| Author | Thread |
|
martin
Posts: 68673 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
6/28/2022 6:23 PM
This is your episode of Knicks Gone Wild.
Hear me out. Knicks have oodles of draft picks. As many as most of the other teams that seem to have their hat in the game for Dejounte - Atlanta for one. Brunson, Dejounte, RJ, Randle, Mitch Part 2 (you all will hate me): Try to trade RJ for OG Anunoby ONLY because he has 2 more years on his deal and RJ's deal will be huge down the line. Brunson, Dejounte, OG Anunoby, Randle, Mitch. In the summer of 2024, you have Brunson $25M, Dejounte $17.7M, OG Anunoby $18.6M, Randle $25.6M, Mitch $13M, Obi $6.8M, IQ $4M, Grimes $2.3M, McBride $1.8M Those are rough numbers. That's total of $118M. Without Randle it would be $93M. In 2024 salary cap should be in the $130M mark range https://basketball.realgm.com/nba/info/salary_cap Can you give away Randle for nothing.... cause Kat would be an UFA. Brunson, Dejounte, OG Anunoby, Kat, Mitch. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
| AUTOADVERT |
[/URL]|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
6/28/2022 6:58 PM
Coming from me, this is a lot but I like where your head is at
 The Future is Bright!
|
|
gradyandrew
Posts: 22024 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/19/2021 Member: #8959 |
6/28/2022 7:07 PM
I always thought the play was to pair KAT with Randle. I think those guys are buddies.
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 37536 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
6/28/2022 7:32 PM
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
|
Jimbo5
Posts: 20874 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/12/2020 Member: #8854 |
6/28/2022 8:00 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: If something comes out of this for the knick then il be so excited for the season to start. Il be fine with Mitch, Randle, RJ, Brunson and Murray to start the season. With this line up i dont think Randle will be a problem, he might be the 3rd or 4th best player in this team. I just hope if he acts out, thibs will have no problem sitting him on the bench. Just let him bounce back and increase his trade value if he "plays well" with this new group, well and good but if he continues to act out, trade him for a star. The only downside for getting Murray is the price. 2 unprotected 1st, 2 pick swap and a young player. That young player will most likely be IQ, Obi or grimes. With brunson and Randle in the team, IQ or Obi might be part of the deal. |
|
Knixkik
Posts: 34903 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
6/28/2022 8:09 PM LAST EDITED: 6/28/2022 8:13 PM
martin wrote:This is your episode of Knicks Gone Wild. Obviously I hate moving Barrett in your example. But as far as Murray, I like him and would consider him. But I am concerned about the lack of shooting. Every player in that lineup does their best work in the paint. If we do sign Brunson I honestly want to see a Fournier/ Grimes SG position just for the shooting. If there’s a way to move Randle for a true stretch 4 (maybe for Hayward) or make some other sort of move to balance out the roster than sign me up. Noel traded to clear for Brunson. Burks, Reddish and 3 First round picks for Murray Randle for Hayward Brunson, Murray, Barrett, Hayward, Mitch lineup. If we are talking Knicks gone wild. |
|
Philc1
Posts: 26657 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 9/2/2020 Member: #8897 |
6/29/2022 8:07 AM LAST EDITED: 6/29/2022 8:08 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Obi, IQ, Keels and next year’s first plus one of the protected firsts we got during draft night. Throw in Rose to match the salaries |