smackeddog wrote:So starting with Don Chaney onwards, rank some of these- who was better in retrospect, which were the absolute worse, and which were better than thought at the time?Don Chaney 2001-4
Herb Williams 2004
Lenny Wilkens 2004-5 (chosen because of a PR disaster, whereby their choice of Fratello fell through, which left them scrambling to find a new coach before a story ran- basically they picked his name out of a hat)
Herb Williams 2005
Larry Brown 2005-6
Isiah Thomas 2006-8 (how was he really as a coach? Can't remember!)
Mike D-Antoni 2008-12 (I didn't like him, but I think he clearly stands out as maybe the best coach of the last 20yrs)
Mike Woodson 2012-2014 (My favourite coach of the last 20yrs, the perfect fit for the roster at the time. Basically took must of D'Antoni's stuff, but was more likeable as a person)
Derek Fisher 2014-16
Kurt Ramis 2016
Jeff Hornacek 2016-18
Fizdale 2018-19 (A used car salesman, got screwed over but he's basically a PR trick)
Mike Miller 2019 (an average to pretty good coach who looks great because his predecessors have been so awful)
Who was better or worse between Hornacek vs Fisher?????
I guess I will do the best to the worst:
1.) woodson- he is the most successful of the list so he should be in there. not to mention he got the most out of his players with a lot of them experiencing their best seasons under him. great defensively but unimaginative offensively
2.)d'antoni- now there are huge drops. his tenure ended badly but before melo he had a team with little talent and made them exciting to watch.
3.) hornecek- jeez this is bad. however, i put him on this list because he did mold a good team....before porzingis went down and then it fell apart. he was impressive because he had so many obstacles in his way and still the players played for him. that is an accomplishment for coaches in the past 20 years.
4.) wilkins- true he lasted half a season but the team was in the playoff bubble. then marbury went off the rails and became his usual defiant self and wilkins decided to abandon the team. he should be lower just by doing that but we wont fault van gundy for doing that so we shouldnt with wilkins. he had the team playing decent for two months which is amazing on this list.
5.) miller- only half a season and this guy is on the upper tier of this list. thats BAD! however, he has gotten them to play better by simplifying their playbook and developing confidence in MOST of the young players ( still waiting for knox).
6.) chaney- i could not stand chaney because his record was "subpar" at the time and as a fan i was not used to seeing 35-40 win teams. now those were the good old days. to be truthful, he had to navigate with a roster that was fragile and had major injuries as well as sprewell falling off the rails. i respect him more now than then.
7.) williams- it is unfair to him since both times he was given the role way before he was ready. he was being groomed into a coach by the likes of van gundy, chaney and wilkins and he both times given the playbook because the team was considered unruly and the coaches quit. he was not prepared and derailed any hope of becoming ahead coach in the nba.
8.) fisher- he was awful and i will never forget in a huddle he told his adult players not to be afraid and the other team put on their pants like you! he was also a victim of jackson hijacking his practices which made it confusing for players. not to mention him acting wild and unprofessional which caused him to get beat up by barnes and barnes harnassing resentment over the knicks for years.
9.)zeke- well, after coaching the team i guess he realize his roster wasnt that good! the only thing he did was develop the young players into adequate players but he did not accomplish much with this roster and could not, like most coaches, rein in marbury.
10.)brown- this is the one hire that surprised me the most. we saw what he did with indy and philly and how he dealt with players with huge egos like ai and miller so i thought he would be a great fit. man was i wrong. he ochestrated the worst ( at the time as others on this list beat it) regular season record in the franchise history in a year where they do not have a draft pick. none of the players improved A BIT. it was bad. brown bounced back somewhat in college but yet to be back in the nba because his methods are considered retro.
11.)rambis- so when he took over the reins he was so bad that i cant believe he was coaching. he was full in on the triangle and implemented it but he did a poor job teaching it. the players were confused and look lost and frustrated which led to a blow up in the locker room with melo. not to mention that opposing teams said they loved playing the knicks because their offense was simple and predictable. he was just a jackson lackey who masqueraded as a coach.
12.)fizdale- surprise, surprise! he has to be on the bottom because he was responsible for the knicks worst regular season record historically and one of the worst starts in its history. he made a promise that he could not keep and had to develop young players which is not his strong suit. to be honest, even though he is last on this list, he should get another coaching job because his strength is coaching teams with stars, something the knicks dont have. he made poor decision after poor decision that seemed common sense. it was almost like he was sabotaging the seasons.