[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

SGA is a better trade target than Mitchell
Author Thread
GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/14/2022  3:54 PM
Knicks still have all those picks, talent to offer. The FO would be buying high. But I doubt its getting lower for SGA. If its lower than Mitchell's asking price, I hope the FO pounces.

Wont be cheap but maybe a deal leaves us competitive. The Mitchell asking price didnt.

AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/14/2022  5:11 PM
only the tabloids think he's available... he's not. He's their build around player. They have all the picks they need.

The only deal they would consider is if you won pick #1 and offered them that pick (Wemba) and you get back SGA.

SGA is the star they got lucky with. They have crazy top tier talent around him and in the pipeline. Their cache of picks ensures crazy flexibility moving forward.

Let this one go.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/14/2022  6:28 PM
And Mitchell wasnt available...until he was. Its all speculation until it happens.

Mitchell would have given us an undersized backcourt. Wouldnt be an issue with SGA.

Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
11/14/2022  8:01 PM
I agree he seems like a better option if available, but doesn’t seem like he is.
Sambakick
Posts: 21477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/8/2013
Member: #5646

11/14/2022  8:39 PM
They're not trading him. Stop all the SGA talk.
Everything in moderation. Even moderation.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42686
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/14/2022  8:55 PM
Sambakick wrote:They're not trading him. Stop all the SGA talk.

SGA might ask for a trade to a major market team. Most trade requests are honored these days. They would get a nice haul.

I agree its no sure thing. But my point remains that there are trade targets out there who are a better fit than DM. Our shot at relevance didnt end with him.

MS
Posts: 27059
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
11/14/2022  10:09 PM
RJ and 6 1st rounders gets it done. He has PER inside the top 10. He’s keeping them in games and relevant.

We missed the last window as usual.

If we offered the house before the season it was possible.

TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/14/2022  11:14 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/15/2022  4:10 AM
SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team.
Trust the Process
jskinny35
Posts: 21580
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
11/15/2022  2:03 AM
I like SGA and as much as I have been an RJ supporter - I'd trade him and picks for SGA due to his defensive potential.

I agree that having both RJ and SGA in the same lineup would magnify our limited outside shooting struggles.

I also suspect the team struggles would continue until Randle either adjusts his role (less ball handling) or is benched in an effort to help him adapt. While the talent and production is there - his current style of play would not help bring out the best in SGA and his abilities.

Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

11/15/2022  6:14 AM
MS wrote:RJ and 6 1st rounders gets it done. He has PER inside the top 10. He’s keeping them in games and relevant.

We missed the last window as usual.

If we offered the house before the season it was possible.

Yep, If we went hard after him last season we could have gotten him. No chance now. Would you trade him if your OKC? So, far this season he is one of the top 5 players in the league

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
technomaster
Posts: 23346
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
11/15/2022  12:18 PM
TheGame wrote:SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team.

I think the biggest difference is that SGA is an elite fast twitch athlete. RJ is merely above average. You see it in the way they move, the way SGA can make adjustments mid-move and look fluid, while RJ looks somewhat rehearsed and mechanical.

Then there's the playmaking skills. The way SGA sees the floor, handles the rock, and passes is PG-like. Of course, this is helped by the way he can use quickness to get a step on defenders. RJ doesn't have as quick a step or as explosive, so everything is harder.
Maybe those skills are hidden away in RJ too, but he's just not as elite an athlete. (Kind of the way Ray Allen was just better all-around than Allan Houston

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
nyvector16
Posts: 21322
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
11/15/2022  12:42 PM
MS wrote:RJ and 6 1st rounders gets it done. He has PER inside the top 10. He’s keeping them in games and relevant.

We missed the last window as usual.

If we offered the house before the season it was possible.

I would only do this if we get to keep our own pick in 2023.
With so much talent in this next draft and this current regime's track record on picks, we have a good chance of picking up several good players.

knicks 2023 picks:

  • 2023 - Own
  • WAS 15-30 (Will likely convey if current trends persist)
  • DAL 11-30 (projected high teens w/ current standings)
  • DET 19-30 (This will not convey in 2023)

The Knicks are primed for consolidation trade 2 or 3 for 1, whether it is for a superstar or not.
There is either too much talent or too much committed payroll across all 15 roster slots.
With what is very likely 3 decent players joining the team via those 2023 draft picks, the team will have no choice.

I don't think there is a scenario where Derrick Rose, Ryan Arcidiacono, and Trevor Keels are still on this team next year without a consolidation trade.

TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/15/2022  2:04 PM
nyvector16 wrote:
MS wrote:RJ and 6 1st rounders gets it done. He has PER inside the top 10. He’s keeping them in games and relevant.

We missed the last window as usual.

If we offered the house before the season it was possible.

I would only do this if we get to keep our own pick in 2023.
With so much talent in this next draft and this current regime's track record on picks, we have a good chance of picking up several good players.

knicks 2023 picks:

  • 2023 - Own
  • WAS 15-30 (Will likely convey if current trends persist)
  • DAL 11-30 (projected high teens w/ current standings)
  • DET 19-30 (This will not convey in 2023)

The Knicks are primed for consolidation trade 2 or 3 for 1, whether it is for a superstar or not.
There is either too much talent or too much committed payroll across all 15 roster slots.
With what is very likely 3 decent players joining the team via those 2023 draft picks, the team will have no choice.

I don't think there is a scenario where Derrick Rose, Ryan Arcidiacono, and Trevor Keels are still on this team next year without a consolidation trade.

I agree that we should be able to move up in this draft, probably in the 7-10 range depending on where we finish. We should have two picks in the teens unless the wheels fall off on this season, which might be a good thing this year.

Trust the Process
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/15/2022  2:17 PM
technomaster wrote:
TheGame wrote:SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team.

I think the biggest difference is that SGA is an elite fast twitch athlete. RJ is merely above average. You see it in the way they move, the way SGA can make adjustments mid-move and look fluid, while RJ looks somewhat rehearsed and mechanical.

Then there's the playmaking skills. The way SGA sees the floor, handles the rock, and passes is PG-like. Of course, this is helped by the way he can use quickness to get a step on defenders. RJ doesn't have as quick a step or as explosive, so everything is harder.
Maybe those skills are hidden away in RJ too, but he's just not as elite an athlete. (Kind of the way Ray Allen was just better all-around than Allan Houston

Rj has below average foot speed. Way below. He is really strong though but doesn't know how to use it yet.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39746
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

11/15/2022  3:33 PM
martin wrote:
technomaster wrote:
TheGame wrote:SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team.

I think the biggest difference is that SGA is an elite fast twitch athlete. RJ is merely above average. You see it in the way they move, the way SGA can make adjustments mid-move and look fluid, while RJ looks somewhat rehearsed and mechanical.

Then there's the playmaking skills. The way SGA sees the floor, handles the rock, and passes is PG-like. Of course, this is helped by the way he can use quickness to get a step on defenders. RJ doesn't have as quick a step or as explosive, so everything is harder.
Maybe those skills are hidden away in RJ too, but he's just not as elite an athlete. (Kind of the way Ray Allen was just better all-around than Allan Houston

Rj has below average foot speed. Way below. He is really strong though but doesn't know how to use it yet.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 75997
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/15/2022  5:20 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:
technomaster wrote:
TheGame wrote:SGA is a better version of RJ. He has the same drive to the basket game, but he is more athletic and more of a passer. Like RJ, he is not a great 3pt shooter or defender (but he is improving in both areas). I would be open to trading for him but I don’t know if he and RJ are a good fit together because neither are great outside shooters. I would make an offer of RJ, Toppin, and two first round picks for SGA. Brunson, SGA, Reddish, Randle, and Mitch is a solid team.

I think the biggest difference is that SGA is an elite fast twitch athlete. RJ is merely above average. You see it in the way they move, the way SGA can make adjustments mid-move and look fluid, while RJ looks somewhat rehearsed and mechanical.

Then there's the playmaking skills. The way SGA sees the floor, handles the rock, and passes is PG-like. Of course, this is helped by the way he can use quickness to get a step on defenders. RJ doesn't have as quick a step or as explosive, so everything is harder.
Maybe those skills are hidden away in RJ too, but he's just not as elite an athlete. (Kind of the way Ray Allen was just better all-around than Allan Houston

Rj has below average foot speed. Way below. He is really strong though but doesn't know how to use it yet.

Right. Thoughtful stuff, thanks.

RJ gained a ton of weight from his waist down and it’s slowed him down even more IMO.

I so badly wanna eat RJ crow from the crow buffet but I just don’t see it happening

Knicks 3 “best” players in RJ Randle Brunson have sucked ass on defense this year.

I do feel that the FO has to at least project that they’d like to build around an RJ type but think they move him in a heartbeat for the right return. Obviously same with Randle.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SGA is a better trade target than Mitchell

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy