Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/24/2012 Member: #3997 |
5/17/2022 7:30 PM LAST EDITED: 5/17/2022 7:33 PM
blkexec wrote:fwk00 wrote:I was told on this forum that Ntilikina was "not even good at defense".Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:
Ntilikina's qualifying offer with the Knicks was over 7 million dollars. His cap hold if they gave that to him would have been about 19 million dollars. Don't get me wrong, I didn't like the FA moves the Knicks made last offseason, but you don't choke our your cap flexibility like that for Frank N. Ntilikina walked out of his rookie deal and immediately had to sign a rarely used ( for an actual NBA player on track for a league pension) Exhibit 9 contract. How badly are you seen by the rest of the league when you can play above average wing defense in the NBA and still be young and can only garner a bargain bin/essentially "ego insulting" contract after sitting on the market until you are a Tier 6 free agent? The people on this forum who wanted Ntilikina gone but wished him the best of luck in his next stop are actually pretty smart indeed. Dallas would not have paid Frank N that 7 million dollars. They are paying him less than the veteran's minimum because it makes him easily to dispose of if he doesn't work out. Respect on what? If Ntilikina wanted to be a Knicks and STAY a Knick, because for years a starting job was literally up for grabs and the entire franchise wanted him to take one and make it his own, he should have worked harder on his three point shot, fight through small injuries, actually showed some effort moving off the ball ( he did literally nothing but sulk when the ball wasn't in his hands) and actually attack the rim at some point/any point. You don't spend 7 million on a Tier 6 guy. Frank N gives you wing defense but he literally gives you nothing else. There's nothing wrong with being a specialist, but he cost the Knicks a lottery pick, four years of coaching investment, a roster spot and the opportunity cost of that, cap space and a total of 18 million overall in salary output. What he costs the Mavericks or any other NBA team TODAY to be a fringe end of the bench specialist is NOT what he would cost the Knicks in TOTAL INVESTMENT to be that same fringe end of the bench specialist. Don't call the rest of the forum regulars as something stupid because you either don't see or don't care or don't understand the overall cap implications/cap managements issues in play. No one took anything from Frank Ntilikina. His bull**** lazy uninterested play took something from him. |
Philc1
Posts: 26675 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 9/2/2020 Member: #8897 |
5/17/2022 8:45 PM
TripleThreat wrote:blkexec wrote:fwk00 wrote:I was told on this forum that Ntilikina was "not even good at defense".Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: It would have been essentially a 1 year deal. Who cares if it’s $19 million. We’re locked into Randle the black hole for $117 million over 4 years |
Marv
Posts: 35540 Alba Posts: 69 Joined: 9/2/2002 Member: #315 |
5/18/2022 7:47 AM
the squirrel video was excellent
|