[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

is boozer available for the expiring contracts?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/1/2005  10:58 PM
penny + sweets + 2005 spurs #1 for boozer? is that enough? and is he the player we should be targeting (w/ rose, mo, jyd still here)with that expiring deal b/c isiah IS going to use it...

[Edited by - djsunyc on 03/01/2005 23:03:32]
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2005  11:30 PM
He's one player we should definitely be targetting, but we'd probably have to give up more than you listed. If our lottery pick is in the 9 to 12 range, I think he's one of many players you try to get by giving up the lottery pick, Sweetney, and expiring contracts. I've been debating whether I'd prefer to go after Boozer or Zach Randolph. I think Zach's more talented and has more upside, but Boozer is more dependable, plays harder on defense, and has a better attitude (especially off the court). I think Marbury would really elevate their games. Neither of them has ever played a guard with Marbury's playmaking abilities. (Lebron was just a rookie getting 5.9 APG last year.)
martin
Posts: 78935
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/1/2005  11:32 PM
i really like Boozer's game but I don't think trading Sweets for him is worth it. Sweets is a pure back to the basket player, and those a rare to find in the NBA these days. With a post player, you can do inside-outside offense to death and get fouls.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/1/2005  11:33 PM
you are crazy my friend boozer does not play defense. we have a PF we have otherglaring needs like a C
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2005  11:39 PM
Posted by martin:

i really like Boozer's game but I don't think trading Sweets for him is worth it. Sweets is a pure back to the basket player, and those a rare to find in the NBA these days. With a post player, you can do inside-outside offense to death and get fouls.
At this point Boozer is more effective in the low post than Sweetney and is obviously much quicker on defense. Boozer's able to put up close to 20/10 without a decent PG to set up plays for him. If Sweetney could lose 25 pounds, he might be as effective as Boozer or even more effective than Boozer. But for two years we've been saying that he needs to lose weight and he's made no progress
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2005  11:40 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

you are crazy my friend boozer does not play defense. we have a PF we have otherglaring needs like a C
Boozer plays solid defense; he just doesn't block many shots. I never said we need to ignore the needs at C. That's a different topic.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/1/2005  11:43 PM
well i heard the jazz are not happy about his defense.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2005  11:46 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

well i heard the jazz are not happy about his defense.
The Jazz are idiots. They can't afford to pay Boozer what he's being paid and they need to get rid of him just one season after getting him. For a team very concerned about payroll, he's probably not worth the contract he got.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 03/01/2005 23:49:26]
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
3/1/2005  11:50 PM
there's a much cheaper boozer in the draft.(simien) but the last thing we need is another pf, unless he's a shotblocker.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/1/2005  11:57 PM
I want no part of Boozer. Not only is he yet another PF, he isn't a franchise player, he's owed a ton of money and most importantly he doesn't solve our athletic shotblocker/defender C problem.
martin
Posts: 78935
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/2/2005  12:16 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by martin:

i really like Boozer's game but I don't think trading Sweets for him is worth it. Sweets is a pure back to the basket player, and those a rare to find in the NBA these days. With a post player, you can do inside-outside offense to death and get fouls.
At this point Boozer is more effective in the low post than Sweetney and is obviously much quicker on defense. Boozer's able to put up close to 20/10 without a decent PG to set up plays for him. If Sweetney could lose 25 pounds, he might be as effective as Boozer or even more effective than Boozer. But for two years we've been saying that he needs to lose weight and he's made no progress

Dude is only in the second year of his rookie conctract. You keep him for the potential - kinda like Portland not giving up on Jermaine - and see what happens. The Knicks already have Rose, KT, JYD, MT.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/2/2005  12:17 AM
Before the trade deadline, Boozer would have been a good asset, but right now, we don't need him with all the power fowards we have. Right now, we have to be working on the backup backcourt positions and we need a center, and decide if Ariza is our starting small foward of the future, or if we need to find our starting 3 of the future somewhere else. Boozer is nice, but he's not gonna make this team much better if you replace him with Sweetney.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/2/2005  12:39 AM
we have 90 PF's, it's absolutley ludicrous to think we need another one. is there a thing that we have to trade picks, young players ending contracts just to do so? things change when we got mo taylor and malik to go along with Sweetney, we now have no need for any 4 unless his name is Duncan or Garnet. Sweetney and taylor combined will score more points than Boozer in 48 minutes by far. since boozer is a weak defender, we have 0 need for him or zach randolph anymore.

