Author | Thread |
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() Jordan Poole
Position: Point/Shooting Guard ▪ Shoots: Right Born: June 19, 1999 (age 21 years), Milwaukee, WI Height: 6′4″ Weight: 194 lbs Wingspan: 6’6.75 Standing Reach: 8'3.5 Vertical Max: 35.5 Inches NBA draft: 2019 28th Overall/1st Round School: University of Michigan Current team: Golden State Warriors (#3 / Point/Shooting Guard)
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-nba-player-projections/jordan-poole/ Wins above replacement projection
|
AUTOADVERT |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() TripleThreat wrote: how ya doin man? What can we give the gS warriors for almost any of their players TT? From the other side what r u going to take? RIP Crushalot😞
|
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() I have a little time since it's post Super Bowl.
I wanted the Knicks to trade for Jordan Poole right after his rookie year, which by all accounts, was pretty horrific. But I was interested in his ability to get to the rim. The belief back then was that the Warriors were in a much different asset position and trading off Poole might have been in keeping with the theory that they might sell him off before his stock tanked even further. He was a late first round pick so the level of compensation wouldn't have been as much, certainly not what they'd ask for today. Which goes back to what I've discussed in the past about the value of those rookie contracts, particularly with slotting at where Poole was drafted. That's really a very small amount of money for the potential for some impact. I recognize the Knicks could have traded for Poole and he could have tanked on them even further than he did for the Warriors. But he's a fearless player, certainly not a perfect one as I'm still not a fan of his shot selection and his efficiencies, and he can penetrate and get to the cup. That kind of player who would have opened up the offense for this team. Again,as I've said before, there's a reason why I tout the players that I do. |
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:
Please no one ask me about Zach Wilson and Brian Flores/Brian Daboll. It's too late to trade for Poole right now, his cost would be heavy and the Warriors wouldn't want to disrupt their chemistry this year as they are legitimate contenders. The reason I bumped a thread from two offseasons ago is to talk about trying to mine trades for young players who are struggling but still in their rookie contracts depending on their projectible skill set. Poole would be damn useful on this team right now. But the fair argument can be made if Poole would have developed like this outside of the Dubs system. While I'm not a huge believer in franchises magically being able to "develop" players past a certain threshold, I do believe certain roles players can be bloomed out based on some situations ( i.e. Duncan Robinson and Erik Spolestra in Miami) I'm guessing while I was gone for a while, there were some touts about trading for a guy like Russell Westbrook or something like that. And while our beloved Knicks should not be closed to any potential deals without deep examination, the real value is in situations like Poole, young guys who need playing time and can give you a long career window if they pan out. Plus trading for them implies getting the natural pathway towards their valuable Full Bird Rights. How have you been my old friend? How is your health? Let me ask you, does my sudden reappearance trigger more of your angst from jealousy? Or envy? LOL. I've missed you my old friend. I've been OK. Between heavy bouts of film study on prospects, I've found time to rail a bunch of out of work by the pandemic Zumba instructors with predictably low self esteem but high narcissism that desperately wanted to get pounded. So I obliged them. Conversation is overrated with the typical yoga pants hunnies. Everyone looks the same bent over a pool table. |
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() TripleThreat wrote:BRIGGS wrote: But do they all make the same noises? Just asking, since I have no frame of reference with hunnies bent over pool tables. And not for nothing, but don't we already have rookies with projectible skill sets that aren't being developed? What's the logic in trading for more of them? Just asking, as I haven't been watching film, just lots of bad highlights of Thibs riding really old people with the same results over and over again. |
Nalod
Posts: 71086 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() jrodmc wrote:TripleThreat wrote:BRIGGS wrote:
|
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() jrodmc wrote: My pathway that I discussed in the offseason was 1) Use Randle's option year and observe him. Some here said it would make the situation more expensive, i.e. the difference between a max deal at full Bird Rights versus Early Bird Rights. I still said wait and observe him. His production rate was likely to fall in the middle of his first Knicks year and his 2nd Knicks year 2) Rent out the cap space, the Knicks had the most in the league. Eat a big bad contract and take in draft picks and hopefully some young players to do it. Take in a John Wall or a Davis Bertans or something as such and only do it if draft picks were coming to the team for it. I pointed out Brock Aller was doing pretty good managing the total asset base and more picks just opens up way more options for the team 3) I pointed out the draft targets, well the guys I liked, were Moses Moody, Johnny Juzang, Aaron Henry, Julian Champagnie, Kessler Edwards and Josh Primo. I wasn't sure Moody would fall that far, I doubted it, but I wanted him given where the Knicks were actually picking. I wanted Primo as I thought he would fall that far and no one could predict the Spurs would take him so early. 4) I discussed the dangers of "Middle Class Contracts" i.e. situations like Courtney Lee. Guys who ate up a good chunk of cap but weren't good trade fodder and got in the way of younger players getting minutes. I used the MCC argument to advise Briggs that overpaying Cameron Payne was not a great long term idea for this team. The Knicks would have been better off trading for a big bad contract and taking in picks to do it. I know that would suck for many people who wanted Lonzo Ball or some other free agent but I didn't see those guys coming to the Knicks. That one bad contract chews up free cap but also frees up roster spots. One massively overpaid guy like Wall is one roster spot. Combining Noel, Fournier and Walker is three roster spots. Under my view, then the Knicks could have no MCC type veterans, just barely good enough to start and making too much money to bench, but not good enough to give the team a real future, and then just play their rookies. I'm NOT a huge Obi Toppin fan, but I do believe since he's here, give him some good minutes and see what you do have. It's not just cap dollars that are valuable, it's the opportunity cost revolving around roster spots and minutes. Everyone who has seen me post for years know the drill from me - Get young cost controlled jumbo wings who can defend and switch and are fundamental. Then hope their offense picks up some. I also wanted Kenny Atkinson over any other coaching candidate before Thibs was hired. I wanted a guy who had a reputation for helping to develop younger players. The Knicks should always be open to bringing in talent period. You can never have too much talent, as long as it's the best resource management decision given the time and place. At the time I started this thread, it was 10/2020, this was the end of Poole's first disaster laden year in the league. It was really ugly. I wanted a young cheap guy who could play the point and get to the rim. And at the time, the Dubs might have been willing to dump him and at the time the Knicks young talent situation was a lot worse than today. Knicks did exactly what I said NOT to do with Middle Class Contracts. And it ****ed them. The salary system was designed for max contracts to real franchise players and filling the rest of the ranks with value pickups in the back end of free agency and young players on their rookie deals. The current Warriors are more of that archetype. I recognize Green has declined a bit but he's still a core of that team and no one could predict Thompson would get hurt. But that team is filled with high upside rookie contracts ( Moody, Kuminga, Poole, Wiseman) and veteran bargains ( Porter, Bjelica, Payton II, Toscano Anderson) around their highly paid core. You can argue Wiggins is overpaid but the principles in place are there. Fournier is a problem. He's on the high end of a MCC, he's not that great of a defender, he's streaky as a shooter, he's not really your prototype 3 And D wing, he's going to be hard to trade, he has a long time left on his contract and he's blocking younger players from valuable minutes. If you are going to have a bad contract, then you are better off having one big ass single bad contract. Not 3-4 medium range bad contracts. People think smaller bad contracts make them "easier to move" but it's not exactly that easy to move those guys. Usually "easier to move" means bleeding out lost value somewhere else in multiple deals what are spread out. Long story short, the Knicks should listen to me. They should have listened to me like a decade ago, the team would be in a better place for it. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() Evan’s contract isn’t even that bad. Since the new year he’s been shooting 40+% while averaging decent numbers. This teams problem is it’s ****ty construction with no real PG.
The Future is Bright!
|
Caseloads
Posts: 27725 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/29/2001 Member: #41 |
![]() Jordan Poole is great in the GSW system. He's the third splash brother. He's not a PG. He's great with Steph drawing all the attention.
|
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
![]() Caseloads wrote:Jordan Poole is great in the GSW system. He's the third splash brother. He's not a PG. He's great with Steph drawing all the attention.
2022-23:$3,901,399
IMHO, Poole is still a viable trade target. He can help this team, he can get to the rim, he's going to get some playoff experience, he's had exposure to a stable winning team and maybe can bring some of that to rub off on the Knicks young players. He's not flawless, thus that's why he'd be available, but he would be an instant starter on the Knicks. Be nice to have a guy dedicated to moving off the ball relentlessly and can occasionally create his own shot. And any trade would also garner his valuable full Bird Rights. |
ramtour420
Posts: 26255 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 3/19/2007 Member: #1388 Russian Federation |
![]() Yes!!! Do eet, if he can dribble and pass the rock and is a PG i am sold.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
|
martin
Posts: 76032 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Speaking of Poole
As general manager Bob Myers stares down a ballooning payroll, he must make tough decisions over the next 16 months. Perhaps none will be more difficult than what to do with Wiggins. He has blossomed into a fan favorite, a natural fit in the Warriors’ locker room and one of the league’s best two-way players, which is why he’s on pace to sign another maximum contract when he hits free agency in summer 2023. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|