[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The baseline for the OG Anunoby Trade is the D Murray Trade


Author Poll
Knixkik
Posts: 15411
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
I know there’s another OG thread but I want to get a feel for if people would do a deal for OG that’s comparable to the Murray deal. That’s going to be the closest comp out there, which is 2 unprotected picks, a protected pick, an unprotected swap, and matching salary. For the Knicks I’ll say maybe Toppin replaces a swap. So Toppin, Reddish, Svi, 2 unprotected Knicks picks, and a protected pick from another team is my closest offer. Or Drose plus the 2 Unprotected, 1 protected and 1 swap. Either way, are you making the Murray deal for OG?
Yes to moving 2 unprotected picks, a swap (or Obi as replacement) and a protected pick
No deal, too much for a non-star
View Results


Author Thread
Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/31/2023  8:53 AM
I’d also add that I’m guessing the conversation right now is centered around 1 unprotected pick, plus the Dallas pick and another protected pick, which probably isn’t enough for Toronto even if Toppin is involved.
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 75993
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/31/2023  9:00 AM
I think working off of the DMurray baseline a good idea.

Knixkik, do you think DMurray was more valuable to someone like OG or equal or lesser value?

I'd argue DMurray had greater value but interested to hear others.

Both have same defensive upside and DMurray has better ball handling and breakdown ability. I think Murray better scorer. Murray has played more games per year although sat with ACL for a season.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/31/2023  9:13 AM
martin wrote:I think working off of the DMurray baseline a good idea.

Knixkik, do you think DMurray was more valuable to someone like OG or equal or lesser value?

I'd argue DMurray had greater value but interested to hear others.

Both have same defensive upside and DMurray has better ball handling and breakdown ability. I think Murray better scorer. Murray has played more games per year although sat with ACL for a season.

It’s a great question. It’s really close. I’d argue Murray is a better player (and has an allstar game under his belt for whatever that’s worth) but OG is a more seamless fit across the board which increases his value to the level of murray or greater. Murray is a ball dominant player who wouldn’t make sense everywhere. His fit with Trae young has been questionable at best, so it would probably be the same case with about half the rest of the league or more. OG would have zero fit issues pretty much anywhere in the league. He can start at the 2,3 or 4. He can play on a team interested in seeing him in a bigger on-ball role or as simply a supercharged role player that he currently is. So I would honestly say I value OG slightly higher due to the versatility but I think the value on the trade market is virtually equal to Murray.

martin
Posts: 75993
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/31/2023  9:20 AM
Knixkik wrote:
martin wrote:I think working off of the DMurray baseline a good idea.

Knixkik, do you think DMurray was more valuable to someone like OG or equal or lesser value?

I'd argue DMurray had greater value but interested to hear others.

Both have same defensive upside and DMurray has better ball handling and breakdown ability. I think Murray better scorer. Murray has played more games per year although sat with ACL for a season.

It’s a great question. It’s really close. I’d argue Murray is a better player (and has an allstar game under his belt for whatever that’s worth) but OG is a more seamless fit across the board which increases his value to the level of murray or greater. Murray is a ball dominant player who wouldn’t make sense everywhere. His fit with Trae young has been questionable at best, so it would probably be the same case with about half the rest of the league or more. OG would have zero fit issues pretty much anywhere in the league. He can start at the 2,3 or 4. He can play on a team interested in seeing him in a bigger on-ball role or as simply a supercharged role player that he currently is. So I would honestly say I value OG slightly higher due to the versatility but I think the value on the trade market is virtually equal to Murray.

OK, I was just thinking about market value, cause that is what you pay.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
joec32033
Posts: 30606
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/31/2023  9:21 AM
He's a good player but too much. Especially for 25 year old who hasn't played 70 games in a season since his rookie year.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Nalod
Posts: 71067
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/31/2023  9:26 AM
The baseline is a good start. Exception is Raptors are in a vastly different situation that Toronto both with current roster, talent on that roster, and pending free agents. Spurs are uber young and tanking. Raptors are underachieving and have depth.
Murray was deemed not a good culture fit going forward and one that would command a good sized payday.
What SAS wanted back was different than what raptors want.
Is it picks or combo of players an picks?
Is it before deadline or in the summer?
If its rumor of two promising players and a pick, who are those players? How many roster spots can Toronto absorb if its mid season trade. EF, Reddish, Obi and two picks? Is Reddish promising? No, he a project.
Hate to say it again, IQ might be that guy with Obi. Or Grimes. Thats ok, we getting a wing back.
Tell me how thibs and FO think about RJ at the 2 long term?
Tell me what they are doing with Trent and Fred and we can start guessing?
Tell me how they feel about their crowded forward issue and lack of a 5?
Then does Sims or Hartenstein fit any slots there?
And again, does OG trade get them to playoffs?
Trades take two to make it happen or a third gets involved. We can offer picks, but are they looking to salvage this season as well?
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/31/2023  9:31 AM
I don't know about protected or unprotected picks - but if Toronto is looking to re-tool - I have to imagine us being able to give them 3 picks this year, potentially, in Dallas, ours and Washington- is a pretty strong offer.

We just need to beat out what other teams are able to offer.

martin
Posts: 75993
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/31/2023  9:32 AM
My guess: I think Knicks would want one of their 2023 picks (whether Dallas or their own).

There is a big difference between including DRose in trade and Obi.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39743
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/31/2023  9:35 AM
I think Jerami Grant is a closer baseline. A combo forward in his prime who can guard both forward spots and possibly some guards. OG is the better defender but Grant is superior offensively.
https://stathead.com/tiny/U4PEH

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/grantje01.html?__hstc=205977932.248820d850fac69327d1a7f38cd86746.1664288570729.1675092064929.1675175547316.21&__hssc=205977932.1.1675175547316&__hsfp=4132440087

July 6, 2022: Traded by the Detroit Pistons with Ismael Kamagate to the Portland Trail Blazers for Gabriele Procida, a 2025 1st round draft pick ( was later selected), a 2025 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected) and a 2026 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected). Detroit also received a trade exception conditional 2025 1st-rd pick is MIL own 2025 2nd-rd pick is DET own 2026 2nd-rd pick is more favorable
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 75993
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/31/2023  9:39 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:I think Jerami Grant is a closer baseline. A combo forward in his prime who can guard both forward spots and possibly some guards. OG is the better defender but Grant is superior offensively.
https://stathead.com/tiny/U4PEH

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/grantje01.html?__hstc=205977932.248820d850fac69327d1a7f38cd86746.1664288570729.1675092064929.1675175547316.21&__hssc=205977932.1.1675175547316&__hsfp=4132440087

July 6, 2022: Traded by the Detroit Pistons with Ismael Kamagate to the Portland Trail Blazers for Gabriele Procida, a 2025 1st round draft pick ( was later selected), a 2025 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected) and a 2026 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected). Detroit also received a trade exception conditional 2025 1st-rd pick is MIL own 2025 2nd-rd pick is DET own 2026 2nd-rd pick is more favorable

Oh, this is a good comparison. Shall we say, a pre-Gobert trade scenario. Ugh stupid Minny.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39743
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/31/2023  9:48 AM
martin wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:I think Jerami Grant is a closer baseline. A combo forward in his prime who can guard both forward spots and possibly some guards. OG is the better defender but Grant is superior offensively.
https://stathead.com/tiny/U4PEH

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/grantje01.html?__hstc=205977932.248820d850fac69327d1a7f38cd86746.1664288570729.1675092064929.1675175547316.21&__hssc=205977932.1.1675175547316&__hsfp=4132440087

July 6, 2022: Traded by the Detroit Pistons with Ismael Kamagate to the Portland Trail Blazers for Gabriele Procida, a 2025 1st round draft pick ( was later selected), a 2025 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected) and a 2026 2nd round draft pick ( was later selected). Detroit also received a trade exception conditional 2025 1st-rd pick is MIL own 2025 2nd-rd pick is DET own 2026 2nd-rd pick is more favorable

Oh, this is a good comparison. Shall we say, a pre-Gobert trade scenario. Ugh stupid Minny.


I should add that both are injury prone. Whether you bought Murray's numbers last year or not, he did produce at rate that arguably made him one the top 10 guards in the league last year.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Chandler
Posts: 26774
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

1/31/2023  9:59 AM
I agree Gran is the better comparison

I also think that every draft has a defensive specialist if that's what you're really after. It's a tough choice though because a lot of those guys seem to be in the same area where the Bookers and Klays get drafted. Point being, it's typically in the no-sure-thing area so a gamble in either direction O or D

Personally, i like the idea of adding a piece that is not ball dominant but i would not give up a lot for OG. I would also prefer we add shooting

(5)(7)
fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/31/2023  10:06 AM
absolutely NOT worth was D Murray cost... is OG an all star? A #1 or even #2 option? He's a role player and a complimentary piece and not the guy who puts you into the contention conversation IMO. Something like Obi/Cam and 2-3 of those protected picks.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 42524
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
1/31/2023  11:04 AM
Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34053
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/31/2023  11:17 AM
What am I missing here? I don’t see anything worthy of three firsts. I wouldn’t have paid three firsts for a choke free Spreewell. OG is closer to James Posey than Latrell Spreewell. Am I missing something?
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Nalod
Posts: 71067
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/31/2023  11:17 AM
VDesai wrote:Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.

Then its being patience and understanding that 22 year olds need time. Obviously its not our decision but guessing what goes into the thought process of a front office when deciding.
Also obvious is the difference of opinion from our same sample of fans.
True, Murray is an allstar and being paired with another in Trae. Murray personality was not "appreciated" by Pop and the Spurs FO. I thought that was a good deal for both teams on paper and we only a half season in so is it fair to letter grade it?
Same for DM to Cav's. For a while looked like Jazz flat out fleeced the Cavs. Then not. now Cavs are struggling a bit. Most fair analysis said its a two year window for Cavs BEFORE they have to consider resigning DM.
OG is a very good player. Raptors are bidding him up. Ujiri is doing his job.
But what does he want?

fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/31/2023  11:36 AM
Nalod wrote:
VDesai wrote:Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.

Then its being patience and understanding that 22 year olds need time. Obviously its not our decision but guessing what goes into the thought process of a front office when deciding.
Also obvious is the difference of opinion from our same sample of fans.
True, Murray is an allstar and being paired with another in Trae. Murray personality was not "appreciated" by Pop and the Spurs FO. I thought that was a good deal for both teams on paper and we only a half season in so is it fair to letter grade it?
Same for DM to Cav's. For a while looked like Jazz flat out fleeced the Cavs. Then not. now Cavs are struggling a bit. Most fair analysis said its a two year window for Cavs BEFORE they have to consider resigning DM.
OG is a very good player. Raptors are bidding him up. Ujiri is doing his job.
But what does he want?


our fans are retards. Who cares. What matter is the FO is patient, not the fans. Same fans crying for Randle to to be gone are the same one's chanting MVP these days.

What matters is good BB moves. OG is a nice pieces and a core rotation guy is worth a couple late firsts like we have.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39743
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/31/2023  11:39 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/31/2023  11:45 AM
Nalod wrote:
VDesai wrote:Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.

Then its being patience and understanding that 22 year olds need time. Obviously its not our decision but guessing what goes into the thought process of a front office when deciding.
Also obvious is the difference of opinion from our same sample of fans.
True, Murray is an allstar and being paired with another in Trae. Murray personality was not "appreciated" by Pop and the Spurs FO. I thought that was a good deal for both teams on paper and we only a half season in so is it fair to letter grade it?
Same for DM to Cav's. For a while looked like Jazz flat out fleeced the Cavs. Then not. now Cavs are struggling a bit. Most fair analysis said its a two year window for Cavs BEFORE they have to consider resigning DM.
OG is a very good player. Raptors are bidding him up. Ujiri is doing his job.
But what does he want?

Isn't obvious? He wants to Phuck us!


Seriously, he just wants everything he can get for OG and you can't blame. OG is a player a lot of teams could use. Saw something that said the Grizz are also in the running, which makes sense. The question is what makes sense for the Knicks. Personally, I could accept the Knicks or Dallas picks this year and the Detroit protected pick.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Nalod
Posts: 71067
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/31/2023  11:47 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Nalod wrote:
VDesai wrote:Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.

Then its being patience and understanding that 22 year olds need time. Obviously its not our decision but guessing what goes into the thought process of a front office when deciding.
Also obvious is the difference of opinion from our same sample of fans.
True, Murray is an allstar and being paired with another in Trae. Murray personality was not "appreciated" by Pop and the Spurs FO. I thought that was a good deal for both teams on paper and we only a half season in so is it fair to letter grade it?
Same for DM to Cav's. For a while looked like Jazz flat out fleeced the Cavs. Then not. now Cavs are struggling a bit. Most fair analysis said its a two year window for Cavs BEFORE they have to consider resigning DM.
OG is a very good player. Raptors are bidding him up. Ujiri is doing his job.
But what does he want?

Isn't obvious? He wants to Phuck us!


Seriously, he just wants everything he can get for OG and you can't blame. OG is a player a lot of teams could use. Saw something that said the Grizz are also in the running, which makes sense. The question is what makes sense for the Knicks. Personally, I could accept the Knicks and Dallas picks this year and the Detroit protected pick.

but......future picks are future "grimes an IQ" also. We draft new guys with picks. Can't tell you who.
If your Raptors, does that make sense?
Its not that

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39743
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/31/2023  11:52 AM
Nalod wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Nalod wrote:
VDesai wrote:Forget it. He's an upgrade to the Grimes spot in the rotation. Id rather bet on Grimes being 80% of OG than spending something likee Grimes + 2 first rounders.

Then its being patience and understanding that 22 year olds need time. Obviously its not our decision but guessing what goes into the thought process of a front office when deciding.
Also obvious is the difference of opinion from our same sample of fans.
True, Murray is an allstar and being paired with another in Trae. Murray personality was not "appreciated" by Pop and the Spurs FO. I thought that was a good deal for both teams on paper and we only a half season in so is it fair to letter grade it?
Same for DM to Cav's. For a while looked like Jazz flat out fleeced the Cavs. Then not. now Cavs are struggling a bit. Most fair analysis said its a two year window for Cavs BEFORE they have to consider resigning DM.
OG is a very good player. Raptors are bidding him up. Ujiri is doing his job.
But what does he want?

Isn't obvious? He wants to Phuck us!


Seriously, he just wants everything he can get for OG and you can't blame. OG is a player a lot of teams could use. Saw something that said the Grizz are also in the running, which makes sense. The question is what makes sense for the Knicks. Personally, I could accept the Knicks and Dallas picks this year and the Detroit protected pick.

but......future picks are future "grimes an IQ" also. We draft new guys with picks. Can't tell you who.
If your Raptors, does that make sense?
Its not that

I meant to say Knicks or Dallas picks. Not both. Like I said, he wants everything he can get. IQ would make the most sense in our case, given the FVV situation. We'd probably be pushing for Obi, who would redundant on the Raps roster. Cam? Just a throw in. I'm not sure if a compromise exists TBH.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
The baseline for the OG Anunoby Trade is the D Murray Trade

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy