[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Obi, IQ and RJ should be untouchable this offseason
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/8/2021  10:41 AM
unless something crazy like Booker is coming back.

These are 3 guys are ready to explode. IQ is working with KD personally. Obi has been in the gym non stop working with the dev team and has simply said of his second NBA season, “It’s going to be a lot different than the first season.”

Knicks have Jules/RJ/Obi/IQ/Mitch/Pele/Knox/Luca (8 guys) under contract next year
Knicks have 4 picks
Knicks could upgrade roster with plug and play guys like Conley/Oubre
Knicks could still have enough $ to bring Rose back

Rotation would look something like
PG Conley
SG RJ
SF Oubre
PF Jules
C Mitch
Bench: Rose, IQ, Obi, Luca

Deeper than last year, more athletic and more scoring punch. Thibs has 3 veteran attacking PGs who can shoot in Conley/Rose/Luca. Oubre is a wildcard but has another level to unlock. I like handing Thibs this challenge.

4 rookies on a 15 man roster (figure the 2nd rounders end up being 2-way guys or stash) is fine.

We are in a real position to build from within and if we can keep our young guys and draft well we end up with a roster loaded with young talent with some veteran floor generals and Thibs to push them

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
Panos
Posts: 30063
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/8/2021  10:55 AM
It will be a shame to lose Noel. He was key last year.
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/8/2021  11:28 AM
Panos wrote:It will be a shame to lose Noel. He was key last year.
he played really well and his strong regular season was a huge factor in ending up +10 in the win column. I also think he may not be worth the money he earned. He's got really bad hands and isnt explosive around the rim. He's a real offensive liability where as someone like Mitch was a dunking machine.

Ideally this is an area Obi steps up into. Like ATL uses Collins at center when Cappella sits and they play Gallo at the 4. Could be Pele, could be a FA we dont have on the radar like Javale McGee. I do think Noel got exposed and he's a bad fit next to Randle. Losing Burks/Bullock isnt easy either but I think Oubre could be better than both and we are looking for young guys to take those minutes.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 42615
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/8/2021  11:40 AM
Noel was a defensive machine in the regular season because of his court coverage and shotblocking, but against Atlanta they took advantage of that by tossing lobs and floaters over him. Then on offense they doubled off him or had Capela play a spy on Randle because he wasn't a threat to knock down a 12 footer. Durability will also always be an issue with him. That said, to me he is a fantastic player and a real reason why the team was so good defensively, so its a tough call. In like 20 total minutes Norvel Pelle looked like a pretty interesting poor man's approximation of Noel, but you can't really bank on that...
martin
Posts: 76105
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/8/2021  11:42 AM
fishmike wrote:
Panos wrote:It will be a shame to lose Noel. He was key last year.
he played really well and his strong regular season was a huge factor in ending up +10 in the win column. I also think he may not be worth the money he earned. He's got really bad hands and isnt explosive around the rim. He's a real offensive liability where as someone like Mitch was a dunking machine.

Ideally this is an area Obi steps up into. Like ATL uses Collins at center when Cappella sits and they play Gallo at the 4. Could be Pele, could be a FA we dont have on the radar like Javale McGee. I do think Noel got exposed and he's a bad fit next to Randle. Losing Burks/Bullock isnt easy either but I think Oubre could be better than both and we are looking for young guys to take those minutes.

Also, there are a good amount of bouncy bigs that may be able to guard out to 3pt line in this year's draft, got to get one and develop

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
VDesai
Posts: 42615
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/8/2021  11:50 AM
Personally, I don't think there are many players that come along that have Noel's athleticism and range at 6'11 and his ability to block shots without fouling. Think about it he is laterally quick enough to guard the perimeter and recover fast enough to protect the rim. He's like a Free safety playing basketball. He's in that Ratliff/Camby class (Camby of course could catch the ball, had great timing on the offensive glass and could dunk on anyone). He's a pretty rare talent on the defensive end that's why he was drafted high years ago. It seems like the 6'11" rangy athletes on D are always getting themselves hurt in the NBA. If we let him go, we may realize he was covering for a lot of defensive mistakes that are now more easily exposed. Guys like Taj Gibson are tough defensively, but he's more of a toughness/effort defender and doesn't have the court coverage that someone like Noel can give you. Robinson has the athletcism (and the injury prone nature), but not the court IQ that Noel has at this point in his career.
martin
Posts: 76105
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/8/2021  12:04 PM
VDesai wrote:Personally, I don't think there are many players that come along that have Noel's athleticism and range at 6'11 and his ability to block shots without fouling. Think about it he is laterally quick enough to guard the perimeter and recover fast enough to protect the rim. He's like a Free safety playing basketball. He's in that Ratliff/Camby class (Camby of course could catch the ball, had great timing on the offensive glass and could dunk on anyone). He's a pretty rare talent on the defensive end that's why he was drafted high years ago. It seems like the 6'11" rangy athletes on D are always getting themselves hurt in the NBA. If we let him go, we may realize he was covering for a lot of defensive mistakes that are now more easily exposed. Guys like Taj Gibson are tough defensively, but he's more of a toughness/effort defender and doesn't have the court coverage that someone like Noel can give you. Robinson has the athletcism (and the injury prone nature), but not the court IQ that Noel has at this point in his career.

Agree with all of this. Noel off the bench on a $6-10M manageable contract when your starter is making ~$2M is great value. Noel starting on a multiple year deal is a lot more questionable cause of his build and hands.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Chandler
Posts: 26774
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

7/8/2021  12:33 PM
Regarding Noel, it comes down to price for me. Pure back up. He is way too easy to deal with on the offensive end. As i mentioned many months ago there are lots of different type of "spacings" on offense. It's not just stretching the floor at 3 pt line. Mitch is a real asset on offense in at least the following regard. if his defender doesn't stick to him, he is an easy an big target for a lob. Jumps high, quick, great hands. The atlanta series could have been much different with Mitch in there. Capella had it way too easy

Regarding original post, I like Obi a lot but he is definitely touchable in my book. We just need to see good value in return. Knicks have a bit of a dilemma on their hands at the moment because they don't know what to think about Julius. Did he finally figure it out and will we see the same or better player going forward, in which case Obi is definitely touchable eg for some shooter or pg in return. Or was that an aberration for whatever reason in which case we shouldn't be paying the big bucks and in which case we may want/need Obi as an insurance policy in case Julius and Randle don't see eye to eye regarding the future.

All three are good eggs, with great attitudes and good work ethic. Super happy about that

(5)(7)
Knixkik
Posts: 35423
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/8/2021  12:55 PM
Obi i would still move in the right deal simply because he's stuck behind our best player. But no doubt Randle, Barrett, IQ, Obi, and Mitch are our core until proven otherwise.
Nalod
Posts: 71102
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/8/2021  1:31 PM
Imagine a world were OBI earns more minutes. His trade value moves higher. Makes resigning Randle harder.
Or we trade Randle for great value.

Fans take last year an move it forward. We did not see randle coming. Why should we see everything else?

fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/8/2021  3:00 PM
martin wrote:
VDesai wrote:Personally, I don't think there are many players that come along that have Noel's athleticism and range at 6'11 and his ability to block shots without fouling. Think about it he is laterally quick enough to guard the perimeter and recover fast enough to protect the rim. He's like a Free safety playing basketball. He's in that Ratliff/Camby class (Camby of course could catch the ball, had great timing on the offensive glass and could dunk on anyone). He's a pretty rare talent on the defensive end that's why he was drafted high years ago. It seems like the 6'11" rangy athletes on D are always getting themselves hurt in the NBA. If we let him go, we may realize he was covering for a lot of defensive mistakes that are now more easily exposed. Guys like Taj Gibson are tough defensively, but he's more of a toughness/effort defender and doesn't have the court coverage that someone like Noel can give you. Robinson has the athletcism (and the injury prone nature), but not the court IQ that Noel has at this point in his career.

Agree with all of this. Noel off the bench on a $6-10M manageable contract when your starter is making ~$2M is great value. Noel starting on a multiple year deal is a lot more questionable cause of his build and hands.

this is where I am... I LOVED Noel this season and he's one of several moves that really says our FO knows and understands value.

I think some teams will see what he did with the Knicks throw something like 3/$60 at Noel and for some teams that might even be worth it. I dont think with the shortcomings above that makes sense for us. I would rather add higher upside guys and see what this COY can do with that. We arent winning a title next year unless a lot of guys get hurt, but we should be a winning team, in the playoffs and be fighting for a chance to advance to round 2 while seeing young guys on the roster take more steps forward (Mitch/RJ/IQ/Obi/KNox/etc etc)

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

7/8/2021  3:26 PM
fishmike wrote:Obi, IQ and RJ should be untouchable this offseason

These are 3 guys are ready to explode.


From a principle standpoint, since it was a full regime change, Leon Rose and Thibs should not trade Toppin nor Quickley this offseason. It sends the wrong message about what the franchise is doing.

From a market reality standpoint, since it was a full regime change, Leon Rose and Thibs should trade Toppin as soon as possible. It's the best resource management decision for the franchise long term.

Sam Hinkie took a lot of **** for trading Michael Carter Williams so quickly after showing promise his rookie year. But Hinkie knew what the long term projection looked like. MCW was going to regress and the league was was going to catch up to his flaws and figure out how to play him better and even volume counting stats would not help the Sixers. You can see the backlash Hinkie took, but it was the right decision.

Punting on Knox and Frank N after their rookie years would have been the right decision. Knox's value was as high as it was ever going to get after his rookie year. Things that are seen now as consistent troubling problems would have looked possibly fixable by another overly optimistic team back then.

A complication is if you trade a rookie early in his rookie contract, his agent and his representation will **** a brick and won't stop attacking you in the press. They don't have a choice, it makes them look bad to future possible clients. But sometimes you see a player and realize you just need to cut bait.

Sam Hinkie just didn't give a **** what anyone thought of him. It, in part, cost him his NBA career. It's a functional problem for the NBA when winning basketball games comes low on the list behind internal league traditions and power brokering that don't actually help anyone build a better team.

Vesting for the 3rd and 4th year team option years for NBA first round picks should come with an automatic trigger system out of the hands of franchises front offices.

You produce at certain benchmarks/playing time requirements, your team options are picked up automatically. If you don't, they don't. The Rookie Scale Exception is horribly broken at this point. There is zero reason why a guy who works as incredibly hard as Xavier Tillman might struggle to reach his litmus to get an NBA pension but a pair of Jogging Kings like Knox and Frank Ntilikina are eating up service time as they lounge around like *******s.

No one on the Knicks roster is untouchable. There's a principle issue against trading Toppin and Quickley this offseason. But the best market place move would be to trade Toppin ASAP. Quickley looks like he will pan out and I'm glad he's on this team. RJB is producing past the actual market rate of his rookie contract, so he's providing massive value.

The league administration forcing the firing and blacklisting of Hinkie only set the stage for a future labor war that will devastate the league at some point.

One year that I went to MIT Sloan, a guy had a position paper ( and like many there, he was looking for an entry level job in the NBA) where he parroted something David Stern said years ago. Just give the NBPA their share of the BRI that's been negotiated, and let them decide how to divide the money without a formal structure like max contracts, rookie scales, etc, etc. It's actually a good idea because it would naturally dovetail into a NFL salary model. Wouldn't it have been nice if STAT stopped showing up to ****ing film festivals and blogging about wine baths and started working on defense like his job was on the line because his job would have been on the line in that kind of system? Wouldn't it be nice if every year was a contract year for everyone and all players have to fight like their very jobs depended on it all the time? But by saying this, this guy was never going to get hired by anyone. Because it bucks the "establishment" when it would actually foster a system that would help teams rebuild much faster and allow GMs to actually make real moves to help their teams win.

The agents in the NBA are one of the worst things to happen to the entire sport because so much of what they do actually hamstrings teams from finding practical pathways to actually win basketball games. My take on agents? If you take a job where you are paid to suck dick, don't throw a tantrum when someone standing over you expects you to swallow.

The NY Knicks should not trade Obi Toppin. But if they are doing their jobs right, they should desperately want to pull that trigger.

fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/8/2021  3:34 PM
Knixkik wrote:Obi i would still move in the right deal simply because he's stuck behind our best player. But no doubt Randle, Barrett, IQ, Obi, and Mitch are our core until proven otherwise.
it would be such a sell low... he could be a monster. He's so long, fast and athletic. He works so hard and the coaching staff had him purely focused on doing the team stuff first. Its not gonna be long before he's good at those things he's shown improvement on (defense, handle, boxing out, not going for head fakes) AND he starts looking for his own shot watch out. I suspect its next year at some point. I really hope we wait and see
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/8/2021  3:42 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/8/2021  3:44 PM
Would trade any player if it meant improving team.

That being said
Number 1. Randle played like a franchise player regular season/- got to give him another year/ not tradable

Barrett is asset 2 If we trade for any big name he is GONE for reasonable compensation unless it’s a salary dump. In all likely hood going nowhere
Mitch asset 3. I’d love to say he’s untouchable but he still has a lot to prove. That being said he’s going no where
After that I don’t see 1 player that’s untouchable if it’s a trade that makes team better.

RIP Crushalot😞
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

7/8/2021  5:43 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Would trade any player if it meant improving team.

That being said
Number 1. Randle played like a franchise player regular season/- got to give him another year/ not tradable

Barrett is asset 2 If we trade for any big name he is GONE for reasonable compensation unless it’s a salary dump. In all likely hood going nowhere
Mitch asset 3. I’d love to say he’s untouchable but he still has a lot to prove. That being said he’s going no where
After that I don’t see 1 player that’s untouchable if it’s a trade that makes team better.

Agreed. For the right deal all of them can be shipped out.
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

7/8/2021  7:23 PM
fishmike wrote:it would be such a sell low... he could be a monster. He's so long, fast and athletic. He works so hard and the coaching staff had him purely focused on doing the team stuff first. Its not gonna be long before he's good at those things he's shown improvement on (defense, handle, boxing out, not going for head fakes) AND he starts looking for his own shot watch out. I suspect its next year at some point. I really hope we wait and see


Stop Loss


Trading Obi Toppin right now would be a Stop Loss


https://hoopshabit.com/2016/02/06/revisiting-carter-williams-deal-shaped-76ers-season/


As the season progresses, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that the Sixers converted a low-key heist at the cost of receiving initial backlash. With a top-3 protected Lakers pick in hand, Sam Hinkie has plenty of options. He could hold onto the pick and hope it conveys either this season or next season in what’s projected to be a deep 2017 draft. Also, it could be useful for another rebuilding organization who’s looking to deal a star or pseudo-star.

Realizing that Carter-Williams plateaued and limited Philadelphia’s ceiling moving forward, Hinkie has opened up many routes the Sixers can take in order to find their next ideal point guard. Whether it’s via the draft or pillaging through the free agent market, the Sixers’ ceiling won’t be leveled by having a middling point guard control the offense.

This isn’t a knock on Carter-Williams’ game. He’s one of the league’s most versatile options at the point and has a great frame to showcase his athleticism and vision. However, Carter-Williams hasn’t developed into a star point guard in a league filled with them.

With Ish Smith completely overhauling the Sixers’ offensive game plan, Brett Brown at least has the confidence that he’ll have a point guard who can be a solid contributor in the league. Smith doesn’t have the ceiling or intangibles of MCW, but averaging 15.8 PPG and dishing out 7.9 APG warrants extensive playing time on a team devoid of legitimate backcourt talent.

If the Lakers pick doesn’t convey or the Sixers get terrible draft luck, the team won’t be in a position to draft the best player available .... With Smith’s rise to manning the team’s lead point guard role, and thriving in the position, the point guard spot has become less of an issue for the Sixers.

Even though the Sixers are 13-66 since Carter-Williams headed north, Smith has been the necessity at point guard who has given both Nerlens Noel and Jahlil Okafor a boost in efficiency....

Trading Carter-Williams was a questionable call at the time, but it’s provided Philadelphia with options — a facet of making deals and decisions that Hinkie covets.


http://thecomeback.com/freezingcoldtakes/nba/a-look-back-at-some-people-who-panned-the-sixers-and-the-process-for-trading-michael-carter-williams.html


How did that turn out? Not well. Carter-Williams found himself riding the Milwaukee bench by late November of the 2015-2016 season after coming back from an injury. A torn labrum in his left hip would later put him on the shelf for the remainder of the season, and he would eventually be traded away to the Chicago Bulls this past October. So much for taking flight under Kidd, right?


https://www.phillyvoice.com/one-year-later-looking-back-michael-carter-williams-trade/


Trading Carter-Williams at least seems like it was the right move. The Bucks stumbled into the playoffs at the end of last season and they have the fifth worst point differential in the league to go with a 22-32 record in 2015-16. Windhorst and Marc Stein report that Carter-Williams is “undeniably gettable” at the deadline. Zach Lowe said the Bucks “remain unconvinced” that MCW is the long-term answer at point guard.

The Bucks have been slightly better on both ends of the floor with Carter-Williams on the court this year, but the poor shooting is still a big problem. MCW is shooting 29 percent from three-point range and 66 percent from the free-throw line. At 24 years old, Carter-Williams making major improvements in those areas starts to become a tougher sell. Not impossible, but not necessarily likely either.

*****

While a team won't know what a player will fully be until the All Star break of his third full season ( barring major injury or some other bizarre circumstance limiting playing time like off the court troubles), they will generally understand if the prospect in question can make it in the NBA long term or not.

A) This is a legit NBA player who helps you win basketball games, we just don't know if he will hit his ceiling

or

B) This is not a legit NBA player and sadly just a warm body to fill the roster, his best upside is as a journeyman if he's lucky

There are just some careers where it's clear a young newcomer will make it in that industry very early or not. This is no longer a question of how good will Obi Toppin will be, this is now a question on if he will be able to stay on a roster once his "rookie shine" wears off. I keep hearing how good he will be JUST IF the Knicks do this, get that, change this, adjust that, tweak this, modify that and on and on and on and on.

Let's not mince this anymore - If you give Toppin 25-30-35 minutes a night, especially for a Defense First/Defense Always hardass coach like Thibs, then Good Old Tom will pull his hair out. Toppin might give you 15 points a night and a highlight reel alley oop dunk every 3 games. But he's giving up 50 points a night as a walking turnstile on defense. Close to none of you are pointing out nor accepting that Toppin has no real defensive position that fits the modern game and that you can't win basketball games if you are coughing up points by the metric ton with a shaky team defense.

You don't magically become a league average defender in one offseason from starting as an Orange Traffic Cone

You don't magically develop an above average consistent 3 point shot in one offseason.

You don't magically learn to create your own shot in the NBA in one offseason

You don't magically develop functional footwork or develop a league average handle in one offseason.

Toppin was marketed as "pro ready" and what is he now? Two years away from being two years away? That makes the Knicks a glorified farm team and frankly they can't afford to be a farm team with decades of woe just past them.

Trading Toppin now is a Stop Loss. In the same way that Hinkie, with gigantic balls no doubt, traded MCW when he recognized the player he had, not the player he wanted MCW to be.

Leon Rose made a lot of good decisions in his first year. This is not one of them. Part of being a good leader is knowing when to recognize and move past a mistake. This is how Bill Belichick and Billy Beane have survived so long in professional sports.

foosballnick
Posts: 21529
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

7/8/2021  9:03 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
fishmike wrote:it would be such a sell low... he could be a monster. He's so long, fast and athletic. He works so hard and the coaching staff had him purely focused on doing the team stuff first. Its not gonna be long before he's good at those things he's shown improvement on (defense, handle, boxing out, not going for head fakes) AND he starts looking for his own shot watch out. I suspect its next year at some point. I really hope we wait and see


Stop Loss


Trading Obi Toppin right now would be a Stop Loss


https://hoopshabit.com/2016/02/06/revisiting-carter-williams-deal-shaped-76ers-season/


As the season progresses, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that the Sixers converted a low-key heist at the cost of receiving initial backlash. With a top-3 protected Lakers pick in hand, Sam Hinkie has plenty of options. He could hold onto the pick and hope it conveys either this season or next season in what’s projected to be a deep 2017 draft. Also, it could be useful for another rebuilding organization who’s looking to deal a star or pseudo-star.

Realizing that Carter-Williams plateaued and limited Philadelphia’s ceiling moving forward, Hinkie has opened up many routes the Sixers can take in order to find their next ideal point guard. Whether it’s via the draft or pillaging through the free agent market, the Sixers’ ceiling won’t be leveled by having a middling point guard control the offense.

This isn’t a knock on Carter-Williams’ game. He’s one of the league’s most versatile options at the point and has a great frame to showcase his athleticism and vision. However, Carter-Williams hasn’t developed into a star point guard in a league filled with them.

With Ish Smith completely overhauling the Sixers’ offensive game plan, Brett Brown at least has the confidence that he’ll have a point guard who can be a solid contributor in the league. Smith doesn’t have the ceiling or intangibles of MCW, but averaging 15.8 PPG and dishing out 7.9 APG warrants extensive playing time on a team devoid of legitimate backcourt talent.

If the Lakers pick doesn’t convey or the Sixers get terrible draft luck, the team won’t be in a position to draft the best player available .... With Smith’s rise to manning the team’s lead point guard role, and thriving in the position, the point guard spot has become less of an issue for the Sixers.

Even though the Sixers are 13-66 since Carter-Williams headed north, Smith has been the necessity at point guard who has given both Nerlens Noel and Jahlil Okafor a boost in efficiency....

Trading Carter-Williams was a questionable call at the time, but it’s provided Philadelphia with options — a facet of making deals and decisions that Hinkie covets.


http://thecomeback.com/freezingcoldtakes/nba/a-look-back-at-some-people-who-panned-the-sixers-and-the-process-for-trading-michael-carter-williams.html


How did that turn out? Not well. Carter-Williams found himself riding the Milwaukee bench by late November of the 2015-2016 season after coming back from an injury. A torn labrum in his left hip would later put him on the shelf for the remainder of the season, and he would eventually be traded away to the Chicago Bulls this past October. So much for taking flight under Kidd, right?


https://www.phillyvoice.com/one-year-later-looking-back-michael-carter-williams-trade/


Trading Carter-Williams at least seems like it was the right move. The Bucks stumbled into the playoffs at the end of last season and they have the fifth worst point differential in the league to go with a 22-32 record in 2015-16. Windhorst and Marc Stein report that Carter-Williams is “undeniably gettable” at the deadline. Zach Lowe said the Bucks “remain unconvinced” that MCW is the long-term answer at point guard.

The Bucks have been slightly better on both ends of the floor with Carter-Williams on the court this year, but the poor shooting is still a big problem. MCW is shooting 29 percent from three-point range and 66 percent from the free-throw line. At 24 years old, Carter-Williams making major improvements in those areas starts to become a tougher sell. Not impossible, but not necessarily likely either.

*****

While a team won't know what a player will fully be until the All Star break of his third full season ( barring major injury or some other bizarre circumstance limiting playing time like off the court troubles), they will generally understand if the prospect in question can make it in the NBA long term or not.

A) This is a legit NBA player who helps you win basketball games, we just don't know if he will hit his ceiling

or

B) This is not a legit NBA player and sadly just a warm body to fill the roster, his best upside is as a journeyman if he's lucky

There are just some careers where it's clear a young newcomer will make it in that industry very early or not. This is no longer a question of how good will Obi Toppin will be, this is now a question on if he will be able to stay on a roster once his "rookie shine" wears off. I keep hearing how good he will be JUST IF the Knicks do this, get that, change this, adjust that, tweak this, modify that and on and on and on and on.

Let's not mince this anymore - If you give Toppin 25-30-35 minutes a night, especially for a Defense First/Defense Always hardass coach like Thibs, then Good Old Tom will pull his hair out. Toppin might give you 15 points a night and a highlight reel alley oop dunk every 3 games. But he's giving up 50 points a night as a walking turnstile on defense. Close to none of you are pointing out nor accepting that Toppin has no real defensive position that fits the modern game and that you can't win basketball games if you are coughing up points by the metric ton with a shaky team defense.

You don't magically become a league average defender in one offseason from starting as an Orange Traffic Cone

You don't magically develop an above average consistent 3 point shot in one offseason.

You don't magically learn to create your own shot in the NBA in one offseason

You don't magically develop functional footwork or develop a league average handle in one offseason.

Toppin was marketed as "pro ready" and what is he now? Two years away from being two years away? That makes the Knicks a glorified farm team and frankly they can't afford to be a farm team with decades of woe just past them.

Trading Toppin now is a Stop Loss. In the same way that Hinkie, with gigantic balls no doubt, traded MCW when he recognized the player he had, not the player he wanted MCW to be.

Leon Rose made a lot of good decisions in his first year. This is not one of them. Part of being a good leader is knowing when to recognize and move past a mistake. This is how Bill Belichick and Billy Beane have survived so long in professional sports.


For someone who claims to have attended MIT I find your comparison tying MCW to Obi curious. The concept of "Stop-Loss" as it pertains to professional sports - roster asset management really only is optimized if there is a recognized significant decline in asset depreciated value. In the case of MCW, coming off his rookie season where is started 70 games and averaged almost 35 mpg - his trade value was much higher than a player like Obi, who did not start and played limited minutes behind Randle. In other words, Hinkie traded MCW at a high - maximizing the longer term stop loss replacement value - while Rose would essentially be trading Obi at a low, with likely much more minimal return.

Further - another factor of stop loss is the replacement effort and value that would be saved/redeployed by moving an asset off your books. In other words, what is the value of Obi's replacement on the team should he be traded? If Obi is removed, what is his replacement and at what cost against the cap (his current salary will be team controllable between ~$5M - 7M over the next 3 years)? Since any replacement of Obi is an unknown at this time, no fan can accurately say with confidence what the value would be to remove Obi at his salary and re-deploy resources and effort to player X at $X salary.

To recap - the situations are not comparable:

MCW - starter with high usage rate for 1.5 seasons with Sixers a lottery level team, lead the team in minutes, second in scoring. High-ish trade value, high potential stop-loss value, younger potential replacements already on roster (Ish Smith, Tony Wroten).

Obi Toppin - non-starter with low usage, low minutes, low scoring on a playoff team. Lower trade value, low stop-loss value - no current replacement on roster.

If the objective is to accumulate, develop and improve assets in order to better position a roster to become a perpetual contender - trading a cheap and relatively unknown commodity with minimal depreciable value - does not seem prudent. The objective should be to exhaust efforts while that asset's cost is low and build that asset's value for either use or trade.

Frank would be an example of a player the team should cut ties with after efforts to build/display his overall value to the team have been exhausted.

I'll caveat this all by saying that if some other team is willing to pay a high price for Obi (which is likely doubtful right now) - then Rose should consider trading him. Also, if the Knicks bring in another PF who has higher value than Obi - the situation will certainly be different next season. But to just dump him for Stop-Loss at this point makes little sense given the above circumstances.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

7/9/2021  12:33 AM
VDesai wrote:Noel was a defensive machine in the regular season because of his court coverage and shotblocking, but against Atlanta they took advantage of that by tossing lobs and floaters over him. Then on offense they doubled off him or had Capela play a spy on Randle because he wasn't a threat to knock down a 12 footer. Durability will also always be an issue with him. That said, to me he is a fantastic player and a real reason why the team was so good defensively, so its a tough call. In like 20 total minutes Norvel Pelle looked like a pretty interesting poor man's approximation of Noel, but you can't really bank on that...

We should try to get an asset for S&T him. Who I don’t know but more than signing him letting him walk for nothing would be the most regrettable thing. He’s talented but too talented to pay him the reserve salary his game deserves.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
Philc1
Posts: 28301
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

7/9/2021  3:04 AM
Knixkik wrote:Obi i would still move in the right deal simply because he's stuck behind our best player. But no doubt Randle, Barrett, IQ, Obi, and Mitch are our core until proven otherwise.

It would have to be for a superstar like Lillard. Obi I would offer in a package for Lillard but not RJ

Philc1
Posts: 28301
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

7/9/2021  3:10 AM
fishmike wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Obi i would still move in the right deal simply because he's stuck behind our best player. But no doubt Randle, Barrett, IQ, Obi, and Mitch are our core until proven otherwise.
it would be such a sell low... he could be a monster. He's so long, fast and athletic. He works so hard and the coaching staff had him purely focused on doing the team stuff first. Its not gonna be long before he's good at those things he's shown improvement on (defense, handle, boxing out, not going for head fakes) AND he starts looking for his own shot watch out. I suspect its next year at some point. I really hope we wait and see

Obi’s trade value might be higher than you think. Yeah he’s buried behind Randle and the know nothing media bashed the pick but he played well in the playoffs and GMs of teams like the blazers know more than a clown like Max Kellerman

Obi, IQ and RJ should be untouchable this offseason

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy