[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What Rumored/Assumed Option do you think makes most sense?


Author Poll
Knixkik
Posts: 15445
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
I see us making one big move this off-season. Based on general rumors/conversations, pick the off-season move you can get behind the most:
Trade for Chris Paul while sacrificing 1 first round pick (Dallas or LAC) or 2 second rounders
Trade for Buddy Hield (Let's say Randle, DSjr, and either a future first (Dallas or LAC) or 2 second rounders
Sign VanVleet for 4 years at a starting salary of 20 mil
Sign Gallinari for a Randle-type contract (20 mil a year for 2 years, 3rd year team option/partial guarantee)
Trade this year's lottery pick and a future first rounder (1 Dallas pick) for LaVine
None of the above
View Results


Author Thread
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/14/2015
Member: #6064

8/18/2020  12:45 PM
I do not see any of the above trades as putting us on a path to building a contender. A trade for Buddy comes closest to such a description, but then Sancto has done nothing with him and Fox, so why would it be any different here with RJ?

At this point, I feel that patience is our best strategy. Pick wisely in the draft, develop the youth that you have or are about to add, improve organically, and keep picks + caproom just in case there is an opportunity to trade for a generational player.

AUTOADVERT
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27500
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/18/2020  12:52 PM
I voted for Hield. Comes with baggage, but I don’t see the Knicks acquiring a shooter as easily. Barrett and Hield should be able to co-exist given Barrett’s ability to handle the ball. Both need work defensively though. The 27 pick year could be given away without much tear shed. It would be a budget neutral move and would open up the PF position for a Christian Wood or other Free Agent. Barrett could also slide to SF if you ran Halliburton Hield Barret Wood Robinson. Would be a lot better floor spacing than last year, giving Barrett more room to work.
You know I gonna spin wit it
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/18/2020  1:05 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:I voted for Hield. Comes with baggage, but I don’t see the Knicks acquiring a shooter as easily. Barrett and Hield should be able to co-exist given Barrett’s ability to handle the ball. Both need work defensively though. The 27 pick year could be given away without much tear shed. It would be a budget neutral move and would open up the PF position for a Christian Wood or other Free Agent. Barrett could also slide to SF if you ran Halliburton Hield Barret Wood Robinson. Would be a lot better floor spacing than last year, giving Barrett more room to work.

I'm interested in Hield, but his defense must be a complete abomination if he's getting benched with that great offense.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/18/2020  1:08 PM
Do not trade the Mavs 2021 pick- they could miss the playoffs if KP on Doncic gets injured or the season is disrupted. Even if they don't you could combine their pick in the 2021 draft with ours to trade up. I'd rather trade up in the 2021 draft than this one.

I'm hopeful all the player development hirings mean we've changed course and aren't going for a quick rebuild (so no CP3 and Melo) due to the covid situation. Next season is perfect time to tank with no ticket sales to worry about and a good draft at the end of it

IdreamofEwing
Posts: 20005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/18/2020
Member: #8855

8/18/2020  1:10 PM
VanVleet is a starting point(literally and figuratively) but not for $20 mil. If we had a 0.500 team then I would be all over this.
Grant/VanVleet would be nice but if we're going to use a lotto pick or shell out that kinda cap cash it better be for the likes of D.Mitchell or Ingram.
Grant/Ingram or Grant/Donovan would be nice. Otherwise roll the dice on the draft, spend on short/tradeable contracts
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27500
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/18/2020  7:38 PM
smackeddog wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:I voted for Hield. Comes with baggage, but I don’t see the Knicks acquiring a shooter as easily. Barrett and Hield should be able to co-exist given Barrett’s ability to handle the ball. Both need work defensively though. The 27 pick year could be given away without much tear shed. It would be a budget neutral move and would open up the PF position for a Christian Wood or other Free Agent. Barrett could also slide to SF if you ran Halliburton Hield Barret Wood Robinson. Would be a lot better floor spacing than last year, giving Barrett more room to work.

I'm interested in Hield, but his defense must be a complete abomination if he's getting benched with that great offense.

From the outside looking in, seems like contract dispute and verbal jabbing with Vlade Divac really disrupted his season. Certainly needs work on defense, but again, shooters like that aren’t easy to come by. I’d make that deal with the Clippers pick and think we got a steal. Bet that the change of scenery fixes things. I mean, if Bradley Beal were available, I’d rather have Bradley Beal. But small steps can help grow the team.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Jimbo5
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2020
Member: #8854

8/18/2020  7:45 PM
Im ok with trading for an up and coming player with potential to be a superstar, with the development coaches hired, it could work. Im ok with Heild, Lavin, i also like Kelly Oubre Jr. if he mysteriously becomes available with the cost of 1 first rounder and duplicate players we have like Randle and DSJ. With this we can still sign a free agent like Bertans or Woods.

I wont want to give up anything more, we will be better off to stay in coarse and rebuild slowly and organically. By the way, i dont think the knicks will part with Randle or Knox anytime soon with the hiring of Payne. So i guess, we will be looking at a slow rebuild which i dont mind as long as there are concrete improvements year on year.

What Rumored/Assumed Option do you think makes most sense?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy