[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

if we're considering trading our pick (plus other stuff) for AD, does it make sense to consider Bradley Beal
Author Thread
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/13/2019  12:11 PM
he's still only 25 and would be a better age fit with other FAs we are considering
(5)(7)
AUTOADVERT
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
6/13/2019  12:17 PM
I like Beal a lot, I'd definitely consider trading for him if the price was very low (say the 3rd pick & DSj). Anything more and you're just building yourself a prison.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/13/2019  12:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/13/2019  12:26 PM
Chandler wrote:he's still only 25 and would be a better age fit with other FAs we are considering

I mention this in april when the "kyrie to the knicks" was a heated rumor, i actually prefer Beal and KD,over kyrie and kd..

I know the wiz need to do something other than keeping beal and wall together and avg 35 to 38 wins a season, right now they are in cap hell

ES
Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/13/2019  12:41 PM
I agree about Beal, i really like him. I would like him, but probably not for the 3rd pick, plus whatever else it takes. If we can get him with future picks, Knox, Dotson, DSJ ext, that's fine. Pairing Beal and RJB would be ideal. But i don't see it happening.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/13/2019  12:47 PM
Knixkik wrote:I agree about Beal, i really like him. I would like him, but probably not for the 3rd pick, plus whatever else it takes. If we can get him with future picks, Knox, Dotson, DSJ ext, that's fine. Pairing Beal and RJB would be ideal. But i don't see it happening.

I think he comes cheaper than AD, because it's more of cap relief for the wiz

ES
fishmike
Posts: 53829
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/13/2019  12:57 PM
my god why? I mean he's pretty good.
We likely draft RJ/Dotson/Trier/Frank/Jenkins/Garrett... How does Beal make us much better? We need playmakers and stoppers. I see the biggest holes as guys who can help other guys get easier shots and guys who can lock **** down on D. Beal is nice.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

6/13/2019  1:04 PM
I don't think it make sense for either AD nor Beal. We are not one piece away... makes no sense to empty the cupboard
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/13/2019  1:26 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:I agree about Beal, i really like him. I would like him, but probably not for the 3rd pick, plus whatever else it takes. If we can get him with future picks, Knox, Dotson, DSJ ext, that's fine. Pairing Beal and RJB would be ideal. But i don't see it happening.

I think he comes cheaper than AD, because it's more of cap relief for the wiz


By himself i don't see him coming cheaper, but maybe we can absorb the last year of the Mahimi deal and lessen the cost?
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39884
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/13/2019  1:38 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:I agree about Beal, i really like him. I would like him, but probably not for the 3rd pick, plus whatever else it takes. If we can get him with future picks, Knox, Dotson, DSJ ext, that's fine. Pairing Beal and RJB would be ideal. But i don't see it happening.

I think he comes cheaper than AD, because it's more of cap relief for the wiz


He's their lone asset at this point. Cheap is relative at this point. Yeah, he'll come cheaper than Davis. But they'll still want to violate any future trade partners once they get new GM.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/13/2019  3:10 PM
If our plan is to stock up on FAs to win now, I think he would be a better option than an 18 or 19 year old pick

I would imagine it would be straight up for 3 or part of a bigger package where perhaps we include a pg (which they need) and get another pick or player back.

We need a sg who can shoot. We need a team where players can complement one another and not just take turns going ISO

He's young enough (25) big enough (6' 5") shoots well (has been as high as 40% 3pointers, >50% eFG)

If we decide we can't get the FAs we want -- and instead use space as trash collectors to get more picks -- I would definitely keep the 3 pick

(5)(7)
if we're considering trading our pick (plus other stuff) for AD, does it make sense to consider Bradley Beal

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy