[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks version Larry Johnson in today’s game
Author Thread
Knixkik
Posts: 35510
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
9/15/2021  10:45 AM
It’s the slowest time of year, so it’s always fun playing this game. As a Knicks fan in his mid 30s, I will always view the 5 year run 1996-2001 that included Houston and LJ for all 5 years (plus sprewell and Ewing for part of it) as the golden age to this point. LJ came into the league a stud SF who could do it all with his physical ability, but in his time with the Knicks he had to adapt his game after injuries and became an undersized PF with inside-out ability and defensive versatility, but he was no longer a star. I’m old school but I tend to think the nba talent is significantly better today and most role players from that era wouldn’t make it today with all of the talent today. I understand that all players from previous eras could adjust to some extent, but generally speaking the game just gets so much more skilled and more athletic every generation.

Someone like LJ, who was on that cusp of elite role player and low level star is an interesting case study today. Would he simply be a PJ Tucker level role player or something more? His post game wouldn’t fit today and his 3pt shooting was slow and mechanical. His shooting was viewed as a bonus then, but today he would likely be seen as somewhere between passable and liability. So let’s assume in another world he doesn’t dramatically change his game to adjust to 2021 and he sort of is what he is skill wise, what is his role in today’s game and how much success would he have based on his Knicks years ?

AUTOADVERT
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
9/15/2021  3:07 PM
melo?
zion?

role player in today's game, if not retired.

Nalod
Posts: 71530
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/15/2021  3:32 PM
I'd say at the very top of some evolutionary growth is Zion. Power and explosion. LJ in college and first few years was muscular for the day. But Larry did not exceed Charles Barkley. Charles in fact is really under rated if you look up the stats he hung. Zion is still so young and has yet to play a full season so don't want to get ahead of ourselves.

In a way Blake Griffith had the power and for a while put it all together with a decent outside shot before his injuries started to aggregate.
We also underestimate the no 2 alltime leading scorer who at PF was Karl Malone. Had good midrange.

At 6-8, 260 Lebron really is the evolved choice. He is not a SF, a PF, A 2 or a 1. He is what ever was needed that night.
These guys kind of make LJ a bit small in comparison. LJ had a great low post game for that era. His HOrnets days he could explode to the rim.

Knixkik
Posts: 35510
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
9/15/2021  4:19 PM
Nalod wrote:I'd say at the very top of some evolutionary growth is Zion. Power and explosion. LJ in college and first few years was muscular for the day. But Larry did not exceed Charles Barkley. Charles in fact is really under rated if you look up the stats he hung. Zion is still so young and has yet to play a full season so don't want to get ahead of ourselves.

In a way Blake Griffith had the power and for a while put it all together with a decent outside shot before his injuries started to aggregate.
We also underestimate the no 2 alltime leading scorer who at PF was Karl Malone. Had good midrange.

At 6-8, 260 Lebron really is the evolved choice. He is not a SF, a PF, A 2 or a 1. He is what ever was needed that night.
These guys kind of make LJ a bit small in comparison. LJ had a great low post game for that era. His HOrnets days he could explode to the rim.

He was a star in Charlotte. I’m talking more so in NY where his primary talents were toughness on both ends and leadership. He wasn’t elite at anything at that point. He was a role player who could play a little inside and out and averaged 12 and 6. My original question narrows down to is he still a role player today like a Jae Crowder/ PJ Tucker, or is he not an nba player?

Kemet
Posts: 22087
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2015
Member: #6148

9/15/2021  5:10 PM
INJURY PRONE Larry Johnson were a star in Charllotte and BUST in N.Y. !!!
We gave up a healthy Winning star Anthony Mason for a 5 yr Injury-Prone BUST Larry Johnson.
I dont recall Larry Johnson as a starter over Oakley, or Camby as a Knicks.
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
9/15/2021  5:45 PM
Knicks version Larry Johnson is a 3 inches shorter version of Randle and doesn't get most of his shots off in today's longer faster NBA. And doesn't have the lift or speed to get around anyone today. Possibly a niche career playing bully bull for parts of seasons until his back finally completely gives out.

Don't see GrandMama ever relegating himself to a Taj Gibson role... doing the "LJ" after setting a nasty screen?

fishmike
Posts: 53897
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/15/2021  6:29 PM
its RJ... he's got the frame to put on line backer caliber muscles. He gets into getting jacked and suddenly we have this 6'7 player who drains 3s, has a good handle and is a lefty slasher built like Brandon Jacobs. Sure... do step in the lane. He loves physical play and pushing his elbows into his opponents backs.

RJ + 5 years + 20 lbs of muscle = phuckin monster

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Knixkik
Posts: 35510
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
9/15/2021  8:48 PM
fishmike wrote:its RJ... he's got the frame to put on line backer caliber muscles. He gets into getting jacked and suddenly we have this 6'7 player who drains 3s, has a good handle and is a lefty slasher built like Brandon Jacobs. Sure... do step in the lane. He loves physical play and pushing his elbows into his opponents backs.

RJ + 5 years + 20 lbs of muscle = phuckin monster

LJ didn’t really have a ton of skills on the ball. He had his moved but not a lot of creativity off the dribble. Obviously Barrett has that. I think Jae Crowder is the closest thing we have to the LJ that arrived in NY before injuries set in even more.

Knixkik
Posts: 35510
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
9/15/2021  8:51 PM
Kemet wrote:INJURY PRONE Larry Johnson were a star in Charllotte and BUST in N.Y. !!!
We gave up a healthy Winning star Anthony Mason for a 5 yr Injury-Prone BUST Larry Johnson.
I dont recall Larry Johnson as a starter over Oakley, or Camby as a Knicks.

LJ was a full time starter with the Knicks until he retired. His first 2 years he played SF alongside Oakley and for his final 3 years he shifted to PF. Camby played some center but LJ started over him at PF. He wasn’t the same player as he was in Charlotte but he was far from a bust.

shinmen
Posts: 20367
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
9/16/2021  4:49 AM
Knixkik wrote:
Kemet wrote:INJURY PRONE Larry Johnson were a star in Charllotte and BUST in N.Y. !!!
We gave up a healthy Winning star Anthony Mason for a 5 yr Injury-Prone BUST Larry Johnson.
I dont recall Larry Johnson as a starter over Oakley, or Camby as a Knicks.

LJ was a full time starter with the Knicks until he retired. His first 2 years he played SF alongside Oakley and for his final 3 years he shifted to PF. Camby played some center but LJ started over him at PF. He wasn’t the same player as he was in Charlotte but he was far from a bust.

It's difficult to compare players from different eras. The defense was much tougher back then. Stephen Curry would be like his father and not a hall of famer if he had played in the 90's, that's not to say he is a bad player. The players today are not inherently better than the one from the previous era, they have the benefit of a more scientific approach to the game.
If LJ had played in today's NBA, he would have benefited from the same training, the same doctors. LJ was very athletic in Charlotte and shot reasonably well 3pts shots when it was not a crucial shot in the players arsenal. He brought what was needed to the team.

VDesai
Posts: 43064
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
9/16/2021  8:40 AM
I think Julius last year with peak of what Larry Johnson could have been had he stayed healthy. He had some explosivity when he came into the league, but that was gone once he came to NY with the back injuries. Still was a skilled player with post moves and the ability to step out. I think he'd be more of a corner 3 guy today where he was a bit all over the place with sometimes ill advised 3 ball in his Knick day. I think he adapted well to NY. Mase had a lot of good years after the trade as well, but he was a different sort of player. LJ was a better shooter mid range and out and Mase was more of an interior presence and offensive facilitator who's 15 footer got better as time went on. I think we needed Larry's offense a bit more at that time, but who knows...in the immediate aftermath Mase had the better few seasons.
VDesai
Posts: 43064
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
9/16/2021  8:48 AM
Thinking about LJ though it just makes me think of some of the great young duos of the 90s and how they never really got past the rookie deals. LJ/Mourning, Shaq/Penny, KG/Steph....prob a few more that I can't think off the top of my head. Came to some of the expansion franchises and were supposed to bring them some glory, but after a year or two they couldn't play together for some reason or another. IN some cases both players left.

LJ/Mourning looked they could dominate for a while. I think we played them in the 2nd round of the playoffs in our 60 win season under Riles- we were the 1 seed. I just remember all of those games being really close and Mourning basically looking like Junior Patrick Ewing in every way. Basically had all same moves and played the game the exact same way. It was crazy. Later when Zo went to Miami he became more of a defensive force, but that early Zo in Charlotte was a Ewing Mini me. LJ was one of these guys that was incredibly hard to guard because he was a tweener who was strong and athletic that no one could really match up with him (except maybe Mase ironically). Muggsy also used to really give the Knicks PG's problems with his D too.

Philc1
Posts: 28512
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

9/16/2021  9:05 AM
Last year’s Randle is very much Larry Johnson’s twin. Only thing is the nba was a half court league in the 90’s so LJ played SF most of his career. Randle can’t play SF in today’s spacing and pacing nba
Philc1
Posts: 28512
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

9/16/2021  9:06 AM
Knixkik wrote:
Kemet wrote:INJURY PRONE Larry Johnson were a star in Charllotte and BUST in N.Y. !!!
We gave up a healthy Winning star Anthony Mason for a 5 yr Injury-Prone BUST Larry Johnson.
I dont recall Larry Johnson as a starter over Oakley, or Camby as a Knicks.

LJ was a full time starter with the Knicks until he retired. His first 2 years he played SF alongside Oakley and for his final 3 years he shifted to PF. Camby played some center but LJ started over him at PF. He wasn’t the same player as he was in Charlotte but he was far from a bust.

Mase for LJ was an excellent trade for us. I loved Mase but the guy literally couldn’t put the ball in the ocean on offense and had to modify his free throw shooting for just to get that up to 73%


LJ is a big reason we get to the 1999 Finals

Philc1
Posts: 28512
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

9/16/2021  9:09 AM
VDesai wrote:Thinking about LJ though it just makes me think of some of the great young duos of the 90s and how they never really got past the rookie deals. LJ/Mourning, Shaq/Penny, KG/Steph....prob a few more that I can't think off the top of my head. Came to some of the expansion franchises and were supposed to bring them some glory, but after a year or two they couldn't play together for some reason or another. IN some cases both players left.

LJ/Mourning looked they could dominate for a while. I think we played them in the 2nd round of the playoffs in our 60 win season under Riles- we were the 1 seed. I just remember all of those games being really close and Mourning basically looking like Junior Patrick Ewing in every way. Basically had all same moves and played the game the exact same way. It was crazy. Later when Zo went to Miami he became more of a defensive force, but that early Zo in Charlotte was a Ewing Mini me. LJ was one of these guys that was incredibly hard to guard because he was a tweener who was strong and athletic that no one could really match up with him (except maybe Mase ironically). Muggsy also used to really give the Knicks PG's problems with his D too.

Of those duos you mentioned 2 involved a fraud (Penny, Steph). LJ and Alonzo had an interpersonal issue that was never really reported on until they had that now infamous fight on the floor of the Garden in game 5

Nalod
Posts: 71530
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/16/2021  9:17 AM
Revisit the trade for the moment.. LJ had back issue and a big contract. We made the deal with the CHANCE he could have recovered more of that explosive barkley like athletic ability. It did not happen but knicks were successful with him to a degree.
Mase? He was a bit of a failed experiment at Point featured by Nellie and despised by Ewing. We know we chose Ewing over Nellie and got JVG the gig.
So 20 some odd years later Mase was the better player but we would have had to pay him, which is not the issue but if we take the ball out of his hands does he have the same career he had post NY? Not well publically (but was written about) his partying ways an a bit of a time bomb with under age girls and a drug scene in NY. Did that continue in Charlotte? Maybe, but it he was not arrested nor got in trouble. It was suggeste he had to break some times in NY with some people. So there was a CHANCE of bad things happning.
On the court at the time of the trade you had both Starks and Mase. These were Riley’s guys who were now wanting to be paid and had made it to the NBA. They were “dogs” but a dog loses his edge when he comfy. Maybe one had to go. Maybe as the league was tighting up its image and rules two “loose cannons” on court lowered the basketball Iq a bit. they got untimely techs that was disruptive.

Im doing a lot of “Maybe’s” but from what I recall this was the environment at the time of the trade.

Lets not forget the strike short season we finished 8th was a disappointment that was about to get JVG fired. Instead the ball bounces in, coach unleashes what he got and makes the finals giving JVG a in contract automatic two year 2mm per extension which gets Grunfeld fired instead. That clause and playoff run changed his life forever. That kind of money 20 years ago was a life changer and the run gave him the status for the Rockets job that paid him very well.

With earnie gone you got Layden in, or a GM with a coach he did not pick with a roster not really suited for his style. Layden had good cred coming out of Utah, son of Frank who both did very well in SLC. But he was young and a neophyte to Dolan who was driving the ship and did not have a clue. This by hindsight and his own admission years later around the time he hired Phil. This is my theme for years that the fans ire toward Layden and Walsh for the blunders are on Dolan. Thats the constant. We were no in the room but I suggest that 100mm decisions and the lure of the starphuch were not how small market Utah and Indy kept long relevance in there respective eras. Isiah had great influence on Dolan but that direction was in step with Dolan before and after, so I’d say Dolan hired him to do what he wanted. Use the money advantage to rebuild quickly. It went badly. Donnie was forced on to Dolan after embarrassing lawsuits and 23 win season Larry and him warred, and the teams cap was embarrassingly 40mil or damn near 50% greater then the 2nd highest team and many picks traded. Picks that were Lamarcus Aldridge and Noah.

Fire Nellie to resign Ewing was shortsighted. But that moment was a big contributor to why Larry came to NY. It was a Dolanesque Starphuch. His contract was massive in the day.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
9/16/2021  10:25 AM
Larry would have found a way to contribute. I mean some team could use him as stand in the corner three point shooter. Or even an undersized center in today’s game. He was a good rebounder and his passing skill were not that bad. He adjust to his back ailment. I don’t see why Larry wouldn’t have adjusted to today’s game.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40008
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

9/16/2021  11:37 AM
fishmike wrote:its RJ... he's got the frame to put on line backer caliber muscles. He gets into getting jacked and suddenly we have this 6'7 player who drains 3s, has a good handle and is a lefty slasher built like Brandon Jacobs. Sure... do step in the lane. He loves physical play and pushing his elbows into his opponents backs.

RJ + 5 years + 20 lbs of muscle = phuckin monster

If RJ puts in 20lbs of muscle in five years he's retiring and replacing the Rock in Fast 13.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40008
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

9/16/2021  11:46 AM
Knixkik wrote:LJ didn’t really have a ton of skills on the ball. He had his moved but not a lot of creativity off the dribble. Obviously Barrett has that. I think Jae Crowder is the closest thing we have to the LJ that arrived in NY before injuries set in even more.

I'd say PJ Tucker would be the closest thing. I've poses his question before to my friends for guys like Mase, Corlis Williamson and Rodney Rogers. I think Knicks LJ would have the toughest time adjusting to today's game because his back killed his lateral quickness and he wouldn't be able to make up for it with physicality. I think Mase could definitely play today. The lack of three would hurt, but the passing, ball handling and defensive versatility would pop. I think Rodney Rodgers would definitely excel today. Plop him in at small ball center and you have instant havoc.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Nalod
Posts: 71530
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/16/2021  11:58 AM
RJ just turned 21 in June. With his build he very well could develop into something special. Larry had the unique strenght and explosive hops in college. RJ does not have this to that degree. Im sure he and other players improve with hard work but the “special” ability is given to players by god.
Thats not to say RJ does not have a low ceiling. In fact his strong fundamentals have kept him healthy as he does not rely on pure twitch ability to make things happen. Zion on the other hand has to do more of this if he wants a long career.
Larry’s footwork in the post was incredible and sustained his career.

Lets just just Lebron is from another planet regarding his body and longevity.

Knicks version Larry Johnson in today’s game

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy