fishmike wrote:Randle cant shoot. How much do you want to sign a guy for who cant shoot?
Can't shoot or not given the opportunity to shoot?
I always refer to Paul Millsap when it comes to players like Julius Randle. In Utah, Millsap attempted 133 three pointers and hit 31 at a percentage of .274 in seven seasons. When he went to Atlanta he attempted 903 three pointers and hit 302 at a percentage of .335 in four seasons. Last season with Denver he attempted 113 three pointers and hit 39 at a percentage of .345 in his first year.
Now as you can see, Millsap didn't shoot a great deal when he was in Utah because that wasn't his role on that team. He didn't play as a stretch four in Utah, but he was used in that type of role in Atlanta and this last season in Denver. When you look at Randle's usage in LA he was used in a similar manner because he was not asked to take a lot of shots, especially from beyond the arc, but he did post a career high in field goal percentage. So maybe Randle can develop an outside shot if he's asked to take on that role? If Millsap can develop a three point shot in his eighth season and Al Horford in his ninth, then there is no reason why Randle cannot develop a three point shot if he works hard on it and is given the opportunity to shoot from range in his role.
Whenever I've seen Randle he doesn't look to have a broken shot, he's always looked ok. Granted we don't really have a need for him to come in and play center, but we could always take him on a one year rental deal at PF and give him the chance. Who knows he might do well enough to play himself into a long term role with KP at the five (or four if Randle goes five), or perhaps he adds trade value before the deadline that we can take advantage of if we don't intend to keep him long term. At the right price he could be worth a one year rental like Hezonja, however I doubt we have the space available to get him and he'll get a pay day or one year prove it kinda deal like KCP's elsewhere.