[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If rumors are true and we decide to make a move for Beal...
Author Thread
jskinny35
Posts: 21580
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
2/11/2021  5:28 PM
Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76113
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/11/2021  5:44 PM
jskinny35 wrote:Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

So question: Is it not a sideways deal that doesn't really get you better when you trade your best player AND picks and other assets?

What is this deal really getting you? Beal is regarded as better than Julius but is older, cost more.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
jskinny35
Posts: 21580
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
2/11/2021  7:01 PM
Martin - I would keep Randle before trading him for Beal if it were up to me - not seeking a deal for Beal at all... my question was if Rose/management decides to trade for Beal (which has been rumored) - what would people be willing to give up? I don't want to trade 4 1st rounders so there would need to be some player value going back. In that situation I would part with Randle as it's probably him or RJ + Mitch in any deal for Beal. They may want RJ and Randle and I'd go nuts if they made that deal!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/11/2021  7:08 PM
jskinny35 wrote:Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

I think the Knicks got lucky w Randle. I wouldn’t trade him.

RIP Crushalot😞
dwiley20
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2014
Member: #5755

2/11/2021  7:42 PM
You can't go for beal n trade Randle. You looking to add a piece to what's been working. We need Victor Oladipo that's the missing piece....
mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
2/11/2021  7:45 PM
WOW for once I agree with Briggs??? We were lucky with Randle and now we are going to trade him away? I don't get it?
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

2/11/2021  7:57 PM
Don't trade for anyone. Keep trying to get better through the draft. If someone wants to sign as a FA fine. The more picks the more chances to build depth
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27480
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/11/2021  8:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/11/2021  8:05 PM
martin wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

So question: Is it not a sideways deal that doesn't really get you better when you trade your best player AND picks and other assets?

What is this deal really getting you? Beal is regarded as better than Julius but is older, cost more.

At the beginning of season, I would have pulled the trigger on a Beal for Randle Barrett and picks trade. Now, I might be willing to include Barrett, but even then, I am kind of curious to see how these guys develop. See, with our cap space and core, not sure we need to do a ton to bring in a superstar.

In the offseason, I’d say that all options are on the table, but I am just as interested in adding our draft picks as trading for a star.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

2/11/2021  8:07 PM
If we have to give up more than Knox and a first round pick, not interested. I would actually rather wait and sign LaVine as a free agent than give up anything to get Beal.
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

2/11/2021  8:10 PM
mikesknicks wrote:WOW for once I agree with Briggs??? We were lucky with Randle and now we are going to trade him away? I don't get it?
Were we "lucky" with Randle or did someone see his potential and envisioned what we're getting so far this season? Not sure why anything positive that happens with the Knicks has to always be luck.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30107
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
2/11/2021  8:40 PM
martin wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

So question: Is it not a sideways deal that doesn't really get you better when you trade your best player AND picks and other assets?

What is this deal really getting you? Beal is regarded as better than Julius but is older, cost more.

Trading for Beal mostly makes sense if the goal is to form a big 3 with Beal, RJ & Randle.

Odds are Quickley would have to be moved if that was the case though. Paired with all the picks from this draft, and Mitch as they would feel he is a piece they could flip again by the offseason while he fills the void for Bryant.

If Knicks do pull the trigger on a deal like that. Bledsoe is also available from the Pelicans and would probably be worth targeting.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Nalod
Posts: 71113
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/11/2021  9:19 PM
Lavine A free agent in ‘22. Bulls want something in return or extend him this summer?
Maybe he wants to test FA?
Beal in a trade? Might want to look at what Paul george cost.
Nalod gets trades will accelerate the process but really I don’t go down this path getting mad about values of what I’d pay or not.
Teams that win big have to build a base thru the draft and cultivate that talent to make trades and then leverage future picks to complete them. When do you do that?

Lakers:
Base of Randle, Ingram, Ball and Kuzma
Flip Russell for Bropez, create cap space.
Lakers looked stupid.
Then used that cap to sign Lebron. No stupid.
Lebron has one bad season, haters rejoice. He and Lakers look stupid.
Use assets to get AD.
Whose stupid now?

Clippers over pay For PG13 but get Kawahi.
Jury still out on that one.

Remember when we lost to the “Lowly Kings”. LIke wall all that, right? YEah, they red hot now. Shyt changes.
Team build thru draft after years of stupidity.
ATL looks like they getting closer.
Miami might have been a fluke last year, but they still good.
Takes time. Patience. We like 26 games into this season and fans can’t see it. Its because the future is unknown.
Enjoy the trip.

mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
2/11/2021  10:02 PM
Were we "lucky" with Randle or did someone see his potential and envisioned what we're getting so far this season? Not sure why anything positive that happens with the Knicks has to always be luck

I say we were lucky because we had the option to sign a player coming off a career year because the player is normally resigned. Also, he was the number 2 pick traded for a superstar just the season before and is still only 26. All of these things normally don't happen in our favor.
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
joec32033
Posts: 30606
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/11/2021  11:39 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:
martin wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:Not advocating in any way as I think Lavine, Booker and other younger shooting guards would be the way to go... but it seems like Beal and Oladipo are possible targets (eg Berman) as we approach the deadline. I'm curious what others think is Beal's value and what we should realistically give up for him (provided we do end of trading for him)?

To me, he's not worth that much as he's already 27, a little smallish and is already limited by minutes due to injury/knee history. Get that he's a great outside shooter but when I hear people saying Harden like value (3 or 4 1st round picks) - that seems crazy to me.

If we are trading for Beal - I'd say Randle, Frank, Knox, Payton and 2 1st rd picks (1 Dallas) for Beal and Ish Smith would be my limit. (They may laugh but that's as far as I would go if we are certain to trade for Beal)

So question: Is it not a sideways deal that doesn't really get you better when you trade your best player AND picks and other assets?

What is this deal really getting you? Beal is regarded as better than Julius but is older, cost more.

Trading for Beal mostly makes sense if the goal is to form a big 3 with Beal, RJ & Randle.

Odds are Quickley would have to be moved if that was the case though. Paired with all the picks from this draft, and Mitch as they would feel he is a piece they could flip again by the offseason while he fills the void for Bryant.

If Knicks do pull the trigger on a deal like that. Bledsoe is also available from the Pelicans and would probably be worth targeting.

I agree dealing Beal for Randle is a sideways deal. As is dealing him for for a ridiculous package of young guys and picks. To me, RJ, Randle (unless it is for a markedly better frontcourt player), Quickley, and possibly even Mitch should be off limits.

I think trading for upper echelon stars, unless they force their way here to the Knicks benefit should be avoided. Now, trading for younger guys with room for growth who have an established floor that fill holes (Buddy Heild, Gary Trent, Mikal Bridges, Wil Barton, Porter, Gary Harris, Lonnie Walker, Malik Beasley-depending on his criminal stuff) should be guys we are willing to pay for.

Vets like Reddick, should be got by either buyout market or by top 45 protected 2nd rounders.

Full disclosure, I would trade Randle for an established young building block who I view as more stable then him. I still have my doubts on how sustainable his play is after he signs a big contract.

~You can't run from who you are.~
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

2/11/2021  11:49 PM
mikesknicks wrote:
Were we "lucky" with Randle or did someone see his potential and envisioned what we're getting so far this season? Not sure why anything positive that happens with the Knicks has to always be luck

I say we were lucky because we had the option to sign a player coming off a career year because the player is normally resigned. Also, he was the number 2 pick traded for a superstar just the season before and is still only 26. All of these things normally don't happen in our favor.
You really think with Zion coming that they considered for one second resigning Randle? Randle was always the plan B if we couldn't sign Durant or any other top tier free agent. No, it wasn't luck. We offered him more money than he was likely to get elsewhere and the Pelicans weren't going to resign him when they got the 1st pick in the draft who was an upgraded version of Randle playing the same position. Plus I'm sure Fiz sold him on being the man here.

Not understanding how Randle having a career year before free agency is luck? Don't most players have big years prior to free agency? This is just a matter of people not thinking anything good that happens to the Knicks could possibly be due to us making a sound decision.

doomed
Posts: 20230
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2006
Member: #1078
USA
2/12/2021  12:20 AM
mikesknicks wrote:WOW for once I agree with Briggs??? We were lucky with Randle and now we are going to trade him away? I don't get it?

Same here. Don’t trade Randle. Dude is a terrific offensive player. Not a bad defender anymore either.

TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/12/2021  4:51 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/12/2021  4:52 AM
I like Beal, but I think we should stay the course and pass on him. Any package involving Beal is going to cost too many players and draft picks for it to be worth it. I would see how we do this year, hope we get some luck in the draft, and then look to make a move next year. Our priority this year should just be development and figuring out a trade for Knox and possibly Frank. I would like to see them package Payton and Knox for someone or maybe another first round pick.
Trust the Process
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27480
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/12/2021  8:12 AM
TheGame wrote:I like Beal, but I think we should stay the course and pass on him. Any package involving Beal is going to cost too many players and draft picks for it to be worth it. I would see how we do this year, hope we get some luck in the draft, and then look to make a move next year. Our priority this year should just be development and figuring out a trade for Knox and possibly Frank. I would like to see them package Payton and Knox for someone or maybe another first round pick.

I am here. Though I am not even really giving up on Knox. Just giving him a bit more time.

You know I gonna spin wit it
xblvdels3
Posts: 20736
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/31/2020
Member: #8868

2/12/2021  9:21 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/12/2021  9:29 AM
we can get Beal and trade away everyone and all our picks so we can have a guy score 30 a game and we become the wizards.


People don’t understand team building. Some just know oooh that guy is flashy and can score.


Yes at some point in time in team building you can do what the nets did but we are not quite at that point yet!!


Why isn’t Beal transforming the wizards? once we give them all or so so talent is our team better than their team?

We will effectively be the wizards if you make that trade and have 5 wins


If you believe Beal is so magical go be a wizards fan and enjoy 😊

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/12/2021  10:41 AM
Welpee wrote:
mikesknicks wrote:WOW for once I agree with Briggs??? We were lucky with Randle and now we are going to trade him away? I don't get it?
Were we "lucky" with Randle or did someone see his potential and envisioned what we're getting so far this season? Not sure why anything positive that happens with the Knicks has to always be luck.

Go look at his stats, he was getting better every single season until Fizdale got a hold of him.

ES
If rumors are true and we decide to make a move for Beal...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy