DJMUSIC wrote:Let's pray Durant and Harden get back together eh? (Philly 76er's ?)You know the NBA is lucky its not filled with too many of the Stars such as Harden, Durant, Irving who can write NBA history By taking Pro organizations, fans for granted in great game of Basketball. I like what Durant went through to earn his NBA rings. Harden may never ever GET a NBA ring & Kyrie doesn't care.
When Wade, Shaq, Duncan, Kobe (RIP) these men were aging & ready to leave NBA NONE of em would be doing crap Durant, Harden and Kyrie Irving is doing today.
They are rich successful pro hoop stars & could care less for fans and integrity of NBA now, then OR in future 


As much as many Hoops fans Or some don't care for Lebron James, He has held the integrity of NBA game & TRIED TO Put TEAM Before himself as the older stars did:
B. Russell
M. Jordan
K.Jabbar
M.Johnson
K.Bryant
L.Bird
J.Irving
T.Duncan
B.Cousy
J. West
S.O'Neal
D.Wade
B.Cousy
W.Reed
G.Mikan
J. Havlichek
W.Frazier
I.Thomas
B.Cunningham
B.Walton
D.Bing
.
and so on, and so forth.
One day near future , Steph Curry . LBJ and few other active players will join Legends BY NOT SPOILING THE GAME
as James Harden (ringless NBA Title-less), Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving are trying to do in Today's NBA.
Lets hope present stars as Curry, Greek-Freak, Khawhi and many other today superstars DO NOT follow the Blueprint of Durant, Irving and Harden are painting
in their lame stories today in NBA. NBA is much BIGGER than stories of rich spoiled NBA players feel everything is about their Legacy and themselves.
Versus building a Team but letting Organization run them to build towards being a Winner.
I would not want to be bothered with such players whom when Going gets rough *they bail out ! It's Not over til we say it's over.
I could care less for Brooklyn Nets but likes of Durant and Irving has "SCREWED .." the Brooklyn Nets!




Sorry, but I feel this is a load of BS. I remember years ago KD had a comment about how ridiculous it is for sports writers to decide things like All Stars and MVPs vs the guys playing the game. You could make the argument that back in the 60's writers had more opportunity to watch more games but now it's ridiculous to suggest that.
Look at DeAndre Jordan. Did that guy fail anymore than Nash has? Jordan got shipped out as soon as he couldn't contribute to winning, why don't Nash and Marks get judged on the same standard? It's tough to argue that the Nets weren't less than the sum of their parts. Plus firing a front office is way, way simpler than trading a player. Those guys should have been let go right after getting swept by Boston.
The ridiculous Sean Marks presser where he "put Kyrie in his place" should have been cause for immediate termination. All because what- Kyrie said he wanted to work with the front office to build a winner, Marks took it as encroaching on his turf, then called another presser to publicly demean Kyrie. Incidentally, it's pretty clear that the Nets could have done a lot more to support Kyrie all season, especially as the ludicrous ness of the ban got exposed during season. (ie unvaccinated fans could attend games).
Bill Russell(!) showed player-coaches are a workable concept. Not sure why KD after 10+ years in the league doesn't have the expertise to say that the head coach isn't working out.