Trevor Ariza
Nazr Muhamed
Vin Baker

for
Eddy Curry
Adrian Griffin
Othella Harington

It works on the trade checker and it makes sense too.

We cannot give up sweets, but Nazzy + Ariza for Curry seems fair to me.
Would Zeke do it? Would you guys do it?

He's a talented guy, but I'm uncomfortable about getting inside players who play soft.

Killa, you don't like Ariza, do you?

I don't think the Bulls do it as they have enough talent at the 3.

I have not paid too much attention to the Bulls, but here goes: I think the Bulls will trade 1 of Curry or Chandler. One is a back to the basket player, one is more of a face the basket/weak-side defender/off the blocks player.

If you trade Curry, you want a young big in return who can play the post. To me that means Sweets. Looking at the roster a little bit more, the Bulls have no bigs with experience. Zero. OK, Antonio Davis, but he is a shell of his former self. I would want C/F who is a stable rock with an OK contract. Kurt fits that fill. I would also probably need a little more because I would have to admit that drafting high school kids was a failure. I would need a late first rounder or high second rounder.

Curry/throw-ins for Sweets, Kurt, #1. As a Bull GM, that's what I would want.

Posted by Killa4luv:

I like sweets so much more than Ariza. I think sweets has so much more of an upside. I really don't want to trade sweets at all, unless it is for a proven bac to the basket PF/C, but as far as prospects I think he is pretty damn good.

Ariza hater!
But really, Ariza probably has more upside than Sweetney just because of the positions they play and comparing their physical gifts for their respective positions....