this year mistake of building the back of the bench with the guys we did was really dumb. i dont understand if we are a rebuilding team why we would use the MLE on Baker? I mean it makes 0000sense!


I dont care what we have to do, buy a draft pick for 2mm and trade Kt for another, but we need to bring in 3 guys who can stay together for years abnd rebuild the back end of the core--hopefully to get 1 into the starting LU. I said Im VERY VERY high on wayne simien at PF--its going to be a need because IM hoping KT will be long gone and I would like to get something different for Sweetney if we can. I like Nate Robinson, hes a bit small in staure but will be a wild player to control in the nBA, he truly is a mini dwayne wade who can be our back up PG. and lastly we need a powerfully athletic wing who can score with effeciency and DEFEND DEFEND DEFEND TOUGHNESS---my pick Joey Graham of Okla St who can also shift to PF in a speedy line up.




But I think this is a big need--we need to put together a draft where we make the calls, we can get the players we like without spending a billion $ and so that they can stay together and build chemistry together.

this year mistake of building the back of the bench with the guys we did was really dumb. i dont understand if we are a rebuilding team why we would use the MLE on Baker?

How many times do you have to ask the same question about Baker. Signing Baker was part of rebuilding because it was implicitly part of the Crawford deal. (It was only a portion of the MLE--not the full MLE--on Baker, BTW.)

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01/13/2005 01:22:50]