Author | Thread |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() RIP Crushalot😞
|
AUTOADVERT |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() He's my number 2 after Ball
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() His proven game efficiency and 3 point shooting make him a better prospect than Ball
RIP Crushalot😞
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() RSparrow2 wrote:No offense to the people liking Ball but TH is the #1 PG in this draft. Three years out this will be obvious. IMO I would pick TH as the only PG in the top 6, Maybe Hayes would sneak in the top 6. I’m very big on Wiseman. I think he’s the best prospect. I know we have Mitch but I wouldn’t bypass him RIP Crushalot😞
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39873 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:His proven game efficiency and 3 point shooting make him a better prospect than Ball Yeah, but his unwillingness to drive the paint and inability to shoot on the move have me questioning if he's even a point guard at the next level. A divisive pick, similar to Lonzo. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39873 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() NotInMyHouse wrote:TheGame wrote:It is between him and Hayes for the second pg. He looks like the safer pick, but Hayes seems to have more upside. Ball is still the top PG prospect IMO. Hayes was playing in Germany. Hayes has the advantage of playing for team that gave him the freedom to play and run the offense. You have to question the level of competition, but I can say with confidence that Hayes has NBA level moves. I'm just not confident in his ability to consistently drive the paint. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() newyorknewyork wrote:BRIGGS wrote: Funky, slow shot but he is PG I'd go with. Don't know enough about the high end with Ball but it seems like he has so many flaws: defense, shooting. And having that 1-3 possible rotation of TH, Frank, RJ who all move the ball and Mitch and free agent who comes available after 2020-21 season who plays PF... Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() What does everyone thing about Ty v Hayes
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39873 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:What does everyone thing about Ty v Hayes Hayes is a better shooter of the dribble, has better dribble drive moves and is probably Ty's equal as a passer. Ty is better defensively and might be a better spot up shooter at the next level. I wouldn't say Ty is the better athlete, but he has superior physical tools. I don't see Ty or Killian becoming top tier offensive engines from the lead guard position. I'd probably take Hayes over Ty, but it makes sense why GSW would prefer Ty. Killian is like a mini-Dangelo Russell and I don't think they want to repeat that experience. Ty has potential as a 3 & D guard and he can play off-ball, all qualities that the GSW need. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30117 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
![]() martin wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:BRIGGS wrote: Thinking very similar. A 3&D PF to pair with Mitch. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Knickfury11
Posts: 20290 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/19/2020 Member: #8856 United Kingdom |
![]() newyorknewyork wrote:BRIGGS wrote: Haliburton is far superior to Ball at this stage and would be able to contribute almost immediately on both ends of the floor. Haliburton and Nesmith sounds like a dream scenario.. both look to have long term places in the NBA. Decent playmaker and knock out shooter. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() martin wrote:What does everyone thing about Ty v Hayes Before we drafted Frank, I said I liked the idea and concept of him, but every time I watched his highlights I was not sure at all. I get that same feeling with Hayes- I like his write up, but when I watch the highlights- he just looks a bit slow |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() martin wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:BRIGGS wrote: It’s maddening when you think that PF could have been KP- shame it didn’t work out (doubt he would have tolerated another losing year this last season). Would have loved to have seen a front court of KP and Mitch |
Knickfury11
Posts: 20290 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/19/2020 Member: #8856 United Kingdom |
![]() smackeddog wrote:martin wrote:What does everyone thing about Ty v Hayes Too many questions in Hayes from me. Haliburton not Uber quick but I see him as being superior at this level. See Haliburton as potential elite defence. |