HofstraBBall wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:MS wrote:It's only three games put...KP is averaging 26.3pts 5.5rbs 3.3assists on 46% from the field. He may get injured, but it would be fun watching him and Mitch defend the rim, two players couldn't compliment each other more.
it always bothered me that KP could never sniff 10 rpg, let alone 8. Teh guy is a unique talent but when you expect Luka to average more rebounds, well, that would irritate me as a fan.
this comment has nothing to do with you MS, but upon reflection, it appears Janis and KP were smart for escaping this dumpster fire, because that's what the 2019-20 Knicks are
your not going to get 10 rebounds out of Mitch either, because he is looking to swat every shot, just like KP, not to mention, KP is more of a perimeter player who won't get the benefits of put backs.
But if your a smart GM/Prez, you hire or trade for a rebond a specialist to play next to him.
Almost none of our players(since mills has gotten here) compliments each others skill set.
We basically got trash for melo, trash for KP, waived Kanter (the key piece in the melo trade, and with an expiring contract)trash for Willy.
we should be looking at
rj
KD
kp
as a core
We got mitch for Melo...that alone made it a GREAT trade. We get it dude you hate this FO lol. Look im not saying they have bene terrific but given all that circumstances I like a lot of their moves. Even this year we have talent enough to at least be fun. We should be 2-1. Like I said I like Fizdale and I think he has good qualities but he needs to implement a system and he needs to be sto allowing players to have free reign
Never agreed that Melo was as bad as most think. Always gave him credit for One, wanting to come here, Two, giving us a great season in which we were reminded what it felt like to win. However, agree that it was a good trade to get anything in return. Specially because it resulted in Mitch and other pieces. If those turn out to be anything of value, we will see. But it was time to move on.
In terms of system from Fiz. Think this comes up a lot. People I talk to about college basketball and systems being implemented always bring up how bad Pro Basketball systems are. How its all one on one basketball. Which are fair points. Problem is that MOST NBA teams are running the same thing. I have told many fans that complain about the NBA to just go start watching college basketball. Not trying to be rude to them but being realistic as to expectations for what modern basketball is. That is isolation plays, PnR with two players and one cutter and drive and pass out for multiple 3pt shots. There is just not much Harvard back cut systems in place. Nor read and react movement seen in college. I don't know if its because you just have such a disparity in talent with most teams. Or because the NBA pushes the narrative of the benefits of establishing a superstar to help in slaes and merchandising.
Think its no secret that the Knicks were always a blue collar team. Watched by blue collar people. Hard working guys the fight every day. Many loyal to working together as groups. Those are the players that we all seem to like. We love hard working defensive guys. We like when the ball moves and we all work together. We like team work and no ONE star. Pretty sure every fan would agree that this is the team most like to watch. As I do. Problem is that is just not what the NBA is. SO don't see the value of expecting it to change.
Side note, you look at the GS Warriors. They had several stars that made it easy to share the ball and trust team mates. Although they did not really have a complex offensive scheme. Basic drive a kick offense with occasional ISO with Durant. But fans always mention them as the epitome of team oriented offense. If you notice it is no longer working with lower level talent. I will bet that even they go to a more ISO type offense with Curry now that they are struggling and no longer have all those stars on the team.
I think some of it is more historical. In pros no zone defense for so long. If you had a talent mismatch with a guy who could dribble you maximize that advantage
It's a dumb strategy though if you don't have that guy
That's why i have not been critical of Fizz running this offense through RJ. Some of the best offenses now are not run through a classical point guard: Harden, Luca, Giannis, Kawhi, Lebron, Derozan in Toronto. You end up with layups, FTs or open 3s
Having said that, the ball still needs to move. Every time it stalls you're just giving the defense a better chance to set and organize