Yes it would undermine Thibs authority. But you gotta sacrifice something.

ramtour420 wrote:I'll start with retaining Miller in some capacity. Should have kept him as an assistant. Tell Thibs to suck it up and at least Miller would have told Thibs to play Frank.

Yes it would undermine Thibs authority. But you gotta sacrifice something.

So Mike Miller should have been retained so that Frank could get more minutes?? That type of reasoning was the purpose of this thread, no?

Uptown wrote:

ramtour420 wrote:I'll start with retaining Miller in some capacity. Should have kept him as an assistant. Tell Thibs to suck it up and at least Miller would have told Thibs to play Frank.

Yes it would undermine Thibs authority. But you gotta sacrifice something.

So Mike Miller should have been retained so that Frank could get more minutes?? That type of reasoning was the purpose of this thread, no?

The reason why I wanted Miller retained is because we were playing better with him at the end of the year. As a rebuilding team you need continuity. You need to try to squeeze every bit of value out of the players we have.

Thibs may be a better coach. I posted this because the FO went ahead and did something that I don't agree with. I might not cry about it all season but might as well make the most of this thread.

ekstarks94 wrote:

ramtour420 wrote:

Uptown wrote:

ramtour420 wrote:I'll start with retaining Miller in some capacity. Should have kept him as an assistant. Tell Thibs to suck it up and at least Miller would have told Thibs to play Frank.

Yes it would undermine Thibs authority. But you gotta sacrifice something.

So Mike Miller should have been retained so that Frank could get more minutes?? That type of reasoning was the purpose of this thread, no?

The reason why I wanted Miller retained is because we were playing better with him at the end of the year. As a rebuilding team you need continuity. You need to try to squeeze every bit of value out of the players we have.

Thibs may be a better coach. I posted this because the FO went ahead and did something that I don't agree with. I might not cry about it all season but might as well make the most of this thread.

Look Mike Miller may have had a chance if Perry remained in charge..a new FO is going to ride with their guy and not a prior regime 1st yr coach a year out of 5he G league....Thibs is light...I mean light years better than Miller for now and where we ultimately end up where we want to go...that man has forgotten more basketball than Miller, Fiz, and Horny combined....however he is no miracle worker by any stretch....the roster is devoid of real solid bedrock talent not thru any fault of his...free agency has been a $hit$how...and internal development did not exist....excluding this draft we have 4 players that have been in the top 10 in the past 3 drafts....with the exception of RJ..they are either unplayable or 2-3 yrs later we are still talking about seeing “flashes”...look at any other team and even their misses are better than ours

Look Thibs was brought in to separate the wheat from the chafe....and he is going to do exactly that...Miller...Fiz...Hirny...Fish...could not do that...

Our draft talent base starts from RJ and Mitch....everyone else aside from this draft is suspect...

I will agree that Thibs is a better coach.