[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Jrue Holiday made available
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30111
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
11/4/2020  12:46 PM
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/jrue-holiday-trade-rumors-pelicans-make-star-guard-available-several-contending-teams-showing-interest/amp/

Would be perfect next to RJ.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
AUTOADVERT
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39844
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
11/4/2020  12:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2020  12:57 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/jrue-holiday-trade-rumors-pelicans-make-star-guard-available-several-contending-teams-showing-interest/amp/

Would be perfect next to RJ.

The Knicks would have to give up some real assets for him. One each of the Clippers and Mavs picks and Randle maybe? What is your limit?

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
11/4/2020  1:01 PM
He went from underrated to overrated- Don't think we're the right fit for him. He's best suited for a contending team at this point.
TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/4/2020  1:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2020  1:14 PM
It depends on what we have to give up. If they would take Knox, DSJr, and The Clippers pick and our second round pick, then I would do it. Anything more than that and I would pass. He is only a so so shooter, so I don’t think he is the best fit next to RJ. He would definitely be an improvement and is probably better than VanFleet as an overall player, but VanFleet is probably a better fit for what we need.
Trust the Process
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/4/2020  2:01 PM
Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

ES
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/4/2020  2:13 PM
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle is 100% not low-value. That’s why you trade now. Not everyone is so quick to give up on Knox. I am one of them. I agree that selling DSJ while his value is low is not always the smart move but if you can get something back then gangbusters.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39844
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
11/4/2020  2:19 PM
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle's name is gonna be thrown out there in most scenarios because of salary match. I don't giving up low performing young players will get it done for Holiday. NOP will want picks.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76173
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/4/2020  2:28 PM
NOP not trading FOR Randle... they already had him and let him walk for NOTHING
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39844
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
11/4/2020  2:38 PM
martin wrote:NOP not trading FOR Randle... they already had him and let him walk for NOTHING

Forgot about that. Makes a trade that much more unlikely. Best case scenario is that we act as a salary shelter in a three-way trade. Maybe the Clips get involved and we find a way to reel in Landry Shamet.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76173
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/4/2020  2:49 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
martin wrote:NOP not trading FOR Randle... they already had him and let him walk for NOTHING

Forgot about that. Makes a trade that much more unlikely. Best case scenario is that we act as a salary shelter in a three-way trade. Maybe the Clips get involved and we find a way to reel in Landry Shamet.

Yes

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053
11/4/2020  2:51 PM
Well there goes the slimmest of chances to steal BI. I prefer this than some hope BS
The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30111
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
11/4/2020  3:15 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/jrue-holiday-trade-rumors-pelicans-make-star-guard-available-several-contending-teams-showing-interest/amp/

Would be perfect next to RJ.

The Knicks would have to give up some real assets for him. One each of the Clippers and Mavs picks and Randle maybe? What is your limit?

I honestly don't know what N.O is looking for. Odds are they would want to add a stud next to Zion-Ingram-Ball trio. They could also attempt to go nuts and look to package Holiday with the #13 for an upgrade. Our best shot imo would be if say Wiseman was to fall to #8 which many mock drafts have been having happen. Then using Wiseman & Knox for #13 & Holiday. They would probably look for a swap of #27 for #38 as well.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/4/2020  3:24 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle's name is gonna be thrown out there in most scenarios because of salary match. I don't giving up low performing young players will get it done for Holiday. NOP will want picks.

I HONSTLY feel the knicks will focus on CP especially since his recent request is either to the Lerbon lakers or leons knicks

ES
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39844
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
11/4/2020  3:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2020  3:32 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle's name is gonna be thrown out there in most scenarios because of salary match. I don't giving up low performing young players will get it done for Holiday. NOP will want picks.

I HONSTLY feel the knicks will focus on CP especially since his recent request is either to the Lerbon lakers or leons knicks


I don't see the Lakers being able to offer anything OKC would need. Maybe the Clippers, but I have little knowledge of their cap situation. I just know that they'll be limited in what they can do with their picks for the time being. Would Brooklyn be willing to give Dinwiddie and picks? Would OKC even want Dinwiddie? We have to be OKC's first choice, assuming no other suitors jump into the fray. That means the Knicks front office has some rope and it doesn't have to be pressured into whatever deal OKC has on the table.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/14/2015
Member: #6064
11/5/2020  2:27 AM
There is a lot to like about Jrue Holiday or Buddy Hield. Scoring ability, shooting, passing, the stats are excellent. And they fit our development curve, i.e. in their prime or about to enter it. The big issue for me is that despite their excellence, their teams never win, and that is with some great or decent players on their teams (AD, Zion, Fox), so there is real risk that they will not make much impact in NY either, just pad the box score.

For a package of Randle plus Ntilikina/DSJr plus maybe the 27th pick, well, why not, at worst it would be a lateral move with some upside built in. But not something to mortgage our future on.
Philc1
Posts: 28328
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897
11/5/2020  4:30 AM
Pass unless it’s a salary dump and we don’t need to give assets for him. Otherwise simply draft the next Jrue Holiday at 8 Vassell
Philc1
Posts: 28328
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897
11/5/2020  4:31 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle's name is gonna be thrown out there in most scenarios because of salary match. I don't giving up low performing young players will get it done for Holiday. NOP will want picks.

I HONSTLY feel the knicks will focus on CP especially since his recent request is either to the Lerbon lakers or leons knicks

Because it’s a no brainer. Everyone focuses on the money ($80 million) but it’s the years(2) that is what is really important. Realistically knicks could get Paul for just Randle and Knox
shinmen
Posts: 20363
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
11/5/2020  5:58 AM
Philc1 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Its funny.. whenever there's a trade proposal, Knox, Randle and DSJ are the only names that knick homers are willing to toss in almost every trade.

Your bascially saying take our struggling low value players, and give us your best players + draft picks for taking back some salary, and we'll throw in a 2nd rnd pick...

Randle's name is gonna be thrown out there in most scenarios because of salary match. I don't giving up low performing young players will get it done for Holiday. NOP will want picks.

I HONSTLY feel the knicks will focus on CP especially since his recent request is either to the Lerbon lakers or leons knicks

Because it’s a no brainer. Everyone focuses on the money ($80 million) but it’s the years(2) that is what is really important. Realistically knicks could get Paul for just Randle and Knox


There is very little chance that he's the same positive player as he was last year with the Knicks(not the same supporting cast, probable injury). We can't pay for what was but for what may be. The fact is that Paul is 35 and owed 80 millions for 2 years with little chance to be the same player. OKC should compensate the team willing to take him, not the other way around.
technomaster
Posts: 23347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
11/5/2020  9:10 AM
Yeah, I kind of agree that Randle is NOT low value around the league. Other teams still see 20ppg/10rpg/3apg, can handle the ball a little and hit some 3s. (I guess the vision of him dribbling into traffic and coughing up the ball in the clutch is etched in our brains that we can't see his production holistically)
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/5/2020  10:12 AM
technomaster wrote:Yeah, I kind of agree that Randle is NOT low value around the league. Other teams still see 20ppg/10rpg/3apg, can handle the ball a little and hit some 3s. (I guess the vision of him dribbling into traffic and coughing up the ball in the clutch is etched in our brains that we can't see his production holistically)

Some fans want flawless players, some fans still don't realize we are not a popular destination so regardless of cap space, your not getting Gannis.

Jru is a solid player, but he doesn't have the leadership skills CP has.

ES
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Jrue Holiday made available
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy