[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

setting the record straight
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30124
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
1/6/2005  9:28 AM
I am tired of hearing these distortions of the facts that
people say, the KVH trade was worth it because of Mohammed.

The trade was NOT Nazr for KVH.

The trade was:
NY traded Keith Van Horn to Milwaukee.
NY traded Michael Doleac and a 2005 2nd-round pick to Atlanta.
NY acquired Tim Thomas from Milwaukee.
NY acquired Nazr Mohammed from Atlanta.

Atlanta acquired Doleac and 2005 2nd-round pick from the Knicks.
Atlanta acquired Joel Przybilla from Milwaukee.


So Atlanta traded Mohammed for Doleac, Przybilla, and a second round
pick.

At that point, Przybilla, in his fourth year, had appeared in only five games for the Bucks this season, scoring one point.
Has career 2 PPG/4 RPG averages. In other words, he's a bag of
peanuts.

So while technically, yes, it was a three way deal, you can
essentially look at this deal as 2 separate deals. We definitely
could have supplied an equivalent of Przybilla to Atlanta to do
that deal on its own. So as far as I'm concerned it was:
1) KVH for TT
2) Doleac, 2nd round pick, and a bag of peanuts for Mohammed.

And while I agree that virtual trade #2 was a bargain,
I will judge trade #1 separately, and so far its been a complete bust. I don't mean to be living in the past, just wanted to set the
record straight. I'll give credit where credit is due, but
I'm not going to grant free passes on distorted facts.

Imagine an alternate present:
Mohammed/KT
KVH/Sweetney
JYD/Ariza/Penny
Houston/Crawford/Penny
Marbs/Crawford/Penny

Not only do the stats tell part of the story:
(2004: KVH 17/8 vs. TT 10/3.5)
but KVH was playing well with Marbs, had a presence on the court
while here in NY, and hit clutch shots for us.
TT has YET to find a roll on this team.

So when we discuss the(se) trade(s) let's try to keep it real.
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76510
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/6/2005  9:39 AM
I am not completely up on the info for this three-way, but Isiah has repeatedly said that he would NOT have traded KVH if Nazr wasn't coming to NY.... so I think everyone has assumed that it was an all or nothing thing, even if it was 2 separate transactions.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/6/2005  9:59 AM
"The trade was NOT Nazr for KVH."

Yes it was. The bottom line is Joel was just a $$ deal for the Hawks but that made it happen. The Knicks traded KVH and Doleac and got back TT and NAzr. How is that not real and why do you care?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Panos
Posts: 30124
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
1/6/2005  10:03 AM
Posted by fishmike:

"The trade was NOT Nazr for KVH."

Yes it was. The bottom line is Joel was just a $$ deal for the Hawks but that made it happen. The Knicks traded KVH and Doleac and got back TT and NAzr. How is that not real and why do you care?

Fine then forget Joel.
It was 1) KVH for TT
and 2) Doleac of Nazr.
We could have done the trade with Atlanta without the trade
with Milwaukee. That is my point.
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/6/2005  10:40 AM
Doleac for Nazr doesnt work under the cap. Doleac was making the LLE which is about $1.5mm. Nazr was making just over $5mm. Thats the point. TT makes less than KVH, so ONLY the TT/KVH part of it made it possible to absorb the extra $$$ that Nazr makes.

TT for KVH works, but Doleac for Nazr doesnt, unless its all part of one transaction.

If you want to say Atl would have taken Doleac for Nazr I would agree, but we would have to include another $3mm, and we didnt have players to make that work (maybe Sweetney?).

The only way NAzr is a Knick is if TT/KVH are included.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/6/2005  11:55 AM
And furthermore, hindsight is 20/20. KVH has played all of 13 games this season. Yeah his numbers are way better, but they weren't at the time of the trade. And further more he is on a losing team so those numbers aren't real. But I will go on the record as sayin I really liked how he played for us.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/6/2005  4:47 PM
Man, Milwaulkee is such a garbage team now that no one can say any recent move has worked out well for them
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
1/6/2005  5:14 PM
I'd take tt for kvh any day.
all kool aid all the time.
MaTT4281
Posts: 34915
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
1/6/2005  5:16 PM
Can we put all of these discussions on hold until after the playoffs?
(Well, of course Milwaukee would actually have to make the playoffs to see KVH's anual decline)
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/6/2005  6:30 PM
Why don't we just stick one thread on the Nazy, TT, Doleac, VAn Horn thread at the top of the forum so that we don't have to have so many new threads?
setting the record straight

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy