Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Knixkik
Posts: 35411 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() I agree he seems like a better option if available, but doesn’t seem like he is.
|
Sambakick
Posts: 21477 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/8/2013 Member: #5646 |
![]() They're not trading him. Stop all the SGA talk.
Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
|
martin
Posts: 75997 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:technomaster wrote:TheGame wrote:SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team. Right. Thoughtful stuff, thanks. RJ gained a ton of weight from his waist down and it’s slowed him down even more IMO. I so badly wanna eat RJ crow from the crow buffet but I just don’t see it happening Knicks 3 “best” players in RJ Randle Brunson have sucked ass on defense this year. I do feel that the FO has to at least project that they’d like to build around an RJ type but think they move him in a heartbeat for the right return. Obviously same with Randle. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|