[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

most people are projecting Portland out of the playoffs. I am not one of them
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/17/2004  1:36 AM
how do they match up with the knicks--are we better or are they--on paper---

C Ratliff 6-10 235
PF Randolph 6-9 250
SF Miles 6-9 210
SG Andersen 6-5 190
PG Van Exel 6-1 190
C Pryzbilla 7-1 250
F Rahim 6-9 245
F Patterson 6-5 225
G Woods 6-8 220
G Stoudemire 5-11 195
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
9/17/2004  1:58 AM
I'd say they are unless Sweetney proves himself to be a force.

You can't argue with the 20/10 Randolph brings.
#Knickstaps
CTKnicksfan
Posts: 20312
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/24/2004
Member: #572
9/17/2004  7:20 AM
They are better, but the west is so deep, I don't know who they're beating out for a playoff spot. They could contend for the 8th spot, along w phoenix and LA. IF they can turn SAR into a bigtime player now or at the deadline, then it might be a different story.

1 SA
2 Minnesota
3 Sac
4 Houston
5 Dallas
6 Nuggets
7 Jazz
8 Lakers
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/17/2004  7:53 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

how do they match up with the knicks--are we better or are they--on paper---

C Ratliff 6-10 235
PF Randolph 6-9 250
SF Miles 6-9 210
SG Andersen 6-5 190
PG Van Exel 6-1 190
C Pryzbilla 7-1 250
F Rahim 6-9 245
F Patterson 6-5 225
G Woods 6-8 220
G Stoudemire 5-11 195

They're starting rotation is better at center and PF, ours is better at PG, SG, and SF. We have a deeper bench too. Overall, I'd give the Knicks a small edge. Being in the east should also help the Knicks win more games than the Blazers too.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/17/2004  8:23 AM
tomorrow BRIGGS will post another one of his "Is this team not better than the Knicks" threads...i'm taking bets...will it be the Atlanta Hawks? or the Charlotte Bobcats?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/17/2004  8:26 AM
woops, nevermind...i see he's already posted his Atlanta Hawks roster thread.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
9/17/2004  8:33 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

how do they match up with the knicks--are we better or are they--on paper---

C Ratliff 6-10 235
PF Randolph 6-9 250
SF Miles 6-9 210
SG Andersen 6-5 190
PG Van Exel 6-1 190
C Pryzbilla 7-1 250
F Rahim 6-9 245
F Patterson 6-5 225
G Woods 6-8 220
G Stoudemire 5-11 195


Dude, I don't disagree, but how is this remotely relevent until they trade SAR? I think everyone would agree their roster is far from final, though it is good. You'll remember, the Knicks, without Houston or Crawford did beat the Blazers in a huge game in March when both were on the verge of falling out of the playoffs.
¿ △ ?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/17/2004  10:07 AM
Posted by TMS:

tomorrow BRIGGS will post another one of his "Is this team not better than the Knicks" threads...i'm taking bets...will it be the Atlanta Hawks? or the Charlotte Bobcats?
LOL! I was thinking about that too
« Reply To Topic
most people are projecting Portland out of the playoffs. I am not one of them
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy