[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Phoenix. Young and loaded with their own draft picks
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/23/2021  3:42 PM
They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

6/23/2021  4:09 PM
And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/23/2021  4:13 PM
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

RIP Crushalot😞
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

6/23/2021  4:22 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2021  4:34 PM
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.
Clippers did it through a trade and a FA that wanted to play in that city. The Bucks are built around Giannis and Middleton who they drafted. Its incredibly rare to field an elite team that doesnt have foundation guys who were drafted by that team. Those are special circumstances. You need to hit on a couple of these guys and bring them up.

I think RJ projects to an all star. He's just really good and getting better in every way. He's got a good physical profile and his shooting sustains he's just gonna be a monster player for us.

I still have high hopes on Mitch as well. He needs to mature and improve a lot fundamentals but he brings so much and could really be a Camby/Tyson type hybrid... sprinkle in some Deke maybe as well.

IQ/Obi are both showing a ton of promise. Lot of upside there.

Luka is a wildcard. So is Frank for that matter. I think think there is a useful NBA player there, but I suspect we see it somewhere else. That being said who knows. I feel like the staff and team actually like him. I would be surprised to see Frank back on a Luka type deal... 3 years $10mm and team option years

Its REALLY hard to tell early on. You just gotta keep adding these guys and working on them. Who could have predicted the kind of player arc you see from a guy like Bam Adebayo?

I am just thrilled that at least its clear we are using this process. Building assets, fielding cheap home grown rotation players, having a chance on a prospect that might not have been a blue chipper go POP. The league is full of them... nice to see the Knicks bobbing for those apples. Makes the team so much more exciting

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2021  4:44 PM
Welpee wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
and have the Porzingis assets, RJ, IQ, Mitch and Obi to show for it with Knox/Frank being whiffs. I would say we are on the right path here.

The key is to add impact talent this year in FA. That is what allows you to keep all these picks and hopefully draft a project or two. I mean what if we draft Shariff Cooper at 21, let him run the G league team and it turns out he develops a nice stroke and is the next Isaiah Thomas... you know the healthy one.

Not saying the above will happen but at least I feel like we are playing that game (if they deem it worthy of spending the asset/pick on)

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
NYKBocker
Posts: 38399
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/23/2021  4:52 PM
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Yup

Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

6/23/2021  5:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/23/2021  5:31 PM
fishmike wrote:Clippers did it through a trade and a FA that wanted to play in that city. The Bucks are built around Giannis and Middleton who they drafted.
Actually they didn't draft Middleton, he was drafted by Detroit and played his first season with them. I believe Giannis and DiVincenzo are the only significant players on their roster who the Bucks drafted.
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

6/23/2021  5:34 PM
fishmike wrote:
Welpee wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
and have the Porzingis assets, RJ, IQ, Mitch and Obi to show for it with Knox/Frank being whiffs. I would say we are on the right path here.

The key is to add impact talent this year in FA. That is what allows you to keep all these picks and hopefully draft a project or two. I mean what if we draft Shariff Cooper at 21, let him run the G league team and it turns out he develops a nice stroke and is the next Isaiah Thomas... you know the healthy one.

Not saying the above will happen but at least I feel like we are playing that game (if they deem it worthy of spending the asset/pick on)

Don't get me wrong, I think we're finally on the right path. Just don't think we can look at what worked for another team and think we should pattern ourselves after them. Each situation is going to be different.
Uptown
Posts: 31303
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

6/23/2021  5:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/23/2021  5:55 PM
fishmike wrote:
Welpee wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
and have the Porzingis assets, RJ, IQ, Mitch and Obi to show for it with Knox/Frank being whiffs. I would say we are on the right path here.

The key is to add impact talent this year in FA. That is what allows you to keep all these picks and hopefully draft a project or two. I mean what if we draft Shariff Cooper at 21, let him run the G league team and it turns out he develops a nice stroke and is the next Isaiah Thomas... you know the healthy one.

Not saying the above will happen but at least I feel like we are playing that game (if they deem it worthy of spending the asset/pick on)

Its funny you mention Shariffe Cooper. I have watched him play at least 5 times during the season and have been watching a ton of video on him over the last week. I love his game! His vision. amd cout awareness is elite. Best passing pg to come out of college in a long time. He is impossible to keep out of the paint because of his quickness, and he draws a ton of fouls. He shoots above 80% from the line which is encouraging considering his poor 3 pt %. I think his shot can be fixed ( he has a slow release and leans back on the jumper). Unfortunately his height can't be fixed. He would be targeted on defense. Sheriffe is a baller, though and Im torn on him.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

6/23/2021  5:48 PM
The Knicks are in a good place for once. Not great, but you got to work to figure out a reason to complain
The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2021  5:56 PM
Uptown wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Welpee wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
and have the Porzingis assets, RJ, IQ, Mitch and Obi to show for it with Knox/Frank being whiffs. I would say we are on the right path here.

The key is to add impact talent this year in FA. That is what allows you to keep all these picks and hopefully draft a project or two. I mean what if we draft Shariff Cooper at 21, let him run the G league team and it turns out he develops a nice stroke and is the next Isaiah Thomas... you know the healthy one.

Not saying the above will happen but at least I feel like we are playing that game (if they deem it worthy of spending the asset/pick on)

Its funny you mention Shariffe Cooper. I have watched him play at least 5 times during the season and have been watching a ton of video on him over the last week. I love his game! His vision. amd cout awareness is elite. Best passing pg to come out of college in a long time. He is impossible to keep out of the paint because of his quickness, and he draws a ton of fouls. He shoots above 80% from the line which is encouraging considering his poor 3 pt %. I think his shot can be fixed ( he has a slow release and leans back on the jumper). Unfortunately his height can't be fixed. Sheriffe is a baller, though and Im torn on him.

he's small but really explosive and will use physical play to get past guys. I was really impressed by that and his motor is simply incredible. People think Thibs only loves great defensive players its just not true he loves aggressive play and that guy ATTACKS.

I dont follow enough of the other guys to say we should take him over x,y or z. He's an example of a high ceiling guy who's going to be there around 19-21. I mean if he cant shoot he's gonna be Moochie Norris, but geeze if he could just be respectful from there WOW he's a guy who could pop. I love these threads and how passionate posters get about this guy and that. Its really fun and one of the bests parts of this forum

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Chandler
Posts: 26774
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/23/2021  7:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/23/2021  7:16 PM
Uptown wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Welpee wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Welpee wrote:And then you have Milwaukee and the Clippers who built their final four teams with a different template. Bottom line is there are several paths to building a winner. We have to determine what's the best course for our team based on our assets.

Yeah but we’ve tried the other way for 20 years

Well, if you think about it we've also tried the draft/lottery route for the past several years too.
and have the Porzingis assets, RJ, IQ, Mitch and Obi to show for it with Knox/Frank being whiffs. I would say we are on the right path here.

The key is to add impact talent this year in FA. That is what allows you to keep all these picks and hopefully draft a project or two. I mean what if we draft Shariff Cooper at 21, let him run the G league team and it turns out he develops a nice stroke and is the next Isaiah Thomas... you know the healthy one.

Not saying the above will happen but at least I feel like we are playing that game (if they deem it worthy of spending the asset/pick on)

Its funny you mention Shariffe Cooper. I have watched him play at least 5 times during the season and have been watching a ton of video on him over the last week. I love his game! His vision. amd cout awareness is elite. Best passing pg to come out of college in a long time. He is impossible to keep out of the paint because of his quickness, and he draws a ton of fouls. He shoots above 80% from the line which is encouraging considering his poor 3 pt %. I think his shot can be fixed ( he has a slow release and leans back on the jumper). Unfortunately his height can't be fixed. He would be targeted on defense. Sheriffe is a baller, though and Im torn on him.


Write up sounds great. With three essentially first round picks we can take a risk.

I think it's imperative we get some guys with a killer instinct, the right amount of swagger. A bit worried about Randle providing the alpha

and we need a real pg. needed for Obi, KK if we're ever considering him. Bullock

we need a playmaker

(5)(7)
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

6/23/2021  7:46 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/23/2021  8:04 PM
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Those teams got lucky and picked high in the right drafts. Mikal Bridges is the only miss we really had, Its not like we could of had Ayton or Young

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Nalod
Posts: 71102
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/23/2021  10:26 PM
Few years ago were were ragging on them that they had bad ownership and futile to keep drafting. Oh how we forget.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/23/2021  10:54 PM
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Those teams got lucky and picked high in the right drafts. Mikal Bridges is the only miss we really had, Its not like we could of had Ayton or Young

Yeah we could have

Think about it, we had the 3rd pick (RJ) plus multiple future 1st rnd draft picks to move up one spot to take Ja..a position in need for 30 yrs

We had cap space to absorb CPs contract if we were aggressive, instead we resigned Payton

We drafted kp and Booker was 10 spots later.

we drafted OBI instead of Haliburton even though every mock draft had us taken him or killian hayes

We drafted Knox when bridges was they guy

Frank instead of Mitchell

The Knicks FO have been almost petrified to gamble or take Risk since walsh left. They have been super conservative and have not drafted well, just OK.

The don't draft well to be gun ho about up incoming drafts

ES
foosballnick
Posts: 21529
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

6/24/2021  6:53 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Those teams got lucky and picked high in the right drafts. Mikal Bridges is the only miss we really had, Its not like we could of had Ayton or Young

Yeah we could have

Think about it, we had the 3rd pick (RJ) plus multiple future 1st rnd draft picks to move up one spot to take Ja..a position in need for 30 yrs

We had cap space to absorb CPs contract if we were aggressive, instead we resigned Payton

We drafted kp and Booker was 10 spots later.

we drafted OBI instead of Haliburton even though every mock draft had us taken him or killian hayes

We drafted Knox when bridges was they guy

Frank instead of Mitchell

The Knicks FO have been almost petrified to gamble or take Risk since walsh left. They have been super conservative and have not drafted well, just OK.

The don't draft well to be gun ho about up incoming drafts


This response is a mess.

Morant was not a draft night "miss" he was picked ahead of us which is the opposite of a "miss". There is no way to know if Memphis was even willing to move the pick or an offer was made or not.

CP was a FA and has nothing to do with a draft night miss.

KP was the correct choice at the time. Booker is better but you are reaching here. Definition really is taking a useleas player instead of someone who becomes very good to great.

Obi, Haliburton, Hayes - an intellectually honest person would know it is too soon to tell.

Bridges was mentioned in the post you responded to, are you being repetitive for effect?

Mitchell is the only one you got, and that was 2 front offices ago under Phil.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/24/2021  7:44 AM
foosballnick wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Those teams got lucky and picked high in the right drafts. Mikal Bridges is the only miss we really had, Its not like we could of had Ayton or Young

Yeah we could have

Think about it, we had the 3rd pick (RJ) plus multiple future 1st rnd draft picks to move up one spot to take Ja..a position in need for 30 yrs

We had cap space to absorb CPs contract if we were aggressive, instead we resigned Payton

We drafted kp and Booker was 10 spots later.

we drafted OBI instead of Haliburton even though every mock draft had us taken him or killian hayes

We drafted Knox when bridges was they guy

Frank instead of Mitchell

The Knicks FO have been almost petrified to gamble or take Risk since walsh left. They have been super conservative and have not drafted well, just OK.

The don't draft well to be gun ho about up incoming drafts


This response is a mess.

Morant was not a draft night "miss" he was picked ahead of us which is the opposite of a "miss". There is no way to know if Memphis was even willing to move the pick or an offer was made or not.

CP was a FA and has nothing to do with a draft night miss.

KP was the correct choice at the time. Booker is better but you are reaching here. Definition really is taking a useleas player instead of someone who becomes very good to great.

Obi, Haliburton, Hayes - an intellectually honest person would know it is too soon to tell.

Bridges was mentioned in the post you responded to, are you being repetitive for effect?

Mitchell is the only one you got, and that was 2 front offices ago under Phil.

My point was not about us missing anything or anyone, it's more about not going aggressively after a player like Ja or whoever.

They have been very passive when it comes to getting the right PG, and it's been the biggest need for this franchise for how many yrs..

phil was ready to trade KP little after he got him, and it's no secrete MILL was a conservative an in experience.

The past moves have gotten 2 presidents fired and several coaches, so clearly the moves could have been done better.

Same for the suns past FO regimes, but it is what it is, learn the from mistakes of others and learn the good things that others do to succeed.

BTW I like RJ, best pick since EWING, but i liked Ja better.

ES
Nalod
Posts: 71102
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/24/2021  7:59 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Jmpasq wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:They drafted a great center
They drafted great wing players
They moved on chris paul
To pull it all together

And same with Atlanta. These teams were durable with younger players

We have 3 picks in a good draft — I hope we don’t try to short the process again.
Keep cap space open for right player. Keep acquiring and cultivating younger guys for long tern

Those teams got lucky and picked high in the right drafts. Mikal Bridges is the only miss we really had, Its not like we could of had Ayton or Young

Yeah we could have

Think about it, we had the 3rd pick (RJ) plus multiple future 1st rnd draft picks to move up one spot to take Ja..a position in need for 30 yrs

We had cap space to absorb CPs contract if we were aggressive, instead we resigned Payton

We drafted kp and Booker was 10 spots later.

we drafted OBI instead of Haliburton even though every mock draft had us taken him or killian hayes

We drafted Knox when bridges was they guy

Frank instead of Mitchell

The Knicks FO have been almost petrified to gamble or take Risk since walsh left. They have been super conservative and have not drafted well, just OK.

The don't draft well to be gun ho about up incoming drafts


This response is a mess.

Morant was not a draft night "miss" he was picked ahead of us which is the opposite of a "miss". There is no way to know if Memphis was even willing to move the pick or an offer was made or not.

CP was a FA and has nothing to do with a draft night miss.

KP was the correct choice at the time. Booker is better but you are reaching here. Definition really is taking a useleas player instead of someone who becomes very good to great.

Obi, Haliburton, Hayes - an intellectually honest person would know it is too soon to tell.

Bridges was mentioned in the post you responded to, are you being repetitive for effect?

Mitchell is the only one you got, and that was 2 front offices ago under Phil.

My point was not about us missing anything or anyone, it's more about not going aggressively after a player like Ja or whoever.

They have been very passive when it comes to getting the right PG, and it's been the biggest need for this franchise for how many yrs..

phil was ready to trade KP little after he got him, and it's no secrete MILL was a conservative an in experience.

The past moves have gotten 2 presidents fired and several coaches, so clearly the moves could have been done better.

Same for the suns past FO regimes, but it is what it is, learn the from mistakes of others and learn the good things that others do to succeed.

BTW I like RJ, best pick since EWING, but i liked Ja better.

YOu assume JA was available with no basis of fact
“Learn from past mistakes” but you fail to understand the principles in what you deem failure no longer are employed. You say “Conservative”? Taking young guys is hardly that.
Mitchell was picked 14th. Knicks not the only team that “Missed”.
You make no point. Leon and company are not looking at the past. they are looking at this draft, this roster and this coach. Not thinking about Channing Frye (Deemed a safe pick) or Jordan Hill.
And please, not the “GSW TOOK CURRY BECUASE DONNIE WANTEDD HIM” fable. If you know for a fact Donnie tried or not to move up to get him please reference it. Sometimes the price is not reasonable and Steph was not projected to be a HOF MVP or he would have went higher!

xavier
Posts: 20310
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/19/2021
Member: #8938
Croatia
6/24/2021  8:05 AM
Morant was never available to us. The whole time he was Griezzlies’ first choice and in a way it was “easier” for them to have a second pick and not have to choose between him and Zion (ok, this part is of course exaggerated because everyone wanted Zion but I want to say they wouldn’t trade him for the 3rd pick "and something else on the side").
Phoenix. Young and loaded with their own draft picks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy