What an ***h0le.
Crawford made that statement twice in a 30-second span at media day yesterday, so it's obvious that he missed the news that the Knicks won only 39 times last season, finishing four games under .500.
so adding a guy who can score 40 points in agame won't lead to a few wins?
Thomas has been on board less than 10 months, but the payroll is now more than Scott Layden's. Eight of the Knicks' top 12 players are Thomas imports, with more on the way if he can rid the roster of Kurt Thomas and Shandon Anderson, who are proving to be more of a pain for the team's No.1 basketball executive than they've ever been to opponents.
??? way to use players Layden brought in to make IT look bad?
Thomas' one play for a front-court player wasn't even that creative or good. Knicks fans will be eternally grateful that Chris Mullin didn't cave in to Thomas' strong-arm tactics and send them Erick Dampier, a classic underachiever who would have heard boos in the Garden by Christmas.
who out there was much better than dampier? if you want to say it was a failure not to get him, then don't run down his game
Besides the obvious problems up front, who's to say that Allan Houston returns to form off his knee troubles? Who's to say that Crawford can accept coming off the bench?
maybe my favorite. problem 1- houston will be injured all season. problem 2- crawford won't like playing off of the bench. um, you can only have one of these problems, not both.
what a tool.