/2004
Member: #801
USA
4/7/2005  10:56 AM
If you put consistent shooters and post players around ANY point guard and the results will be the same!

I can't believe you wrote that
"Anyone who sits around waiting to hit the lottery, whether basketball or real life, in order to better their position is a loser."
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
4/7/2005  11:14 AM
My crazy trade suggestion is:

KT, Sweetney, Penny and SA's #1 next year

for

Odom and Grant

LA does it to get rid of Grant's contract, gain a young PF and a consistent vet PF, plus they gain a first-round pick.

This is far-fetched isn't it? I hate fake messageboard trade scenarios... Anyway, if they did this, I could see the Knicks drafting a C with their lottery pick and then a sharp shooter with the late first rounder. The team would kinda look like this:

C - Lottery Pick, Grant
PF - Odom, Rose, Taylor
SF - Thomas, Ariza, JYD
SG - Craw, Late First Rounder
PG - Marbury, FA Pickup

Eh, I'm only posting this because I took the time to put it together, but I doubt it'll happen. Maybe one of you guys can come up with a modification on this theme (or maybe this is a modification on someone else's idea).

In closing, I leave you all with an NYK Lymric:

There once was team from The City
Whose seasons were terribly Sh!tty
Their fans concoct trades
That will never be made
The Knicks are doomed what a pity...
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/7/2005  12:10 PM
Posted by simrud:

Except Marbury has a multitude of loosing seasons.

Maybe he is just not a winning player, and by that I mean, not a guy who is no capable of winning a title, but a guy who is not capable of playing .500 ball. Aka the Rahim of PG's.
Not capable of playing .500 ball? Don't make stuff up. This is Marbury's first year in a loooong time that he won't make the playoffs.
SKY
Posts: 20356
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2004
Member: #687
USA
4/7/2005  12:14 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by TMS:

you said something very different on my thread a few days ago discussing possible trade options to get these 2 guys...why the change of heart?:

http://ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?page=3&t=8716

crzymdups
Posts: 1195
Joined: 05/01/2004 Posted - 04/04/2005 : 14:56:57 Show Profile Reply with Quote the ridiculous issue here is that you guys always seem to want the star players after they "pop."

the problem is, once a player pops, his price tag (i.e. what you have to trade to get him) goes waaaaaay up. Maggette was a 13th pick in the draft back in the day. Now, we'd have to trade the 7th pick plus other stuff to get him. Doesn't that seem messed up? I'd rather draft Taft and have him develop to the point where he's a player we could never acquire in a trade. That's the whole point of the draft - pluck superstars before their price tag goes up too high.

this team needs a lot more than Corey Maggette. It needs size, shot blocking, defense at almost every position and athleticism. With the draft picks we have, we can add two young, big horses this year basically for free. Add them to the core of Marbury, Ariza, Sweets, Jamal and you might have something. Overpaying for a nice player on a bad team is not the way to go. We already overpaid for Marbs, now we have to restock through the draft.

[Edited by - TMS on 04/07/2005 09:14:53]

The ability to get Wilcox. The fact that the Clippers would stop and think about this trade before hanging up. The realization that Marbury may be part of the problem, and even if he isn't this trade is trading Marbury for two players who would easily be the best two players on the team.

We have a glut at the PG, Jamal isn't a real SG and has proven he can be a good if not very good PG. Corey and Jamal is a better, more balanced backcourt than Steph and Jamal, not because Corey is better than Steph, but because Corey and Jamal have balanced games and good size.

It's time to start thinking about building a team of COMPLIMENTARY players that fit together and make sense.

Also, TMS, the more I thought about it, the more I liked your trade, but I felt like we would have to GIVE more to get that package.

yes, right on.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/7/2005  1:11 PM
fair enough crzymdups...i completely agree w/posters like u & fish who've been saying that we need to build an identity on this team...no more of these trades that make no sense from that perspective...stick to 1 vision & 1 plan...if we're going to be an uptempo, run & gun style team, get some players who will thrive in that style game & a coach who knows how to run it...if we're going to be a slow it down, half court, pick & roll style team, then make moves to make this team fit that style game...let's see these guys take on an identity like the Knicks of old used to have when Ewing, Oakley, Mason, Starks & Harper were led by Pat Riley to be the best defensive team in the game...everyone knew they were going to be in for war when they came into the Garden...these days, no one respects these Knicks...i'm tired of watching guys like Kenyon Martin slam dunking the ball at will on these guys & smirking while doing it.

(on second thought, can we trade for K-Mart in the offseason?)
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/7/2005  1:25 PM
K marts contract is ridiculous, I don't want it. I'd rather have camby's which is shorter, for less money, and his style of play is exactly what we need.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/7/2005  1:42 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:

K marts contract is ridiculous, I don't want it. I'd rather have camby's which is shorter, for less money, and his style of play is exactly what we need.

yeah it is ridiculous...but i'd rather take a guy like that who's not coming w/off the court issues who plays hard every night & is an impact player on the defensive end than a guy like Zach Randolph for example, who not only has character issues, but also questions about his knees as well.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/7/2005  1:50 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Killa4luv:

K marts contract is ridiculous, I don't want it. I'd rather have camby's which is shorter, for less money, and his style of play is exactly what we need.

yeah it is ridiculous...but i'd rather take a guy like that who's not coming w/off the court issues who plays hard every night & is an impact player on the defensive end than a guy like Zach Randolph for example, who not only has character issues, but also questions about his knees as well.
What's the difference between Zach's character issues and Garnett's or Kidd's other than that Garnett gets away with punching teammates and Kidd gets away with punching his wife because their teams win?

The knee is only a minor concern. A lot of people assume that all surgeries are the same. This is arthroscopic surger, which usually takes 6 weeks tops to recover from. It's comparable to what Ewing had his rookie year.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/7/2005  2:02 PM
No I dont think you understand K Marts contract:

$11,000,000 this season

$16,625,000 in 2010/2011 season!!!

I like K Mart, I like his game, but I don't think he will have the impact with our collection of players, that I would like to see considering how much money he makes. Thats about 1 million less than Zach Randolph. Zach is a franchise talent and Kmart is not, and will never be. Thats just too much money. Even if we signed Curry or Tyson Chandler they wouldn't be making tht much.
You wanna rebuild this team aka My turn to make a crazy trade suggestion:

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy