knicks1248 wrote:Knixkik wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Knixkik wrote:franco12 wrote:to get back on topic - I don't see Trier as a PG. Maybe an attacking combo guard, probably off the bench for a while.Right now, Mudiay is our only pure PG- Burke is more tweaner - small shooting guard that has to play PG because he isn't 6'6".
I would argue that Mudiay is definitely not a pure PG. We have a group of combo guards. We need a pure PG, like Bledsoe or Rubio. Both are free agents. For the right cost this summer, you would see a world of difference with one of them. Mudiay can still develop into one though, but he's nowhere near there now. But he's the closest thing we have currently.
I don't see Bledsoe as a pure PG. He's more of a physically gifted version of Burke. Rubio is good, but he's only as good as the players around him. He might make sense if Durant signs and the other roster pieces flesh out.
If Durant signs then it alleviates a need for a pure PG, as he will be a primary playmaker. If we don't get Durant, we absolutely need a pure PG. Bledsoe scores like Burke, but he also plays D and gets teammates much more involved. He's a better all-around player and PG. Rubio is a pure PG who lacks the scoring to be a star, which we don't necessarily need with KP, Knox, Hardaway, Trier, Dotson, etc, so he could be an excellent fit in a lineup meant to surround KP properly.
I thought the knicks were stupid for not trading for bledsoe last season
Noah, frank and a protected 1st was all that was needed.
Now they had to eat Noahs contract, frank looks nothing like an nba PG, and Mudiay would have been a solid back up to Bledose--point guard position would have been solidify
Trier is not a pg, and struggles with the rest of his game when giving pg responsibilities
I think trading a 1st is a bad idea in general, but i understand your point. But we could have him for free this summer as a free agent (and have plenty of space to resign Mudiay on a short-term contract as his backup if we want.) If we strike out on the top free agents, i am all for Bledsoe or Rubio. We need a PG badly. We can't waste Porzingis' early prime years without a reliable PG. Age is always a concern, but if we sign either player to a 3 or 4 year deal we can work towards developing an eventual replacement in the meantime thru the draft and internal development. I am fine being patient with all other positions. Let Robinson, Porzingis, Knox, Vonleh, Trier, Dotson, Ntilikina etc develop and get their minutes accordingly and take their lumps, but the PG position needs to be a impact playmaker who can create plays for these guys, as it will accelerate their development. KP, Knox, and Robinson especially need quality PG play in order to properly develop and fulfill their potential.