blkexec wrote:Knixkik wrote:Knicks already account for this by always playing RJ with the second unit. The reason he doesn’t play well with Brunson, and does with Randle, is more about the fact that RJ doesn’t feel comfortable as a #3 option. If Randle missed time (he hasn’t so RJ has never played exclusively with Brunson) the result would be similar. RJ still has the mentality of a star, and most teams only have 2 high usage guys at once. RJ is not a spot up shooter or off-ball mover. He’s a guy who wants his touches and gets pinched playing with 2 playmakers. RJ needs to continue to adjust to the role a third option would play for any team. Best example is someone like Mikal Bridges. He’s what a third option is so supposed to look like on a contender. What he did in Phoenix even though he’s proving he can be more in Brooklyn. RJ just simply is more comfortable as a second option than third at this point in his career.
I hear you and agree with most, except the bold.
It's more than not wanting to be the 3rd option. RJ's game is better when he's on the ball. Same with Randle. Thats why I was skeptical of this big 3. We have 3 guys who all excel when the ball is in their hands. Brunson proved to be valuable without the ball, when he played in Dallas. But when Luka was out, he scored 40 plus in the playoffs. So clearly Brunson is a better scorer and impact player with the ball.
There's not enough balls to go around for RJ, when Brunson and Randle are on the floor. In the second unit, he's the first option. Will be interesting to see how the FO handles this. It's clear in Thibs mind, play RJ with second unit. I believe they did not know how impactful Brunson would be. But RJ's contract will kick in soon. IQ looking for a new contract, and so is Hart. The FO will get it's money worth, trying to handle all these new and existing contracts. Meanwhile Thib will continue to play his guys, regardless of their contract. Interesting dynamic. And it's something I've mentioned all season. Thibs and FO. RJ and the big 3.
Regardless, this team needs a focused RJ to make it past the 1st round. Or make the playoffs period.
Its a good take and its something they need to figure out. We vilify players individually but there is much about chemistry. The EF/Randle thing did not work. We keep talking about how RJ is this, or RJ not that, but with Brunson the ball is not feeding into RJ were it did last year and him thriving. Thibs admitted to having to coach Randle better, and he did. Many fans thought Randle had to be dumped.
My take is we are very iso centric. Brunson and Randle. They are excelling. RJ role seems to be different this year. more iso and his outside shot when cold leaves him less dimensional.
What is the fix? Trade him? LOL, well, thats one way. "More Grimes and IQ"...........
Well, IQ too is thriving on the Iso. He is better playmaking this season but to what degree?
"Trade for OG".........He is very Josh Hart like.
Whats logical? RJ either "gets fixed", blends in as he matures, or gets traded. Traded not because he sucks balls or bleeds my eyes, its going to return a better piece to accomplish.
Thats all that matters, not who is right or can predict.
The key is not RJ leaving, its who comes in to fill that spot. Predict that, and I am impressed.
Might be IQ stepping in to start? Send Grimes to the bench? That works also.