[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

GameThread: Another late night, Knicks @ Kings 10:30PM
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 5  1  2  3 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
SergioNYK
Posts: 22390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
3/10/2025  10:48 AM

AUTOADVERT
SergioNYK
Posts: 22390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
3/10/2025  10:52 AM
No Sabonis or Monk and they played last night so we should win this!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/10/2025  11:04 AM
SergioNYK wrote:No Sabonis or Monk and they played last night so we should win this!

Should! And I hope, though the Knicks are right now proving how much Jalen is worth for the team and should be in the MVP conversation- certainly ALL NBA TEAM!
nycericanguy
Posts: 21421
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2023
Member: #9127
3/10/2025  11:13 AM
Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  11:21 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/10/2025  11:23 AM
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

I've barely watched LaVine but supersized DDV seems right. I see the assists, is it because of his usage or because he is a willing ball mover?

The one thing I loved about DDV is that he wanted to make the assist first if it was there. He obviously was a gunner too but I always thought he was the perfect hockey assist guy on the team. Knicks need that. Mikal and OG certainly have those moments but DDV was king at that while also being a spacer threat.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39450
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
3/10/2025  12:15 PM
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

There was nothing dirt cheap about Lavine. He's averaging well over $40M a year for the next two years following this one. You need defenders around KAT and Brunson. Even at their worst, OG and Brikal are way better defensively than Lavine.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
nycericanguy
Posts: 21421
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2023
Member: #9127
3/10/2025  12:23 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

There was nothing dirt cheap about Lavine. He's averaging well over $40M a year for the next two years following this one. You need defenders around KAT and Brunson. Even at their worst, OG and Brikal are way better defensively than Lavine.

i meant in terms of trade cost, CHI basically got ONE 1st for him.

all of these guys are expensive in terms of $ now.

I think we have enough good individual defenders. just need to defend better as a team.
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  12:33 PM
nycericanguy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

There was nothing dirt cheap about Lavine. He's averaging well over $40M a year for the next two years following this one. You need defenders around KAT and Brunson. Even at their worst, OG and Brikal are way better defensively than Lavine.

i meant in terms of trade cost, CHI basically got ONE 1st for him.

all of these guys are expensive in terms of $ now.

I think we have enough good individual defenders. just need to defend better as a team.

IMO Knicks have elite wing defenders. They have caca for rim protectors outside of Mitch. Big time weakness until both Mitch and Huk and whomever are in the rotation.

I think we fans sometimes conflate what OG and Mikal are doing for lack of the back line protection that KAT is obviously not able to even pretend to do. Those guys can't do both and be counted on for offense. That trifecta is too much.

2 things Knicks need to get past their current ceiling: rim protection, secondary ball handler who can create, only Brunson right now.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Alpha1971
Posts: 23153
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/17/2022
Member: #9006
3/10/2025  1:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/10/2025  1:14 PM
Time for Bridges to show what he is made of this stretch without Brunson.
VDesai
Posts: 41626
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
3/10/2025  1:32 PM
No way I'm staying up tonight especially after staying up for the last 2. The Kings are now just the Bulls West - slightly upgraded version as Sabonis better than Vooch.

I've always been LaVine curious, but at his salary/injury history it didn't make sense. He's had a good run of health lately and is playing well. Games missed the last couple of years made it untenable IMO.
VDesai
Posts: 41626
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
3/10/2025  1:43 PM
Woops posted before I realized Sabonis is out and Monk is likely out. They still have a lot of shooting and size with Jonas.

I have to say, this is one of those benchmark games for the team without Jalen. Its winnable talent wise, but we need to put together a real game offensively. Shooting vs. the Clippers was an abomination and they couldn't generate shots when needed. As much as we want Mikal to step up, the onus is really on KAT primarly - 24/25 ppg guy, all star starter/multi time all star. Gotta bring it.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/10/2025  1:49 PM
martin wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

There was nothing dirt cheap about Lavine. He's averaging well over $40M a year for the next two years following this one. You need defenders around KAT and Brunson. Even at their worst, OG and Brikal are way better defensively than Lavine.

i meant in terms of trade cost, CHI basically got ONE 1st for him.

all of these guys are expensive in terms of $ now.

I think we have enough good individual defenders. just need to defend better as a team.

IMO Knicks have elite wing defenders. They have caca for rim protectors outside of Mitch. Big time weakness until both Mitch and Huk and whomever are in the rotation.

I think we fans sometimes conflate what OG and Mikal are doing for lack of the back line protection that KAT is obviously not able to even pretend to do. Those guys can't do both and be counted on for offense. That trifecta is too much.

2 things Knicks need to get past their current ceiling: rim protection, secondary ball handler who can create, only Brunson right now.

Given where I am with this team, I would have traded (if I could have)Bridges for LaVine. He may be injured, but he is a guy that is willing to score.
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  5:44 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  5:49 PM
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
nycericanguy wrote:Man I always felt Lavine should have been a target here. SAC got him dirt cheap. He's like DDV on steroids. You can make the case we'd be better with Lavine and either of OG or Mikal instead of both. He just brings more dynamic offense and more volume on 3's which is something we are missing with DDV gone.

There was nothing dirt cheap about Lavine. He's averaging well over $40M a year for the next two years following this one. You need defenders around KAT and Brunson. Even at their worst, OG and Brikal are way better defensively than Lavine.

i meant in terms of trade cost, CHI basically got ONE 1st for him.

all of these guys are expensive in terms of $ now.

I think we have enough good individual defenders. just need to defend better as a team.

IMO Knicks have elite wing defenders. They have caca for rim protectors outside of Mitch. Big time weakness until both Mitch and Huk and whomever are in the rotation.

I think we fans sometimes conflate what OG and Mikal are doing for lack of the back line protection that KAT is obviously not able to even pretend to do. Those guys can't do both and be counted on for offense. That trifecta is too much.

2 things Knicks need to get past their current ceiling: rim protection, secondary ball handler who can create, only Brunson right now.

Given where I am with this team, I would have traded (if I could have)Bridges for LaVine. He may be injured, but he is a guy that is willing to score.

You can't have just 1 defender in your lineup, it just doesn't work. Fit has to count for something: Zach, KAT, Jalen is impossible

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
ToddTT
Posts: 29904
Alba Posts: 53
Joined: 8/30/2001
Member: #105
3/10/2025  8:11 PM
10:30 PM

Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  8:20 PM
ToddTT wrote:10:30 PM

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 74854
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/10/2025  8:28 PM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Clean
Posts: 30226
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
3/10/2025  9:05 PM
ToddTT
Posts: 29904
Alba Posts: 53
Joined: 8/30/2001
Member: #105
3/10/2025  9:22 PM
Clean wrote:

No more Precious threes.

Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
Rookie
Posts: 26885
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
3/10/2025  9:24 PM
Clean wrote:

The schedule got a lot harder after the Allstar. This has been the most boring Knicks team that I can remember
Page 1 of 5  1  2  3 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
GameThread: Another late night, Knicks @ Kings 10:30PM
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy