Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
joec32033
Posts: 30528 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
3/29/2005 10:40 AM
Posted by diderotn: All respect to guns and everyone else who says that the contracts are ok as long as they expire by Allan's contract, I don't buy into that thinking necessarily. Once again, we'll have $40 mil in expiring contracts, but we either have to take back that $40 in trades (and there is no way we get that many players for Allan and TT their salaries are just TOO high...I mean SacTown struck gold getting what they got for Webber but what are the chances two teams would want to do that same thing in the same season?) On top of that if we let the deals come off the books, we still got close to the cap with Steph, Craw, Ariza, Swettney, KT, Jerome, and Rose. (for the record, cap is around $44 mil this year, so with inflation, maybe we are talking about 47 mil in 3 years?) Because we got Allan's contract is no excuse to me to continue to overpay players that honestly don't deserve it. TT, in my eyes doesn't deserve it. http://www.insidehoops.com/nba-salary-cap.shtml [Edited by - joec32033 on 03/29/2005 10:42:52] ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
fishmike
Posts: 53199 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
3/29/2005 12:26 PM
yes to herb... no no no to TT
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|