Posted by rvhoss:
Recently, when Ariza plays less then 16 minutes, the knicks have won all 5 games. When he plays over 17 we have 2 wins and 8 losses (both stats since february 1) Since february 22nd (the last time he played over 20 minutes), we are 5 and 3.
We have to differentiate between developing Ariza and winning games Now.
I'm for winning games by any means necessary, even if it's at the expense of a rookie's playing time...that's just how I roll. =)
[Edited by - rvhoss on 03/15/2005 11:33:16]
It's not really fair to assume that Ariza is directly responsible for those losses. I'm too lazy to go in and find out what games he played more than 20 minutes in, but that was during that free fall the team went through. Plus, I would assume he was given plenty of garbage minutes during that stretch. It's just an unfortunate cooincidence that he isn't getting the minutes since the team has been rejuvinated by the trades.
I still believe Trevor can help us win games more so than Penny, or even more than Jamal (atleast on his cold nights).
Unless we're making some serious damage this year, I don't see a point in not playing him when it's questionable if he is even any worse than the vets getting minutes.