toodarkmark wrote:I love coming on here and seeing people attack ESPN for telling the truth. #28 is too high. They're not breaking 20 wins.
I think you are a little off.. I think this is a 27 to 32 win team, that said, I completely feel you. the NBA is a stars league, right? Anyone arguing that point? Teams
with player(s) that are better than our best player (Randle, IMO):
better top player than the Knicks:
Celtics
Nets
Sixers
Raptors
Cavs
Pistons
Pacers
Bucks
Nuggets
TWolves
Blazers
Jazz
GSW
LAC
Suns
Kings
Heat
Magic
Wiz
Mavs
Rockets
Pelicans
Spurs
Possibly better top player than the Knicks:
OKC
Hawks
Bulls
Not better top player than the Knicks:
Hornets
Grizz
Seems to me that being ranked #28 was kind. Yeah, we signed guys, but not many move the needle, and people act like these guys all instinctively know how to play together. Anyone who has actually played basketball knows that after some time guys don't need to think and just know how to play together. That's gonna happen the first two months of the season?
BTW, I back-of-napkin made that list up in two minutes without coffee. If anyone has a valid team to drop I will edit the list. But I mean my overall point stands. If you think the Knicks have a better player than 10 teams in the league you are drinking the koolaid