Author | Thread |
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
5/16/2019 11:20 AM
So on a scale, with one end being "just build with young players and the draft" and the opposite ed being "give up the farm for established stars", where does everyone fall?
It seems we're at least looking into he possibility of trading for AD- to me, this only seems to make sense if they plan on bringing him as the third star this offseason, rather than just one of two. If that's the case, do you do it, and at what cost? Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: So according to Knicks Film School to make the salaries match (or come within the required % in a trade- I think Bagely said we'd need AD to waive his trade kicker and we'd need to send out at least $22mil), we'd need to include: Frank $4.4mil Also picks The key is, would you also include Mitch or is that your breaking point? The Levels are: 1) If we luck out, just keep building with youth and picks I'm willing to go up to level 4, maybe- definitely not 5. I'm happy at level 3, which is where I hope we'll end up this offseason. |
AUTOADVERT |
KnixinSix
Posts: 20066 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/27/2013 Member: #5626 |
5/16/2019 6:01 PM
smackeddog wrote:So on a scale, with one end being "just build with young players and the draft" and the opposite ed being "give up the farm for established stars", where does everyone fall?
DSJ For AD |
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
5/17/2019 2:48 AM
KnixinSix wrote:smackeddog wrote:So on a scale, with one end being "just build with young players and the draft" and the opposite ed being "give up the farm for established stars", where does everyone fall? The thing that makes me wonder about level 4 or 5 is that Mills and Perry only a few weeks ago categorically said "we won't skip steps"- how is trading all our youth and some future picks not skipping steps? I mean, I think you can make a case for it, i just don't get why they re-iterated that point if they were okay trading for AD. |