Layden, Grunfeld, and Checketts all contributed to this salary cap fiasco, being far over the cap with aging players. With notable exceptions such as Ewing, Jackson, and Ward Knicks have not made good draft picks. Trade wise, Oak from Chicago was an excellent trade. They would have been better holding on to him since he is stronger and more durable than Camby, although I'm a big fan of both. Acquiring Houston and Sprewell was good also. Even though I like Johnson, Rice, and Weatherspoon, they were all acquired past their prime. The Knicks could have picked up Eddie Robinson from Charlotte according to Deb Kaufman of MSG. He would received about the same amount as Spoon, but is younger, more athletic, and a better prospect. New York is a win now team according to Knicks management so they have chosen instant results rather than holding on to players. It might be time to change after last year's results and developing a younger team based on Thomas, Sprewell, and Houston.
I think the Camby-Oakly trade has proven its worth. If anything, wasn't it Camby who got us past Indiana to reach the finals?
I have to whole-heartedly disagree with Deb Kaufman's assesment that the Knicks could have gotten Eddit Robinson: Where is a skinny 6'9" small forward going to play in the NY lineup. After Sprewell, Rice, Thomas, Harrington, LJ get their minutes? He wanted to go to a team where he could get minutes and Chicago was the place. NY would have been the same situation as Charlotte, a winnning situation, but one with limited minutes.