Do people pay attention? we just traded for

A 10mm $ post up scoring 4
B a 7mm dollar defensive 3-4
C we already have a young up and coming 4 with little cost
D JYD and KT are really 4s

so unless we get a 7 footer, why do we need a 4?

are we saying that we bought Taylor just to look at him?
RIP Crushalot😞
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
3/2/2005  12:46 AM
for sure, we dont need anymore pfs...how about a 7 footer. jazz with boozer may be not be needed with ak47 and memo. and how needed is kmart
in denver?
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
3/2/2005  1:03 AM
We have too many needs to give up that much for Boozer.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
3/2/2005  6:30 AM
Posted by martin:

Sweets is a pure back to the basket player, and those a rare to find in the NBA these days.
good point
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
3/2/2005  7:18 AM
Why would you want to trade for Boozer? He's led the Jazz to a worse record than the Knicks.

Seriously, though, what does he really offer? Boozer has role-player written all over him. His defense is VERY overrated. Sloan complains about his defense and for good reason. In Cleveland, some of Boozer's flaws were masked by playing next to Zydrunas Ilgauskas. He gets a similar luxury when playing next to Kirilenko, who is a defensive monster. When those guys are out of the lineup, Boozer is truly exposed.

In all honesty, IMHO, Boozer has already peaked. He's a guy who puts up 18 and 8.5 on a team with no scorers. If the Jazz had more quality players who could score, Boozer would put up more like 14 and 9. Sweetney is still progressing. Sweetney could easily put up 16 and 9 next year alone if he maintains a starting role and be MUCH more of a force on offense. Sweetney's ceiling is yet to be determined. Boozer is already at his.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/2/2005  7:22 AM
Posted by Solace:

Why would you want to trade for Boozer? He's led the Jazz to a worse record than the Knicks.

Seriously, though, what does he really offer? Boozer has role-player written all over him. His defense is VERY overrated. Sloan complains about his defense and for good reason. In Cleveland, some of Boozer's flaws were masked by playing next to Zydrunas Ilgauskas. He gets a similar luxury when playing next to Kirilenko, who is a defensive monster. When those guys are out of the lineup, Boozer is truly exposed.

In all honesty, IMHO, Boozer has already peaked. He's a guy who puts up 18 and 8.5 on a team with no scorers. If the Jazz had more quality players who could score, Boozer would put up more like 14 and 9. Sweetney is still progressing. Sweetney could easily put up 16 and 9 next year alone if he maintains a starting role and be MUCH more of a force on offense. Sweetney's ceiling is yet to be determined. Boozer is already at his.

good post. i agree. dont see boozer getting any better.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/2/2005  9:32 AM
Absoultley agree about not getting Boozer.

I always fealt he was overrated. Was suprised when he got that much money from Utah.

I also heard he does not play defense, that's why Sloan is goggin himand wanted to trade him for practically nothing.

Also, we do have a billion PF's, we can't waste our assets getting yet another one. And one w/out real post game or shotblocking btw.

All he is a rebounder who gets his points on dunks, and ocasional jumpers, do we really need that?

Sweetney and even the horrible Mo Taylo raddress more immediate needs then Boozer.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/2/2005  9:54 AM
I liked him but we have ZERO need and his D sucks. I watched him away from the ball a lot when I was at the Utah game and he's too average.

PF has obviously been a big issue but with Herb starting MS and rotating in guys that give you great hustle and have good size we are fine there.

We should be looking at a good center prospect and at replacing TT and Penny in this draft. I really like Joey Graham at SF a lot. I would also look at a deal where we send TT + cash + the Spurs picks to GS for Foyal and Pietrus. Foyal is a great guy, and a good shot blocker. Not skilled but a BIG body that clogs the middle and can alter shots. Pietrus is a chisled G/F that is a GREAT defender, decent scorer and superior athlete on this level.

Then you go into next year with a balanced roster with no holes and great depth.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
is boozer available for the expiring contracts?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy