dacash wrote:Let's say we the 8 and 15th pick in the draft.
Would u guys package the 15th and both second rounders and a pick in a later years plus salary for filler for for Zach levine and try to getv a good point with the 8th pick?
Or do u think that IQ is the starter.

I don't think thats enough for Zach but i think IQ is a starter. Obviously Thibs loves him. If we get 8 and 15 i bet we need both picks plus the future Dallas pick to even get into the conversation. And probably more after that. I would rather use 8 and 15 to move up a couple spots to get a player we really want, if the opportunity presents itself. Maybe 8 and 15 to get up to 5-6 range for Kuminga or Ziaire Williams, both of which would be good future SF. Get someone like Porter as a stopgap SF.

fishmike wrote:

dacash wrote:Let's say we the 8 and 15th pick in the draft.
Would u guys package the 15th and both second rounders and a pick in a later years plus salary for filler for for Zach levine and try to getv a good point with the 8th pick?
Or do u think that IQ is the starter.

he's 25 putting up 27/5/5

You arent getting him for pick 15 and filler.

More like both your lottery picks + Obi/Knox and if I am Chi I an not listening really hard to anything that doesnt have RJ or IQ in it.

Chi needs parts. Why are they handing us Zach Levine (bad D and all) for spare change?

My thoughts exactly. We would have to trade all the picks and a good young player most likely.

That ship has long sailed

To be competitive, you need to maximize the minute player in term of Player Efficiency and more specifically, eFG.

I’m not in a “rush” to trade draft picks, but at some point the Knicks will need to consolidate into two more starting level players. Maybe three.