HofstraBBall wrote:Playing Eli Manning on the back-half of the schedule is a good thing for the future of the NY Giants because he is the MOST capable on the roster?
So at 1-6 the NY Giants should be trying to win their remaining games and negatively impact their draft capital?
So 4-12 is better than 1-15 or 2-14 for the future of the team?
So when you saw Barkley stopped for a loss on several occasions, did you think he should be benched? Or did you not think the O line was to blame?
I think the o-line is awful.
But I also know the Giants season is over. I don't think you quite grasp this concept.
I think Barkley will be on the Giants in 2 years. Manning won't.
I think the next time the NY Giants play a postseason game, there's a decent chance Barkley is playing in it. There is NO chance Manning will.
Manning's Giants postseason career is over.
That might not be the case for Barkley and Beckham and Shepard and Engram and Hernandez and maybe Collins.
This isn't rocket science.
Funny, think people have been saying the same thing about Eli since he came into the league. How many SB has he won? Rivers?
You're again making it very clear you're not grasping what I've written and prefer to invent your own opponent.
I love Manning. I think he's had a great, HoF career. I am in NO way a Twitter warrior nitpicking his flaws and comparing him negatively to his contemporaries. I'd sign up for his career again in a second knowing then what I know now. I totally understood why they selected Barkley and went for it this year.
Its just time. Right now he's not a playoff QB, and again... THERE IS NO SHAME IN THAT. It ends for everyone eventually, and 2018 is the end for him whether it's in November or December.
Did you not see my answer in BOLD? NP He is the best available at that position. Last I checked that earns you the spot. Not fan opinion.
So was Damon Harrison and Eli Apple.