[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

New lineup I would use...
Author Thread
MaTT4281
Posts: 33764
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
11/9/2004  6:30 AM
TT at C?!?!?!?!?!
I don't think we have to even try that before we realize it doesn't work.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/9/2004  7:16 AM
Posted by MaTT4281:

TT at C?!?!?!?!?!
I don't think we have to even try that before we realize it doesn't work.
I think I'd rather play Andre Barrett at C
franco12
Posts: 33196
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
11/9/2004  8:49 AM
I'd like to see TT at power forward- having JYD in at the small forward mitigates his potential lack of rebounding.

But, if TT can't rebound at the PF position, it doesn't work.
joec32033
Posts: 30495
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
11/9/2004  10:43 AM
Posted by MaTT4281:

TT at C?!?!?!?!?!
I don't think we have to even try that before we realize it doesn't work.

I saw this in the Clippers game last night they played WIlcox and Brand and 3 guards basically...2 forwards and 3 guards...no actual center, and I loved the look of it.

TT can draw the opposing center out of the lane with his outside shooting.....I know it's a little drastic, but seriously, would we be at any smaller disadvantage with Nazr or Baker? Nazr and TT are about the same size....I think Nazr outweighs TT by 5 or 10 pounds...

What exactly do we lose? You play TT at center and Sweets or KT at PF it opens up time for Ariza at SF and Sweets and Ariz are good rebounders for their positions...

[Edited by - joec32033 on 11/09/2004 10:47:48]
~You can't run from who you are.~
New lineup I would use...

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy