[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would you: young Barrett for dame?


Author Poll
Caseloads
Posts: 7725
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
Barrett + EF + picks for Dame?
Yes - I want old dame
No - keep jung RJ
View Results


Author Thread
foosballnick
Posts: 21529
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

4/11/2023  7:15 AM
The Blazers are screwed if they can't find a trade partner for Dame. When he's 35 and 36 in a couple years they'll still be on the hook for paying him $58M then $63M in the final 2 years of his deal.
AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
4/11/2023  7:51 AM
I’d rather trade RJ for a player who fits better.
martin
Posts: 75991
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/11/2023  8:02 AM
Knixkik wrote:I’d rather trade RJ for a player who fits better.

This

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
VDesai
Posts: 42524
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
4/11/2023  8:18 AM
We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

joec32033
Posts: 30606
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/11/2023  9:06 AM
VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

2 guys I am trading RJ for

Jaylen Brown
Brandon Ingram

The guys you mentioned should be gettable with a guy like Obi.

I know the cliche line of "we need a team of Josh Hart's, instead of selfish players like RJ and Julius" sounds great and honorable, but you need talent, top end talent (RJ is a top end talent) and players like that to win. The Knicks are not good enough to trade for fit yet. Cam Johnson and Trey Murphy are NOT getting you closer to a title, no matter the fit.

This is not a starphuck (I hate the ****ing term...thanks Nalod) post, but a maximize your assets post. The RJ hate gets in the way of valuing him when talking trade.

~You can't run from who you are.~
fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/11/2023  9:20 AM
martin wrote:
Knixkik wrote:I’d rather trade RJ for a player who fits better.

This

x3... I would be fine with bringing in an older guy, especially a good finisher like Dame, but he's a PG and its 100% our strongest position with Brunson/IQ

Im all for moving RJ and maybe Obi/McBride/picks (depending on player). Targets should be OG/Butler/Ingram IMO

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 42524
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
4/11/2023  9:26 AM
I dunno about that- the Knicks have scoring. They have 2 guys that are legit 24/25 ppg scorers and honestly 3 guys that are capable of going for 40+ on any given night if you count Quickley, who has established himself as a guy who can get his shot at multiple levels and times. Barrett can be a dominant scorer at times, but plays a slow ISO game that overlaps with Brunson and Randle. What i'm talking about is getting a guy with upside that is a better fit. Murphy/Johnson are already 14-15 ppg type scorers, but they have length, play defense and can space the floor with their shooting. They can put up similar points to Barrett and provide a better fit around your 2 key players. The Knicks are competitive with every major team in the league. They had a good record vs. all the big dogs except Milwaukee- who they played close multiple times only to lose in the last cpl mins. Maybe it won't happen with Johnson who seems locked in a role player, but Murphy will be come a 20+ PPG scorer in the league next year at his current rate of improvement, and he showed off his full game vs. just a few nights ago.

Their biggest issue is execution down the stretch when their ISO players are keyed on - they don't have great spacing or shooters to stop the doubles/lane clogging. They also need consistent defenders around Randle and Brunson that can change the game.

Nalod
Posts: 71065
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/11/2023  10:27 AM
Go big or go home Starphuck…..(your welcome Joe),

Randle
IQ
Dallas pick, another first protected.
For Luka.
Two first rounders, allstar, high tier young player. Cube wants more. Hang up.

I have Brunson, I don’t need IQ. I love IQ BTW. Im starphuching and its expensive.
Naturally if one believes RJ is who he is then thats another story.
Look at Jeremi Grants stats. He blossomed with Detroit. Played 63 games this year on another **** team.
Igraham? Look at his games missed also.
Sure these guys are talented.
Key to NBA success? Employing Players who get better, not just paying for past success.

Obi
Luka
Mitch
JoshHart
Brunson

Is this a chip starting 5? Wheres RJ? Im not sure what to do here. Bring him off the bench?
Does not mean it lasts forever. He gets that shot back he can slot in at PF to finish.
You go with the lineup that wins.

Back to point? Dames contract, age, and redundancy means you likely entertain trading Brunson and perhaps lock up IQ for long term Dame replacement and insurance. His contract is a mutha****er. How many teams can take on Dame and still be good afterwards?
ATL with Trae as centerpiece?
Orlando or DC for young role players and picks? Portland likely does not want Beal. A trio of KP, Dame and Beal is intriguing.
They go all in. Way in.
Rockets get Webenyama they can do a lot of things with their picks and yoot.

joec32033
Posts: 30606
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
4/11/2023  10:34 AM
VDesai wrote:I dunno about that- the Knicks have scoring. They have 2 guys that are legit 24/25 ppg scorers and honestly 3 guys that are capable of going for 40+ on any given night if you count Quickley, who has established himself as a guy who can get his shot at multiple levels and times. Barrett can be a dominant scorer at times, but plays a slow ISO game that overlaps with Brunson and Randle. What i'm talking about is getting a guy with upside that is a better fit. Murphy/Johnson are already 14-15 ppg type scorers, but they have length, play defense and can space the floor with their shooting. They can put up similar points to Barrett and provide a better fit around your 2 key players. The Knicks are competitive with every major team in the league. They had a good record vs. all the big dogs except Milwaukee- who they played close multiple times only to lose in the last cpl mins. Maybe it won't happen with Johnson who seems locked in a role player, but Murphy will be come a 20+ PPG scorer in the league next year at his current rate of improvement, and he showed off his full game vs. just a few nights ago.

Their biggest issue is execution down the stretch when their ISO players are keyed on - they don't have great spacing or shooters to stop the doubles/lane clogging. They also need consistent defenders around Randle and Brunson that can change the game.

Reading some Pelicans message boards Murphy is their version of how Grimes is viewed here. He needs more shots because his percentages on low volume are high.
Cam Johnson hasn't played more than 70 games in a season in his career, which started in 2019/20.

I'm fine with trading RJ if the deal is right (although I think they will regret it) but for a couple for a 3 and D guy it doesn't make sense.

~You can't run from who you are.~
GustavBahler
Posts: 42673
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

4/11/2023  10:40 AM
Much respect for Damian Lillard. As a player, entrepreneur, philanthropist, lyricist.

I dont like the idea of trading young for old. If RJ is traded, I'd hope the player we get back would be a starter for the next 3-4 years or so. Not sure how much longer Dame can play at this level. Not to mention defense at this stage in his career.

Kind of hoping Lillard plays his entire career in Portland.

Nalod
Posts: 71065
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/11/2023  10:46 AM
GustavBahler wrote:Much respect for Damian Lillard. As a player, entrepreneur, philanthropist, lyricist.

I dont like the idea of trading young for old. If RJ is traded, I'd hope the player we get back would be a starter for the next 3-4 years or so. Not sure how much longer Dame can play at this level. Not to mention defense at this stage in his career.

Kind of hoping Lillard plays his entire career in Portland.

And this contract is a beast………

Also, your not trading RJ for him straight up. You need RJ and EF contracts, plus picks and yoots.

Philc1
Posts: 28279
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

4/12/2023  3:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/12/2023  3:25 PM
An aging combo guard who doesn’t play D and is maybe a year away from being strictly catch and shoot guy with $48 million annual salary? Trade RJ for that? Is this like the Isiah Thomas school if GM’ing?
Philc1
Posts: 28279
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

4/12/2023  3:26 PM
joec32033 wrote:
VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

2 guys I am trading RJ for

Jaylen Brown
Brandon Ingram

The guys you mentioned should be gettable with a guy like Obi.

I know the cliche line of "we need a team of Josh Hart's, instead of selfish players like RJ and Julius" sounds great and honorable, but you need talent, top end talent (RJ is a top end talent) and players like that to win. The Knicks are not good enough to trade for fit yet. Cam Johnson and Trey Murphy are NOT getting you closer to a title, no matter the fit.

This is not a starphuck (I hate the ****ing term...thanks Nalod) post, but a maximize your assets post. The RJ hate gets in the way of valuing him when talking trade.

RJ plus picks for Brown yes.

fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/12/2023  4:26 PM
joec32033 wrote:
VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

2 guys I am trading RJ for

Jaylen Brown
Brandon Ingram

The guys you mentioned should be gettable with a guy like Obi.

I know the cliche line of "we need a team of Josh Hart's, instead of selfish players like RJ and Julius" sounds great and honorable, but you need talent, top end talent (RJ is a top end talent) and players like that to win. The Knicks are not good enough to trade for fit yet. Cam Johnson and Trey Murphy are NOT getting you closer to a title, no matter the fit.

This is not a starphuck (I hate the ****ing term...thanks Nalod) post, but a maximize your assets post. The RJ hate gets in the way of valuing him when talking trade.

problem with the bold is nobody in NBA circles believe that but a few Knick fans. If RJ believed it himself he wouldnt have resigned for what he did. He would have bet on himself getting a max contract. Instead he took a 2nd tier contract and is proving to be a 2nd tier player
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
LivingLegend
Posts: 25465
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

4/12/2023  5:22 PM
First off - I get that Lillard is a great scorer and has been a big time player BUT he does fit here with Brunson and has Dame ever made players around him better?

I mean Brunson walked in here an immediately lifted us up.

We have Brunson/IQ —- let’s find a legit..legit 2 or 3 that can play big time in big playoff games.

Only options may be LaVine and Beal — anybody else?

LivingLegend
Posts: 25465
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

4/12/2023  5:25 PM
Philc1 wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

2 guys I am trading RJ for

Jaylen Brown
Brandon Ingram

The guys you mentioned should be gettable with a guy like Obi.

I know the cliche line of "we need a team of Josh Hart's, instead of selfish players like RJ and Julius" sounds great and honorable, but you need talent, top end talent (RJ is a top end talent) and players like that to win. The Knicks are not good enough to trade for fit yet. Cam Johnson and Trey Murphy are NOT getting you closer to a title, no matter the fit.

This is not a starphuck (I hate the ****ing term...thanks Nalod) post, but a maximize your assets post. The RJ hate gets in the way of valuing him when talking trade.

RJ plus picks for Brown yes.

I don’t see Boston ever dealing with the Knicks on a player like Brown.

If they were I think we would have to start with IQ - who wants to do that?

LivingLegend
Posts: 25465
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

4/12/2023  5:27 PM
Ingram is an interesting thought but with Jones/Murphy Pelicans don’t really have a need for RJ.

Pelicans don’t have a PG do they? Again that would lead us back to IQ.

Someone above I think said they wouldn’t deal RJ for T Murphy. Really?

fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/12/2023  5:41 PM
LivingLegend wrote:Ingram is an interesting thought but with Jones/Murphy Pelicans don’t really have a need for RJ.

Pelicans don’t have a PG do they? Again that would lead us back to IQ.

Someone above I think said they wouldn’t deal RJ for T Murphy. Really?

Pels have a bunch of decent wings. I would think they would look HARD had a deal for Ingram for RJ/Obi/McBride. They have had big depth problems and Obi would also give them a nice prospect to look at when Zion misses a 1000 games. For us we upgrade the weakest link in the rotation with an all star caliber guy. He gets hurt alot but I think our depth could offset some on that.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27456
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
4/12/2023  6:20 PM
fishmike wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:Ingram is an interesting thought but with Jones/Murphy Pelicans don’t really have a need for RJ.

Pelicans don’t have a PG do they? Again that would lead us back to IQ.

Someone above I think said they wouldn’t deal RJ for T Murphy. Really?

Pels have a bunch of decent wings. I would think they would look HARD had a deal for Ingram for RJ/Obi/McBride. They have had big depth problems and Obi would also give them a nice prospect to look at when Zion misses a 1000 games. For us we upgrade the weakest link in the rotation with an all star caliber guy. He gets hurt alot but I think our depth could offset some on that.

I’d like to hold onto McBride, but you have to give to get. I’d be open to something like that. Ingram is only 25. Hasn’t really been able to stay healthy, but shows some real skill as a distributor. He’d make a pretty solid big 3 with Brunson and Randle, assuming those two can accept his role in the offense.

I’m still on the OG Anunoby kick, but Ingram is the higher end alternative if he were to become available.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Philc1
Posts: 28279
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

4/12/2023  6:39 PM
LivingLegend wrote:
Philc1 wrote:
joec32033 wrote:
VDesai wrote:We don't maximize our talent by trading RJ for another undersized combo guard to pair with Brunson. We need a lengthy SG/SF who can play defense and stretch the floor. Guys like Trey Murphy III and Cameron Johnson seem to be the best kind of fits.

Dame is a great, but will be in his mid 30s and hasn't played over 70 games in 5 yrs and leaves us weak defensively. And it will cost way more than RJ.

2 guys I am trading RJ for

Jaylen Brown
Brandon Ingram

The guys you mentioned should be gettable with a guy like Obi.

I know the cliche line of "we need a team of Josh Hart's, instead of selfish players like RJ and Julius" sounds great and honorable, but you need talent, top end talent (RJ is a top end talent) and players like that to win. The Knicks are not good enough to trade for fit yet. Cam Johnson and Trey Murphy are NOT getting you closer to a title, no matter the fit.

This is not a starphuck (I hate the ****ing term...thanks Nalod) post, but a maximize your assets post. The RJ hate gets in the way of valuing him when talking trade.

RJ plus picks for Brown yes.

I don’t see Boston ever dealing with the Knicks on a player like Brown.

If they were I think we would have to start with IQ - who wants to do that?

Agree I don’t see the Celtics trading Brown within the East.

Would you: young Barrett for dame?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy