[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Our pace of play next season?
Author Thread
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30101
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
8/11/2024  3:12 PM
Last season we held a 95.2 Pace which ranked 30th in the league. Which in the Knicks case was based on philosophy and roster construction.

With the lack of size and depth of bigmen going into the season, but a plethora of quality wings. Does the philosophy change to a more uptempo style? Outside of Mitch we aren't going to have strong rim protection. But will have the horses on the perimeter for spacing and pace.

Precious & Randle probably seeing backup C mins. This also leads to wanting to push the ball more and use more pace to take advantage of the quickness they hold for the position.

There will be the Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineups that will have to focus on length, athleticism, swarming and high pace.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
AUTOADVERT
Rookie
Posts: 26965
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

8/11/2024  5:54 PM
Is there a stat for what our pace was in the playoffs?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30101
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
8/12/2024  8:57 AM
Rookie wrote:Is there a stat for what our pace was in the playoffs?

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-playoffs-team-pace-rankings-2024

12th out of 16. 91.88

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
DLeethal
Posts: 22890
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

8/12/2024  10:23 AM
Maybe we aren't last but I expect us to be bottom 10 in pace again. Which is fine, Brunson plays a methodical half court game and so does Randle.
Nalod
Posts: 71048
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/12/2024  12:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/12/2024  12:37 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
Rookie wrote:Is there a stat for what our pace was in the playoffs?

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-playoffs-team-pace-rankings-2024

12th out of 16. 91.88

Celtics were 11th.
At times very iso-centric style of play.
They were on pace to win a chip!!

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30101
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
8/12/2024  1:00 PM
Nalod wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
Rookie wrote:Is there a stat for what our pace was in the playoffs?

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/nba-playoffs-team-pace-rankings-2024

12th out of 16. 91.88

Celtics were 11th.
At times very iso-centric style of play.
They were on pace to win a chip!!

Pace of play doesn't mean bad or good.

Starting lineup which will see majority of the mins together will most likely maintain a slower pace playing elite defense & controlling the boards. 2-man game with Brunson & Randle, everyone else will eat off that gravity.

All the rotations if Mitch isn't in are built more for faster pace though. Wonder if that's how Thibs finesses it?

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42667
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

8/13/2024  9:07 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/13/2024  9:08 PM
We were ranked 11th in fast break pts last season, a couple of spots above Boston. Raptors were number 1.

https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/stat/fastbreak-points-per-game

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/13/2024  9:30 PM
Pace is one of those stats that is not that informative by itself. It’s basically just minutes adjusted possessions per game. If you combine the Knicks offensive rebounds (not a new possession, extends shot clock) and defensive prowess (pushing opposing shot clock closer to 24), you get a low pace. But there are a ton of other factors that would increase pace. I doubt Pace has any direct effect on Win Loss.

Points Per Possession on the other hand…

You know I gonna spin wit it
martin
Posts: 75978
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/14/2024  9:44 AM
EwingsGlass wrote:Pace is one of those stats that is not that informative by itself. It’s basically just minutes adjusted possessions per game. If you combine the Knicks offensive rebounds (not a new possession, extends shot clock) and defensive prowess (pushing opposing shot clock closer to 24), you get a low pace. But there are a ton of other factors that would increase pace. I doubt Pace has any direct effect on Win Loss.

Points Per Possession on the other hand…

Right, plus the Knicks are a team that leans heavily on the Net rating stat to gauge performance.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
gradyandrew
Posts: 22402
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

8/14/2024  9:51 AM
Knicks have finished 30, 29, 25, and 30 in pace since Thibs took over. I'm guessing the Knicks will stay in that range. I'm interested in how offensive rebounds count as well. Do they count as a continuation of the possession or a new one?
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/14/2024  9:55 AM
gradyandrew wrote:Knicks have finished 30, 29, 25, and 30 in pace since Thibs took over. I'm guessing the Knicks will stay in that range. I'm interested in how offensive rebounds count as well. Do they count as a continuation of the possession or a new one?

