Nalod wrote: NFL should move the damn thing to New Zealand.
The NFL would have to pay to use their stadiums, if they are available at all for this kind of volume/attrition.
NFL games, if they are broadcast, have to do so in real time. I suppose if there are no fans, you could try to schedule games at odd hours, except you'd have to accommodate all teams, playing all week on different days. You can't have 5-6 different stadiums and expect to maintain security/logistics. Also field maintenance takes time. You can't have three NFL games in the same stadium on the same day and expect to maintain a field for safety.
Logistically, you need to move all players, coaches, and their support staff and families to another country. You can't have people shuttling back and forth, they would need to basically live there for a season. You are talking the kind of logistical bandwidth that only the US military could reasonably handle. We are talking about building a mini city off US soil.
Host countries are obligated for medical services, security and accommodation for dependents. This means critical emergency services, even if they are being paid by the NFL by proxy, are being moved from the people of New Zealand.
It's implied, based on precedent via international games, that your host country will get some broadcast rights. The agreement between the league and the networks don't cover this kind of volume. The suits would need to hammer that out and it would take forever.
Politically, New Zealand would be opening up to a massive COVID19 risk. Would you like it if your school did X amount of hard work to stay safe, then your kids show up one day and 600 new kids from outside your area just show up and expect to be integrated into those classes? NZ will always have the capability to revoke any and all visas at any time.
Playing in your empty US stadium lets you fulfill your existing contracts. Luxury suites. Ads around the stadium. Commercials. Etc. Playing in another country creates all kinds of legal/insurance problems. Force Majeure type contract provisions will typically cover inability to play period not playing in a different country. Long story short, you will give sponsors and so forth a legal leg to stand on to challenge to void their contracts with said NFL team. With massive amounts of revenue being lost, plenty of folks locked into contracts/deals with the NFL would jump at the chance to separate.
If you lose one team to a massive outbreak, then what happens to your schedule? Do you want to see a guy the size of Curtis Martin playing left tackle because no one is left? Or have Daniel Jones punting and place kicking out of attrition?
You are talking a total nightmare logistically, financially and politically.
The NFL's best chance is to build a mini city in the desert somewhere in America. The NBAs best chance is to retrofit a cruise liner.
Projected revenue losses for major American sports franchises is going to hover around 35-40 percent. This year alone. A team like the Knicks or Lakers can weather something like this for a while. The Atlanta Hawks?
I understand part of the sentiment outside of the money. This is like the movie Snowpiercer. If the train stops, if the perpetual motion stops, you derail the train and the sport dies.
To survive long term death of the sport, the idea of contraction starts to become very real.