Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/TheFrankIsola/status/1235642257312608256

This is not the right move

But what is...?

Definitely vanquish Payton, Portis and try to trade Randle. I suppose CP3 wouldn’t be complete boobery if we managed that (assuming we don’t draft a pg).

I’m worried now that Rose’s first moves will be trading for CP3 and signing Melo- that will be everything I feared when news leaked we were hiring him

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/TommyBeer/status/1235653262109478912

CP3 would immediately stabilize the team and make us better. He's been exceptional this year. High caliber PG would really help everyone on the floor. Especially if we draft a forward. CP3 is NOT a guy you give assets for. He's a guy you lump doodoo contracts in to save OKC some money. Like Portis/Randle/DSjr and one of those first rounders back. Not a lot of teams can take and be helped by CP3. Knicks are one of them. Its all about the deal. A good draft stacking the pipeline with athletic young and CP3 setting the tone could be a lot worse.

All about the trade

Let's say we can trade guys with buyouts for CP3 (is that even possible?).

Let's say we sign Melo.

CP3
RJ
Melo
Randle
Mitch

that's not good enough to make the playoffs in the east? Wouldn't it take some pressure off our yoots?

I am not interested in paying anything of value for CP3. But I am not necessarily against absorbing him. Ideally we would get a pick or two for paying that albatross. But the only thing worse about that contract is our roster's talent level

newyorknewyork wrote:If its a pure salary swap then it wouldn't be to bad. Can't depend on FAs coming here so him having high salary for 2 yrs isn't all that devistating. Would buy time to shape the roster while having a PG that can make his teammates better. Would possibly be worth it just for RJ & Mitch development.

CP3 is also someone with a lot of weight being the players rep. Having him come here and him having a positive experience would go a long way towards how future stars views the Knicks.

He's just a great locker room guy and teacher for young players.

we will have the cap space to absorb some of his contract with out giving up some of our young talent..

smackeddog wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:If its a pure salary swap then it wouldn't be to bad. Can't depend on FAs coming here so him having high salary for 2 yrs isn't all that devistating. Would buy time to shape the roster while having a PG that can make his teammates better. Would possibly be worth it just for RJ & Mitch development.

CP3 is also someone with a lot of weight being the players rep. Having him come here and him having a positive experience would go a long way towards how future stars views the Knicks.

He's just a great locker room guy and teacher for young players.

we will have the cap space to absorb some of his contract with out giving up some of our young talent..

Weirdly this season he’s been a great locker room guy and teacher, but before the season began there were a lot of articles claiming he was a terrible team mate and players hated playing with him

Rose should probably use this same formula that OKC is using if the deal does get done and he nets CP3. Sign Gallo, draft a PG to be mentored behind CP3. Utilize the draft pick PG, CP3 & Frank in multiple PG sets.

With that said, the handwriting is on the wall. Strike out on KD and Kyrie so we fire Fiz, Mills,and Perry possibly on the chopping block. Dolan hires Rose because he has connections. This is the 4th year in a row that we have seen a decline in attendance. The circus is back in town and circling the garden. Dolan seems desperate, for the sake of the franchise, I hope I'm wrong.

Uptown wrote:Chris Paul is one of my favorite players in the NBA but I would pass on this trade....Knicks should be in full rebuild mode, developing our young players and collecting assets. Paul would take a huge chunk out of our salary cap which would make us less flexible. Getting Paul here would no doubt cost us a 1st round pick. We should be in the business of collecting assets not moving them, at least not for a player who is past his prime. To make matters worse, I'm afraid that it stop with Paul.

With that said, the handwriting is on the wall. Strike out on KD and Kyrie so we fire Fiz, Mills,and Perry possibly on the chopping block. Dolan hires Rose because he has connections. This is the 4th year in a row that we have seen a decline in attendance. The circus is back in town and circling the garden. Dolan seems desperate, for the sake of the franchise, I hope I'm wrong.

I think those that may be in favor of taking on CP3 think that the Knick would *get* a first round pick to take on his contract and then his presence would help accelerate the young players’ development at the same time ala SGA. RJ Frank sure would get helped IMHO and so would Mitch in the DeAndre role with CP3.

I mean, how does Isola break this?

GustavBahler wrote:2 years isnt bad, but CP3's current numbers aside, how many times have we looked to aging stars for the answer? When has it paid off?

Paul being able to produce, stay healthy for the next couple of seasons, while eating up a big chunk of the cap is one concern. Paul playing well enough to get another big deal is another.

Would rather focus on a much younger PG. Its more than hype that the 2021 FA class is a big deal. Would rather wait.

Contract size aside, I view this more as bringing in a Jason Kidd type to captain the ship, don’t play more than 30 minutes a night versus being an all star savior.