Continuation of same possession. New possession requires change of control.

You know I gonna spin wit it
gradyandrew
Posts: 22402
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

8/14/2024  10:40 AM
EwingsGlass wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:Knicks have finished 30, 29, 25, and 30 in pace since Thibs took over. I'm guessing the Knicks will stay in that range. I'm interested in how offensive rebounds count as well. Do they count as a continuation of the possession or a new one?

Continuation of same possession. New possession requires change of control.

So, leading the league in offensive rebounds has a pretty strong effect on Pace. I don't think this is a stat we really need to pay attention to.

gradyandrew
Posts: 22402
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

8/14/2024  10:45 AM
gradyandrew wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:Knicks have finished 30, 29, 25, and 30 in pace since Thibs took over. I'm guessing the Knicks will stay in that range. I'm interested in how offensive rebounds count as well. Do they count as a continuation of the possession or a new one?

Continuation of same possession. New possession requires change of control.

So, leading the league in offensive rebounds has a pretty strong effect on Pace. I don't think this is a stat we really need to pay attention to.

7 of 10 teams at the bottom of Pace have a positive net rating vs. 5 of 10 at the top.

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30101
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
8/14/2024  12:22 PM
Almost every comment is about us being ranked 30th in the league in pace which clearly isn't the point of the post. We won 50 games last yr and was one game away from the ECC while dealing with some heavy injuries.

The thread and question is more about, due to basically swapping IHart with Mikal. Does Thibs look to emphasize his wings more with Mikal, OG, Hart, DDV while playing smaller at the C position. Thus also looking to operate at a faster pace?

Or does the pace remain the same even with the smaller lineups he will probably look to send out?

As mentioned earlier. I can see a Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineup used more for trapping, intercepting passing lanes, forcing TOs for fast breaks.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/14/2024  12:23 PM
gradyandrew wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:
gradyandrew wrote:Knicks have finished 30, 29, 25, and 30 in pace since Thibs took over. I'm guessing the Knicks will stay in that range. I'm interested in how offensive rebounds count as well. Do they count as a continuation of the possession or a new one?

Continuation of same possession. New possession requires change of control.

So, leading the league in offensive rebounds has a pretty strong effect on Pace. I don't think this is a stat we really need to pay attention to.

7 of 10 teams at the bottom of Pace have a positive net rating vs. 5 of 10 at the top.

Exactly. Leading the league in turnovers and leading the league in steals would have a similar increase on pace. Giving up fast break points increases pace in a similar manner to scoring on fast breaks. Its not actually correlated with game outcome events. High offensive rebounding percentage and low defensive rebounding percentage have similar effects on pace. Until you roll it back to points per possession (and as Martin and you say, Net Rating) it really doesn't tell you much.

You know I gonna spin wit it
martin
Posts: 75978
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/14/2024  3:36 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Almost every comment is about us being ranked 30th in the league in pace which clearly isn't the point of the post. We won 50 games last yr and was one game away from the ECC while dealing with some heavy injuries.

The thread and question is more about, due to basically swapping IHart with Mikal. Does Thibs look to emphasize his wings more with Mikal, OG, Hart, DDV while playing smaller at the C position. Thus also looking to operate at a faster pace?

Or does the pace remain the same even with the smaller lineups he will probably look to send out?

As mentioned earlier. I can see a Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineup used more for trapping, intercepting passing lanes, forcing TOs for fast breaks.

Great questions.

Boils down to: Does more wing players - probably more Mikal, Precious, Deuce and less iHart/C - mean a different style of play ie. less rebounding?

And would the more wings over bigs affect pace? Or whatever the change would be for the roster composition

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
ToddTT
Posts: 30421
Alba Posts: 53
Joined: 8/30/2001
Member: #105
8/14/2024  4:19 PM
martin wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Almost every comment is about us being ranked 30th in the league in pace which clearly isn't the point of the post. We won 50 games last yr and was one game away from the ECC while dealing with some heavy injuries.

The thread and question is more about, due to basically swapping IHart with Mikal. Does Thibs look to emphasize his wings more with Mikal, OG, Hart, DDV while playing smaller at the C position. Thus also looking to operate at a faster pace?

Or does the pace remain the same even with the smaller lineups he will probably look to send out?

As mentioned earlier. I can see a Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineup used more for trapping, intercepting passing lanes, forcing TOs for fast breaks.

Great questions.

Boils down to: Does more wing players - probably more Mikal, Precious, Deuce and less iHart/C - mean a different style of play ie. less rebounding?

And would the more wings over bigs affect pace? Or whatever the change would be for the roster composition

Yes... there's currently a 0% chance we'll have rebounding numbers like last year.

But that **** costs 90 million clams.

Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
GustavBahler
Posts: 42667
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

8/14/2024  7:13 PM
DLeethal wrote:Maybe we aren't last but I expect us to be bottom 10 in pace again. Which is fine, Brunson plays a methodical half court game and so does Randle.

I wouldn't be surprised if we played at a faster pace next season because this roster is so stacked. We lost a lot of players to injuries last season, including Randle. Brunson did an admirable job of almost singlehandedly propping up the offense at times, but it doesn't look like he has to do that next season.

Randle has shown he can play uptempo. Before Brunson arrived, he was often grabbing a rebound, and leading a fastbreak, playing point forward.

Im guessing that Brunson's assist numbers are going to go up next season, because he has so much talent around him now. Doesn't have to work as hard to keep them in the game.

The new and improved second unit could play at a faster pace as well.

martin
Posts: 75978
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/14/2024  8:08 PM
ToddTT wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Almost every comment is about us being ranked 30th in the league in pace which clearly isn't the point of the post. We won 50 games last yr and was one game away from the ECC while dealing with some heavy injuries.

The thread and question is more about, due to basically swapping IHart with Mikal. Does Thibs look to emphasize his wings more with Mikal, OG, Hart, DDV while playing smaller at the C position. Thus also looking to operate at a faster pace?

Or does the pace remain the same even with the smaller lineups he will probably look to send out?

As mentioned earlier. I can see a Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineup used more for trapping, intercepting passing lanes, forcing TOs for fast breaks.

Great questions.

Boils down to: Does more wing players - probably more Mikal, Precious, Deuce and less iHart/C - mean a different style of play ie. less rebounding?

And would the more wings over bigs affect pace? Or whatever the change would be for the roster composition

Yes... there's currently a 0% chance we'll have rebounding numbers like last year.

But that **** costs 90 million clams.

What if you are more of a mussels kind of guy?

Butter and garlic. Like lemon. White wine, some baguette? Meet Travolta and the boys for some salsa dancing after?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/14/2024  8:14 PM
ToddTT wrote:
martin wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:Almost every comment is about us being ranked 30th in the league in pace which clearly isn't the point of the post. We won 50 games last yr and was one game away from the ECC while dealing with some heavy injuries.

The thread and question is more about, due to basically swapping IHart with Mikal. Does Thibs look to emphasize his wings more with Mikal, OG, Hart, DDV while playing smaller at the C position. Thus also looking to operate at a faster pace?

Or does the pace remain the same even with the smaller lineups he will probably look to send out?

As mentioned earlier. I can see a Brunson, Hart, Mikal, OG, Precious lineup used more for trapping, intercepting passing lanes, forcing TOs for fast breaks.

Great questions.

Boils down to: Does more wing players - probably more Mikal, Precious, Deuce and less iHart/C - mean a different style of play ie. less rebounding?

And would the more wings over bigs affect pace? Or whatever the change would be for the roster composition

Yes... there's currently a 0% chance we'll have rebounding numbers like last year.

But that **** costs 90 million clams.

I mean. I think you are wrong. If you just look at Achiuwa’s per 36 to iHart’s per 36, they are very similar 10 and 10 to 11 and 11.

I think we will be fine. Especially if Robinson is healthy.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Our pace of play next season?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy