WTF does the veteran Burks have to do with Grimes? Absolutely nothing. Grimes has been working every summer with Penny Hardaway on his playmaking skills. He's a good coach.I want to see if it will pay dividends at the point.
Werent you guys pushing Quickley as the starting PG of the future? Knew that wasnt going to happen his rookie season. I want to see if Grimes can play backup PG. You should too. If it doesnt work, fine. At least they gave it a shot.
Knixkik wrote:fishmike wrote:GustavBahler wrote:See it more as adding to his repertoire. Ideally Grimes shows the ability to run the point. That combined with his defense, keeps the Knicks competitive if Brunson is hurt. It also makes it easier for Thibs not to give Brunson too many minutes. Knixkik wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Rookie wrote:Yeah I think we saw last night that neither IQ or Deuce have the PG skills to take back control of the game when it starts to slip. Indy sped us up and we lost all composure. You know Rose would have settled that down. Yes it’s just preseason but I’ve seen us lose games just like this before. Indy had more energy and wants to run and play with pace. They killed us in points in the paint. I love the addition of Brunson. Rose needs to show he can stay healthy. I am just not a fan of IQ at PG. I hope we can bring Jokubaitus over towards the end of this season.
This is why I'd like to see Grimes get the chance to make a case to be the backup PG, post D. Rose. Whenever that is.
Grimes has been working on his playmaking skills in the offseason. He's also good enough to defend the other team's starting PG.
He’s switchable on defense, but playing him at PG on offense sort of takes away what he does best I think. That’s not to say he can’t be a playmaking wing.
so Grimes can be more like Burks was
Yeah we want to avoid the same mistake with grimes. He should be a better version of what Bullock was for this team.