[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Christian wood Malcolm brogdon
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/7/2022  3:22 PM
that would be my two knick targets. One PG one very under rated diverse C.

C-wood
F Randle
F Barret
G Reddish or Formier
PG Brogdon


Sign and trade Mitch to houston part of deal.

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
3/7/2022  3:34 PM
The Wood threads return! All is not lost Knicks fans!!!!
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/7/2022  3:56 PM
we've given up on kaminsky?!?
Nalod
Posts: 71086
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/7/2022  4:57 PM
Must have had a good game last night?
Brogdon good player. Bit over paid and injury concern?
Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
3/7/2022  5:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/7/2022  5:11 PM
Completely agree. Particularly about Brogdon. Injuries aside, he is a very solid option. Like Brunson, he would bring a completely different skill set to this team. I want one of those guys (or Gilgeous-Alexander as a pie in the sky option) as starting PG with Rose healthy. Nice thing about Brogdon is he can slide to the SG next to Rose. A finishing group of Rose, Brogdon, Barrett, Randle and a center can win games in the 4th quarter, which is this teams issue. A team with Randle and Barrett as the leads is completely salvageable in the short term, but need players who can completely take the ball out of Randles hands and just make him a finisher and pick and pop player. Brogdon is a good option. My best case scenario is a deal centered around Randle and the lottery pick for Zion, then our Dallas pick plus fillers (Burks, Noel, Walker etc) for Brogdon or Brunson (sign and trade )
Knixkik
Posts: 35411
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
3/7/2022  5:09 PM
Nalod wrote:Must have had a good game last night?
Brogdon good player. Bit over paid and injury concern?

Definitely not overpaid. But injuring prone yes.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39757
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
3/7/2022  6:31 PM
Marv wrote:we've given up on kaminsky?!?

Well...at least Allen Crabbe is technically a Knick.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/7/2022  6:44 PM
Marv wrote:we've given up on kaminsky?!?

I was actually hoping Andrew Bynum would come out of retirement.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
NYKBocker
Posts: 38396
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
3/7/2022  7:02 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Marv wrote:we've given up on kaminsky?!?

I was actually hoping Andrew Bynum would come out of retirement.

I was partial to BJ Mullens
HoustonSprewell84
Posts: 20178
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/6/2021
Member: #8931
3/7/2022  7:41 PM
I’ll take either, Brogdon would be idea. I think he’s a more realistic target than Brunson, he’s injury prone though. Just like Rose.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/7/2022  10:04 PM
Could I get some love for my favorite ex, Emmanuel Mudiay? Or, what about ex Knick Austin Rivers?
fishmike
Posts: 53803
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/8/2022  1:47 PM
We kinda have enough PFs and Brogdon is OK. Like if Burks were a slightly better PG he could be Brogdon. He's hurt a ton, isnt athletic and isnt a real move the needle guy. He's a nice shooter. I mean it the PG version of Burks so I dont really see the love
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578
3/8/2022  5:53 PM
I remember when Ricky Rubio was the answer. Or was it DJ Augustin?
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182
3/8/2022  8:23 PM
fishmike wrote:We kinda have enough PFs and Brogdon is OK. Like if Burks were a slightly better PG he could be Brogdon. He's hurt a ton, isnt athletic and isnt a real move the needle guy. He's a nice shooter. I mean it the PG version of Burks so I dont really see the love

The love comes from lack of reasonable options for the Knicks.

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
3/10/2022  4:26 PM
If its a flip Fournier +. Assets for Brogdon type of deal would you do it? Considering our bad FA options it may not be the worst possible thing. He aint a real PG but he'd boost our playmaking more than Fournier does while offering better D. Not as consistent of a shooter as Evan tho.
The Future is Bright!
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
3/10/2022  5:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/10/2022  5:27 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/pacers/comments/ta86cz/brogdon_trade_packages/

Pacers are incentivized to get rid of him because of Haliburton's rise and development.

The Future is Bright!
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27462
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
3/10/2022  6:35 PM
KnickDanger wrote:I remember when Ricky Rubio was the answer. Or was it DJ Augustin?

Jimmer Freddette/Adam Morrison. Take your pick.

You know I gonna spin wit it
fishmike
Posts: 53803
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/11/2022  8:42 AM
Jmpasq wrote:
fishmike wrote:We kinda have enough PFs and Brogdon is OK. Like if Burks were a slightly better PG he could be Brogdon. He's hurt a ton, isnt athletic and isnt a real move the needle guy. He's a nice shooter. I mean it the PG version of Burks so I dont really see the love

The love comes from lack of reasonable options for the Knicks.

thats not love. Thats desperation and a lack of patience. When you learn the difference you will see why guys like Turner and midget are not where you throw your resources. You can see the carousel going round and round. Knicks get Turner and Brogden, maybe get a little better and have a good year like we had last year ending in a first round exit follow by a sub .500 year followed by "we gotta fire the coach" followed by... 20 goto 10
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71086
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/11/2022  9:19 AM
fishmike wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
fishmike wrote:We kinda have enough PFs and Brogdon is OK. Like if Burks were a slightly better PG he could be Brogdon. He's hurt a ton, isnt athletic and isnt a real move the needle guy. He's a nice shooter. I mean it the PG version of Burks so I dont really see the love

The love comes from lack of reasonable options for the Knicks.

thats not love. Thats desperation and a lack of patience. When you learn the difference you will see why guys like Turner and midget are not where you throw your resources. You can see the carousel going round and round. Knicks get Turner and Brogden, maybe get a little better and have a good year like we had last year ending in a first round exit follow by a sub .500 year followed by "we gotta fire the coach" followed by... 20 goto 10

For many fans a path to include an established to plug in and assume their past success is given. Not their short comings.
The true path is things we can’t see. Its logical.

Lets talk about Trades, I like Mitch for Brunson despite it might cost us a pick to do so. Brunson had an awful game vs. us and like a youtube video some might have made a determination on that. What he does int he paint is a bit Tony parker like. He does it close to the ground as well. Crafty but with range. What chemistry can that bring to Randle to get some easier shots, Fornier who thrives when he does not have create too much, or a down hill RJ cutting thru the lane.
Dallas got Dinwiddie and thus Brunson is expendable if they can use him via trade.

I like mitch a lot and hope we can keep him or retain as trade value. But **** happens and I get why we couldn’t pay him more, or trade him given his foot and pending free agent status. Why pay up for him when you can get him as Free agent? thats why he was not valuable via trade.
fishmike
Posts: 53803
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/11/2022  10:39 AM
Nalod wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
fishmike wrote:We kinda have enough PFs and Brogdon is OK. Like if Burks were a slightly better PG he could be Brogdon. He's hurt a ton, isnt athletic and isnt a real move the needle guy. He's a nice shooter. I mean it the PG version of Burks so I dont really see the love

The love comes from lack of reasonable options for the Knicks.

thats not love. Thats desperation and a lack of patience. When you learn the difference you will see why guys like Turner and midget are not where you throw your resources. You can see the carousel going round and round. Knicks get Turner and Brogden, maybe get a little better and have a good year like we had last year ending in a first round exit follow by a sub .500 year followed by "we gotta fire the coach" followed by... 20 goto 10

For many fans a path to include an established to plug in and assume their past success is given. Not their short comings.
The true path is things we can’t see. Its logical.

Lets talk about Trades, I like Mitch for Brunson despite it might cost us a pick to do so. Brunson had an awful game vs. us and like a youtube video some might have made a determination on that. What he does int he paint is a bit Tony parker like. He does it close to the ground as well. Crafty but with range. What chemistry can that bring to Randle to get some easier shots, Fornier who thrives when he does not have create too much, or a down hill RJ cutting thru the lane.
Dallas got Dinwiddie and thus Brunson is expendable if they can use him via trade.

I like mitch a lot and hope we can keep him or retain as trade value. But **** happens and I get why we couldn’t pay him more, or trade him given his foot and pending free agent status. Why pay up for him when you can get him as Free agent? thats why he was not valuable via trade.

Brogden is a good player... he's not so good where he moves the needle much beyond what we have. He's not helped Indy much (winning). He's a nice rotation guy. We have those. We need impact guys (if we are spending)
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Christian wood Malcolm brogdon
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy