Nalod wrote:H20 had an incredible fundamental foot work and the ability to create space off the dribble. He was silky smooth and graceful
Grimes has fast feet and quick delivery.
Other than some physical similarities I don’t see the similarities. My take with IQ on the second units is they still want him to create which is not his strong suit quite yet. WIth the staring unit he gets put into better shooting positions. From that aspect playing with the first unit makes sense. Thus, he finishes strong with that unit. But, the goal is to get Grimes to improve. both IQ and certainly grimes are not finished players yet. IQ is closer.
Our second unit is a potent weapon. It appears we are keeping that.
Grimes ability to guard either wing player is important and he defends bigger than IQ.
I agree, Let them continue to grow.
DDV is here in the event a trade evolves with IQ perhaps.
I would add that Grimes and Houston share a reluctance to put the ball in play. Mostly spot up shooters. Grimes D was better, and of course Houston's offense was superior.
They also share what I believe to be a similar situation. They both were made starting SG when a better option was on the roster. In Houston's case Sprewell. Instead, Spree was made to play the 3, having to guard bigger players.
I would agree with you that IQ needed more seasoning, if we didnt see him avg 20pts plus a game as a starting PG and SG. If IQ needs anything IMO its more seasoning as a starter and closer.
I agree that IQ is in the second unit to punch it up, so to speak. But Grimes has been making a case that the starting SG spot needs another look.
Also correct that IQ looks like a likely candidate to be moved. Maybe for some frontcourt help. I'm skeptical that it will put us over the top, if Grimes still has no confidence in his ability to use his dribble.