[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do we really want to see Towns moved to PF?


Author Poll
GustavBahler
Posts: 21663
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

KAT/OG frontcourt is starting to look good. Im also wondering if Thibs wants to keep KAT at the 5.
Yes
No
View Results


Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53376
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/31/2024  1:50 PM
blkexec wrote:The term Power Forward will be obsolete soon just like Point Guard, Shooting Guard and Centers. That’s what basketball used to be but not where it’s going.

Towns and our wing stop forwards, even JB, Deuce and Hart (for example). These guys are positionless players. And that’s the future of basketball. Some may argue it’s now the current structure of today’s basketball game. Yesterday PGs are today’s SGs (for example). iHart or Towns were centers yesterday, today they are point forwards or point centers making back door passes. Town really does everything.

So Towns was brought in to cause mis-matches and to add flexibility to an already flexible roster where we now have ALL 5 positions, especially on the starting lineup, can play multiple positions. Randle and Mitch for example play 1 position. Them two together reduced our flexibility. Towns and others on the roster can play 2-4 positions.

Perfect roster build to match up with any NBA team. Against the cavs, Mitch and Towns might be a better strategy against them. Other teams like Boston, we need towns at the 5 for example. So Thibs has a lot of flexibility on hand. Will be interesting to see how he utilizes this flexibility.

yeah... its bigger wing and smaller wing. The league has like 3 positions. PG, C and wing. You are one of those 3. You can play 2 PGs. You can play 2 Cs. But that's really it.

KAT is not a wing. Every time he's gotta guard one anywhere but the paint we are losing that matchup. Dude should NOT be burning calories out there. Look at him vs. Bam. You really need more evidence?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 70034
Alba Posts: 154
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/31/2024  1:57 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/31/2024  1:57 PM
NYKBocker wrote:I think KAT with Mitch will be great. If Mitch can work with Randle then KAT and Mitch would be really good. KAT will get his time a the 5 spot when Mitch is on the bench.

Randle and KAT have very different games. Can you elaborate how it would work?

Clean
Posts: 29684
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
10/31/2024  3:14 PM
I am not a fan of Towns as a 4. If you watch how deep he is in drop at center. You would have 2 bigs falling into deep drop and giving up open shots everywhere.
Clean
Posts: 29684
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
10/31/2024  3:16 PM
Looking at the Poll I don't even think OG is playing PF. He guards the bigger player because he is stronger but he is playing the SF role. Hart is playing the PF role.
blkexec
Posts: 27937
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/31/2024  4:00 PM
fishmike wrote:
blkexec wrote:The term Power Forward will be obsolete soon just like Point Guard, Shooting Guard and Centers. That’s what basketball used to be but not where it’s going.

Towns and our wing stop forwards, even JB, Deuce and Hart (for example). These guys are positionless players. And that’s the future of basketball. Some may argue it’s now the current structure of today’s basketball game. Yesterday PGs are today’s SGs (for example). iHart or Towns were centers yesterday, today they are point forwards or point centers making back door passes. Town really does everything.

So Towns was brought in to cause mis-matches and to add flexibility to an already flexible roster where we now have ALL 5 positions, especially on the starting lineup, can play multiple positions. Randle and Mitch for example play 1 position. Them two together reduced our flexibility. Towns and others on the roster can play 2-4 positions.

Perfect roster build to match up with any NBA team. Against the cavs, Mitch and Towns might be a better strategy against them. Other teams like Boston, we need towns at the 5 for example. So Thibs has a lot of flexibility on hand. Will be interesting to see how he utilizes this flexibility.

yeah... its bigger wing and smaller wing. The league has like 3 positions. PG, C and wing. You are one of those 3. You can play 2 PGs. You can play 2 Cs. But that's really it.

KAT is not a wing. Every time he's gotta guard one anywhere but the paint we are losing that matchup. Dude should NOT be burning calories out there. Look at him vs. Bam. You really need more evidence?

I think the term PG and Center is old. It’s just guards and forwards. Wings is the new term for forwards. Power Forwards are now TEs in football.

Kat is a big with multiple skills playing multiple positions. Kat at the 4 will be needed at some point. But not as a starting unit. I think this 5 is permanent. But during the game, Thibs will experiment with Mitch and Towns together.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
martin
Posts: 72382
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/31/2024  5:31 PM
VDesai wrote:Anyone who is asking for this doesn't understand why we made the trade.

There may be situations where he plays the 4 next to Mitch IF we keep Mitch. However its more likely you see Precious out there playing quasi 4-5 next to Towns and you wouldn't notice the size gap we currently have. I think Precious is a 18-20mpg player on this team.

+1

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
VDesai
Posts: 38836
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/1/2024  10:19 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/1/2024  10:19 AM
For those don't understand why you want KAT at the 5, watch this video and understand how the pick and pop potential completely neutralized BAM's drop coverage

martin
Posts: 72382
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/1/2024  10:37 AM
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 33898
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/1/2024  12:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/1/2024  12:40 PM
We need a backup PF/C that can rebound, we need a PF in a SG/SF's body that can rebound to come off the bench, Josh Harts role has to basically become Dennis Rodman's

I think we need to add some gritty sand paper to the tool box, not necessarily get new tools

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
fishmike
Posts: 53376
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/1/2024  2:15 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:We need a backup PF/C that can rebound, we need a PF in a SG/SF's body that can rebound to come off the bench, Josh Harts role has to basically become Dennis Rodman's

I think we need to add some gritty sand paper to the tool box, not necessarily get new tools

I think when the roster is healthy we have that. Brunson/Bridges/Hart/OG/KAT and McBride/Precious/Mitch feels like the 8 man playoff rotation Thibs will want to run. Only missing piece is a real backup PG but I am not sure Kolek is ready and I hate Payne
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BigDaddyG
Posts: 38728
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/1/2024  2:51 PM
VDesai wrote:For those don't understand why you want KAT at the 5, watch this video and understand how the pick and pop potential completely neutralized BAM's drop coverage

Counterpoint: Towns is just bad matchup for Bam. Towns at the 4 still creates mismatches if Mitch is in the game. Who's going guard him? Jaime or Jovic? Probably Bam. Plus you have Mitch to harass Bam on the other end. Of course, the real answer is that it depends on the matchup

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Clean
Posts: 29684
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
11/1/2024  3:33 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:For those don't understand why you want KAT at the 5, watch this video and understand how the pick and pop potential completely neutralized BAM's drop coverage

Counterpoint: Towns is just bad matchup for Bam. Towns at the 4 still creates mismatches if Mitch is in the game. Who's going guard him? Jaime or Jovic? Probably Bam. Plus you have Mitch to harass Bam on the other end. Of course, the real answer is that it depends on the matchup

Towns at the 4 on D is a mismatch for a lot of teams. We don't have the defensive player of the year to cover for him guarding faster players.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 38728
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/1/2024  4:24 PM
Clean wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:For those don't understand why you want KAT at the 5, watch this video and understand how the pick and pop potential completely neutralized BAM's drop coverage

Counterpoint: Towns is just bad matchup for Bam. Towns at the 4 still creates mismatches if Mitch is in the game. Who's going guard him? Jaime or Jovic? Probably Bam. Plus you have Mitch to harass Bam on the other end. Of course, the real answer is that it depends on the matchup

Towns at the 4 on D is a mismatch for a lot of teams. We don't have the defensive player of the year to cover for him guarding faster players.


Mitch is still very good and did it for RJ and Randle for a good number years. Again, it depends on the matchup. Karl is averaging half a block a game to date. I've heard all sorts of excuses for why his blocks are trending down, but it doesn't matter at this point. It's become a thing.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27027
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
11/1/2024  4:32 PM
Don’t really agree with the logic on swapping Robinson in at Center. It’s a different look, for sure, but you already have an advantage against about 94% of the league with KAT at the 5. Why give that up?

I’m a huge Mitch fan and can see them sharing the floor to create mismatches, but I don’t think that’s in your starting lineup where you are trying to get floor spacing for Brunson.

“Speak softly and carry a big stick” - KAT
martin
Posts: 72382
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/1/2024  5:08 PM
Missed this earlier

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 38728
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/1/2024  5:25 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:Don’t really agree with the logic on swapping Robinson in at Center. It’s a different look, for sure, but you already have an advantage against about 94% of the league with KAT at the 5. Why give that up?

I’m a huge Mitch fan and can see them sharing the floor to create mismatches, but I don’t think that’s in your starting lineup where you are trying to get floor spacing for Brunson.


I mean, the advantage doesn't real change much at the 4 tho? KAT is a walking mismatch. What the would do is bring in a lineup with the four best players in it, shore up the defensive interior and send Josh back to the bench, which to be honest, needs him. Now should they start off with a Mitch/KAT frontcourt? How long should they go with? Those are questions I don't have the answer to and we'll never know until Mitch comes back.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Nalod
Posts: 70034
Alba Posts: 154
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/1/2024  7:42 PM
You play with what you got. If Mitch is still here, you try things vs. some teams.
if we go against Cleveland in playoffs you might counter with a bigger line up.
KAT is best big shooting the 3. they have to deal with that.
martin
Posts: 72382
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/1/2024  7:44 PM
Lebron is going to be 40 in a few weeks and will make $50+m next year and he should still opt out and play for Knicks 😅😉

He’d be so perfect in the starting lineup

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Philc1
Posts: 27172
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

11/1/2024  8:58 PM
He can play both positions and both work. That’s why trading for him was an absolute no-brainer
BigDaddyG
Posts: 38728
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/1/2024  11:11 PM
martin wrote:Lebron is going to be 40 in a few weeks and will make $50+m next year and he should still opt out and play for Knicks 😅😉

He’d be so perfect in the starting lineup

Maybe Deuce can mentor Bronny the way he has iHuk.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Do we really want to see Towns moved to PF?

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy